Originally Posted by
anndelise
I suppose typing some parts of this can only really be done based on relativeness/interactions.
For example, whether a person is considered intelligent or dull would depend largely on who you're asking, and what their criteria for it is.
Another example, dominance/submission are actually generally based on the particular relationship, or even a particular activity. A person can easily be dominant to some people, submit to other people, fight for dominance with yet other people, try to submit to someone's who's trying to submit to them. And even be dominant in certain situations, while being willing to submit in other situations.
While yes, the OP did say that we can be both, but our typing would lean us to one way over another, ..is it an accurate dominant typing if the typee is in 50.5% situations where they are 50.5% dominant? Should they be held to the same expectations, and descriptions of a person who is closer to 90% situations where they are 90% dominant?
If I were to try typing myself based on this system, I'd probably wind up with XcXXA(?)G.
(Though if the criteria for Good involves a lot of caretaking type behaviors, I'd more likely fall into X there, too.)