i seem to lean towards enfp these days

[Ms. Kensington]

some people have told me that i have fi tendencies.. i was wondering if delta could comment on this. anyone who has seen me post on the forum have any opinions on this?

[jewels]

I have no idea...but your forum name sounds kinda INFj

[snegledmaca]

Wait, you mean you are not IEE? I always thought you were IEE, like, took it for granted. What type do you think you are?

[istpunk]

gay sex

[Ms. Kensington]

Wait, you mean you are not IEE? I always thought you were IEE, like, took it for granted. What type do you think you are?

no you didnt! i said certain people said i reminded them of slacker mom and you said, yeah i do remind you of slacker mom, who is IEE. I think I'm INTj, and still do.. i was just thinking that people remark that i seem IEE, and I wanted to understand why.

also didn't you consider ISTp for your type fairly recently?

[Ms. Kensington]

yeah you seem introverted.

i very much appreciate that you only have 65 posts on this thing and do not doubt that you have been here a long time, long enough to see my posts. <3 brevity

[xyz]

yeah you seem real introverted to me. But then again plenty of ENFp's say they can be pretty introverted sometimes.

All I know is that everytime I see your name I think "Mrs. Robinson?"

[Mattie]

Ever give INFj a thought? I can't really contribute to analyzing you since I never put effort to noticing things beforehand, but INFjs are close to ENFps function-wise and it would keep you within the IJ temperment so it doesn't seem like a huge jump. Just from your posts here I wouldn't say ENFp but INFj I would consider.

[munenori2]

I don't really have enough close contact to say for sure. You are a cool person though in any case.

[JuJu]

I don't really have enough close contact to say for sure. You are a cool person though in any case.

I agree with this, w/ ISTpunk, and w/ you that you are INTj, Ms. K. To be honest, I've never felt the supposed downside of inter-type supervision w/you, or any INTj for that matter... If you're thinking about investigating a Delta type though, maybe INFj..?

P.S. snegledmaca, you do not come across as ISTp on here... Maybe INTp, (hunch based on what I've read that you've written,) but not ISTp.

[snegledmaca]

no you didnt! i said certain people said i reminded them of slacker mom and you said, yeah i do remind you of slacker mom, who is IEE. I think I'm INTj, and still do.. i was just thinking that people remark that i seem IEE, and I wanted to understand why.

Oh yeah, I completely forgot . I am not really sure if you remind me of slacker mom, but I do seem to have a conception of you being IEE. But I don't know why.

also didn't you consider ISTp for your type fairly recently?

Among other things, yeah.

P.S. snegledmaca, you do not come across as ISTp on here... Maybe INTp, (hunch based on what I've read that you've written,) but not ISTp.

I seem to value Ne - Si over Se - Ni. And I tend to actively devalue and inhibit Se. Along side of Fe. That is, I tend to actively devalue and inhibit Se and Fe. In terms of my values and IME usage, SLI fits excellently. And it fits with my relations also. All in all, it makes the most sense. ILI on the other hand makes much less sense. However, I don't know.

[Ms. Kensington]

Oh yeah, I completely forgot . I am not really sure if you remind me of slacker mom, but I do seem to have a conception of you being IEE. But I don't know why.

Among other things, yeah.



I seem to value Ne - Si over Se - Ni. And I tend to actively devalue and inhibit Se. Along side of Fe. That is, I tend to actively devalue and inhibit Se and Fe. In terms of my values and IME usage, SLI fits excellently. And it fits with my relations also. All in all, it makes the most sense. ILI on the other hand makes much less sense. However, I don't know.

haha, cute. maybe you would come off less wordy in a video. make one.

[Ms. Kensington]

I agree with this, w/ ISTpunk, and w/ you that you are INTj, Ms. K. To be honest, I've never felt the supposed downside of inter-type supervision w/you, or any INTj for that matter... If you're thinking about investigating a Delta type though, maybe INFj..?

P.S. snegledmaca, you do not come across as ISTp on here... Maybe INTp, (hunch based on what I've read that you've written,) but not ISTp.

yeah i trust that you would know even though i feel my contact with you was pretty limited. I trust ethical types over logical ones sometimes in their typings, mostly ENFp and INFp, when they do it in the areas they have confidence in.

I think what were sticking points with me were liking tecnology, random bits of info as a hobby, and being sort of Ne in my writing.. getting annoyed with too much idle tinkering (to me, i dont see anything wrong with mental masturbation or theory perfection per se.. i just don't like it if there seems to be lack of ability). I was wondering though because i have sort of been changing in my attitude toward subjects that the Te people in my life have been schooled in.. car repair, insurance, investment.. etc.

[Ms. Kensington]

?

[munenori2]

I'll have to do some more thinking, but talking with you last night was pretty illuminating.

[UDP]

You always seemed to have the hots for my hands.

You could likely be delta NF.

[JuJu]

You always seemed to have the hots for my hands.

You could likely be delta NF.

a hand fetish?

i knew a SLI with a foot fetish... not sure it's type related, hehe

[Ms. Kensington]

You always seemed to have the hots for my hands.

You could likely be delta NF.

im trying to remember when I said your hands were nice.. i think maybe when you posted black and white pics? I do notice and comment on people's hands or other body parts a lot.

[Ms. Kensington]

I'll have to do some more thinking, but talking with you last night was pretty illuminating.

<3

hm.. yeah i went pretty overboard. I would be scared that I didn't present myself the right way but my experience is that INFjs don't get bent out of shape because someone else is weird.

I think you have seen me on cam enough that I am not Exxp.. I think. I dunno.. maybe I just really like ISTps and don't have a handle on Fe.

[Elro]

some people have told me that i have fi tendencies.. i was wondering if delta could comment on this. anyone who has seen me post on the forum have any opinions on this?

I don't think I'm Delta, but I don't think you're Ne-dominant. You might be Fi-dominant; I can't really tell for sure.

[mikemex]

All I know is that everytime I see your name I think "Mrs. Robinson?"

*Thumbs up for fucking older women*

[xyz]

*Thumbs up for fucking older women*

*thumbs up right back at ya*

[jessica129]

What ever happened to slakermom??

[Ms. Kensington]

i think Ms. Kensington is Fi to a big extent as Mrs., etc. are Fi stuff. often people would use role with their appearance, especially at first. maybe her nick selection has been influenced by it.

hm.... maybe .. i would need to think about this more.

[Ms. Kensington]

I don't think I'm Delta, but I don't think you're Ne-dominant. You might be Fi-dominant; I can't really tell for sure.

you think because i have a strong Ixxj impression?

people don't question my type anymore.

[munenori2]

people don't question my type anymore.

AWEs - Um sub?

[UDP]

you think because i have a strong Ixxj impression?

people don't question my type anymore.

[Slacker]

i think Ms. Kensington is Fi to a big extent as Mrs., etc. are Fi stuff. often people would use role with their appearance, especially at first. maybe her nick selection has been influenced by it.

She's named after a character in Austin Powers. It has nothing to do with whether she goes by Ms. or Mrs. or likes titles of respect or anything like that.

[Ms. Kensington]

She's named after a character in Austin Powers. It has nothing to do with whether she goes by Ms. or Mrs. or likes titles of respect or anything like that.

yeah i mean, parents really like mike meyers, what can i say . I got a penis pump for my birthday.

hey SM btw.

[Ms. Kensington]

?

^^ haha that response reminds me of you

[Slacker]

What ever happened to slakermom??

Sometimes it feels like there's been a bit of a lack of . . . interesting and useful discussion at this forum in general (not here in the delta area so much). I don't want to offend people so I will leave it at that.

[Slacker]

yeah i mean, parents really like mike meyers, what can i say . I got a penis pump for my birthday.

hey SM btw.

Hey Ms. K.

(Oh, and if you thought my comment about lack of interesting and useful discussion was about you, you might be ENFp. LOL. We're paranoid like that. But it wasn't so don't worry.)

[Ms. Kensington]

Hey Ms. K.

(Oh, and if you thought my comment about lack of interesting and useful discussion was about you, you might be ENFp. LOL. We're paranoid like that. But it wasn't so don't worry.)

lol. paranoid yes. hmm

[UDP]

?

^^ haha that response reminds me of you

(ok)

I was laughing at the request of asking someone to stop typing you. Maybe because you asked real nice, it will actually happen.

Sometimes it feels like there's been a bit of a lack of . . . interesting and useful discussion at this forum in general (not here in the delta area so much). I don't want to offend people so I will leave it at that.

I'm not concerned with offending people, so, allow me to say I agree with you. To speak from what I see, the forum's pretty much about joking around, socializing, coming up with new "arguments for someone's type", talking about those arguments. There's an interesting bit of "typing people based on your relationship to them", too, and I don't mean intertype relationships, either. Of course, in no way do I am I a perfect forum poster.

[Elro]

I was laughing at the request of asking someone to stop typing you. Maybe because you asked real nice, it will actually happen.

Maybe I read it wrong, but I got completely the opposite impression - that she was disappointed that more people weren't questioning her type. Rereading it, I see where you got that impression, but still am unsure whose is more accurate.

[Slacker]

I'm not concerned with offending people, so, allow me to say I agree with you. To speak from what I see, the forum's pretty much about joking around, socializing, coming up with new "arguments for someone's type", talking about those arguments. There's an interesting bit of "typing people based on your relationship to them", too, and I don't mean intertype relationships, either. Of course, in no way do I am I a perfect forum poster.

I think there's a lot of arguing simply for the sake of arguing. And a lot of people who think they're really brilliant who aren't. Also, a lot of people not interested in making Socionics more fleshed out, or finding any truth or anything, but who only want to show they're smarter, or at least want to look smarter. And who think if someone else comes up with something, they have to shoot it down or they'll lose some imaginary contest.

[UDP]

Yeah.

And, as for Elro, I see what you mean now. For some reason, I thought she said "please don't question my type anymore", instead of "people don't question my type anymore".

[xyz]

I think there's a lot of arguing simply for the sake of arguing. And a lot of people who think they're really brilliant who aren't. Also, a lot of people not interested in making Socionics more fleshed out, or finding any truth or anything, but who only want to show they're smarter, or at least want to look smarter. And who think if someone else comes up with something, they have to shoot it down or they'll lose some imaginary contest.

Man you have a way with saying what's on my mind ever so succinctly.

I didn't know we were all in that contest..

[Ms. Kensington]

Yeah.

And, as for Elro, I see what you mean now. For some reason, I thought she said "please don't question my type anymore", instead of "people don't question my type anymore".

heh, yeah i wasn't saying either. Just reporting a phenomenon.

[Ezra]

I have no idea...but your forum name sounds kinda INFj

Oh fuck... what has the world come to.

Ms. Kensington, with that kind of rationale (which much reminds me of Heath's), you certainly are not an LII.