My VI skills have been incapacitated.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
come on, give it a try
ENFp was my first impression.
4w3-5w6-8w7
SEE
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
you're pretty good at it!
Myers-Briggs test says I'm ESFP but I was always hesitating between ESFP and ENFP...
congratulations guys
I'm so fucking obviously good at VI!
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I have many traits from both of them... just those answers which decide whether I'm sensing or intuitive were always the only ones in a test I wasn't sure about at all
Really, it's hard to judge myself subjectively, especially with such questions as: Do you tend to rely on your experience rather than on theoretical alternatives?
do havin doubts bout such questions makes it easier to say which one of those two I am?
I recommend these readings:
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=SEE
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=IEE
(You also have links to other SEE/IEE descriptions at the bottom of the pages.)
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
Yeah, those questions are essentially bullshit.Originally Posted by chilivanilli
See above.Really, it's hard to judge myself subjectively, especially with such questions as: Do you tend to rely on your experience rather than on theoretical alternatives?
Nah. It just means you aren't good at pigeon-holing yourself I mean, taken generally, one could peripherally extrapolate some preference to explore Ne alternatives, etc., but I wouldn't attempt to type you on such limited, contextless information.do havin doubts bout such questions makes it easier to say which one of those two I am?
Yeah But I actually read it an hour ago and it was definitely one of the better ones. I'd be interested to read your take on the vital ring.
4w3-5w6-8w7
I'm going with SEE.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
My first guess would be ESE or EIE, but I could also see SEE.
I'd say ESE's a possibility due to the fact that she kinda reminds me of my roomie a bit... but that's all I got.
Oh, and she uses smiley's, much the same was as I do...
haha, I was feeling Delta NF, but I could see the SEE
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Most of what you read on this forum is confusing and or contradicting mumbo jumbo. My advice is to stick to socionics.us and also the descriptions of the types by Filatova and other qualified socionists for now. At least this way you know that you are getting untainted information-and you don't even have to trust my or others information in meantime as you are going to a 'source' of more accurate stuff.
For instance, many people see Tereg as an ENFp, and use him as some sort of benchmark. However there are some ISTp's here are of the opinion he isn't ENFp, he's probably INFp (or ISFp), and other ENFp's think this as well. And those who think he is ENFp (: So if you go by the stuff he has wrote (like that which Winterpark quoted you) then there is chance you could be mislead.
On your photos, some looked ESFp, others ENFp. You could try focusing more on the socionic dichotomy of S/N to determine which one you are. (Again, people here can object to the dichotomies, but Rick De Long, and all other Russian based socionists use them-so it's about getting correct info so socionics can apply to you and real life, and/or just having fun on this little piece of the internet.)
Last edited by Cyclops; 12-22-2008 at 12:54 PM.
ESE is possible too, I think, as cracka said. I might even consider SEI.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
thx for all the feedback, you've been a lot of help