Ever wonder why Gulenko drew his model sideways and with a different function order from Model A. I was messing with some socionics and I figured it all out!
First, here is a table of benefit (left) and supervision (down). You will see the bottom half of the table is a repeat of types because this only cycles through the process types, but I think it is easier to read like this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ← ILE ← LSE ← SEE ← EIE ← ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ← LSI ← SEI ← EII ← ILI ← ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ← SEE ← EIE ← ILE ← LSE ←
↓
↓
↓
↓
← EII ← ILI ← LSI ← SEI ←
↓
↓
↓
↓
Now replace each type with their leading function and add Gulenko's numbering and energy flow direction and you get his completed model.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ → 1I → 2P → 3F → 4E → ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ → 5L → 6S → 7R → 8T → ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ → 3F → 4E → 1I → 2P →
↓
↓
↓
↓
→ 7R → 8T → 5L → 6S →
↓
↓
↓
↓
I haven't seen this in his model yet but let's add the cascading dual functions on the diagonal
⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ → 1I → 2P → 3F → 4E → ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ → 5L → 6S → 7R → 8T → ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ → 3F → 4E → 1I → 2P → ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ → 7R → 8T → 5L → 6S → ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡ ↓ ⤡
Seems pretty legit to me. It is kind of weird that his is substituting an information element for an entire type. Maybe he is just thinking on a high strategic level that just takes blocking (which if you didn't notice are all vertical pairs) into account. Some next level cross contextual thinking.
This also explains how he renamed the functions. His #7 is the brake, which is synonymous with model A's #4 vulnerable function. If you look at the first table of types, you'll see that is the supervisor type to ILE.