in your views what does the T-F dichotomy represent? what do the T and F opposite poles symbolize?
what makes F be mutually exclusive with T?
in your views what does the T-F dichotomy represent? what do the T and F opposite poles symbolize?
what makes F be mutually exclusive with T?
qualitative/quantitative distinction
Both are purely social constructs wich exist only within the system of socionics. Don't bother with the philosophical basis of socionicis, it has enough problems already.
how do i dislike a post
I believe thinking could be considered qualitative in the sense of technical quality, practicality or efficiency.
Maybe humane-qualitative/technical-quantitative?
I prefer to use subjective-evaluation/objective-description, with an emphasis on feeling being the personal assignment of worth, and thinking being the impersonal assignment of meaning.
DISCLAIMER
If I use the wrong words for the same concepts, please excuse me. I understand this is a Socionics forum, but arguing over something as simple as semantics over similar concepts is not desirable. I'll try to keep to Socionics terminology, but I may forget to, and don't wish for any unnecessary confrontation. If you don't understand my point of view due to a misuse of proper vocabulary, I will be happy to expound upon the source of the misconception, and will attempt to use the proper word the next time. Also, if you happen to disagree with my opinion (which all of my posts are, regardless of how I present them), please don't attack me ad hominem. I am perfectly happy to consider alternatives, and am also fine with a friendly debate, but do not wish to be insulted just because my opinion differs from yours, nor insulted over my purposes for holding this opinion.
Thank you!
I think Te fuels Fi in that it gives the user awareness of all the logical systems going on in the environment, and then that information is used to build a value system of right and wrong.
Fe gives meaning to Ti.