I think you're IP as well. I don't think you're ILI.valuing. You challenge the internal consistency of statements people have made.
I think you're IP as well. I don't think you're ILI.
just going off my first impression: IEI-Fe 4w3 sx/spOriginally Posted by Katalina
Based on the first video, you have expressions identical to the LSI that I was seeing, but you are clearly extroverted. So, going on the idea that a person can act like a dual sometimes, I'd say you are EIE. Based on the first video. That, plus your plea to be told what you are or you will go insane.It is well known that EIE's and insanity go together like peanut butter and jelly. That's why EIE's need the literate and practical LSI's.
I just watched a bit of the second video, and if you are IEI, you are like no IEI that I have ever known, and I've known a lot of them.
I still think EIE. Hamlet. "I can easily type (read a role) other people well, but I can't type myself" (because I'm an EIE chameleon and can see myself playing any role.)
Make more videos for our entertainment.
Type with strong- (Model G). So, I think IEI, ESI.
On first vid you seemed to be bit ESI-ish.
Based on this I say IEI and this one is far better sample.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
First video gives me a strong impression ofIgnoring. It is like the face is hardly moving at all. Your voice is "emoting" in a way, so strong enough Fe is there, but no distinct clear "warm" smiles (not even micro expressions) which are typical for Fe Creative (esp +Fe). If your voice wasn't "emotive" (and characteristically Sincere communication style as it is in the second video) you could pass for Fe PoLR for most of the video, which in my experience is typical of Fe Ignoring.
I'd V.I you as Fi lead/Fe Ignoring. The content of your speech, coloured by aggressive language, is rather Se Creative...
P.S: Later you "emote" more Fe in that video, and in the second video. But my overall impression stands. And ESI has +Fe, so they can seem Fe Creative when they use enough Fe. Definitely Type 4, btw. Leaning 4w3.
P.P.S: In the first video I was even considering SEE for a sec, but the Fe was not strong enough, so I quickly ruled that out. I got the impression of Se right away.
In the first video you seem very ESI, in the second idk...But don't really see you as Beta NF, you're not EIE and kinda hard around the edges for IEI...You have a certain too idgaf and messy edgy vibe for Beta NF imo.
First video gives me a strong impression of
I'd V.I you as Fi lead/Fe Ignoring. The content of your speech, coloured by aggressive language, is rather Se Creative...
P.S: Later you "emote" more Fe in that video, and in the second video. But my overall impression stands. And ESI has +Fe, so they can seem Fe Creative when they use enough Fe. Definitely Type 4, btw. Leaning 4w3.
get rekt son
and yes im recycling memes, wanna fight?
meh it's getting difficult... I can't see you as N though, idk why... hmm, I'm sticking to ESI just because of your hate for Si, and you listed "to do things in the moment" as your values, although first you say that you don't do well with physical things, then lulz, at the q "what is beauty what is love" your answer: "that's a dumb question" hmmm, weak Si? Ne? Ni? can't tell... to me you do look judgemental, as in reflective, opinionated, so Fi could be as strong as to make you live in your own world... I doubt it's T, but you're all into sciences and you definitely know better...
anyway! you remind me of Marylin Monroe
I think swearing is barely type related if at all & being provocative to draw attention to something is more beta nf than gamma sf. I mean "aggressive," whatever. But I can see how ppl are getting sensing from vi.
This type of attitude is usually a combo of Se and Fi imo. Even the "Pls jesus V.I. me", "VI my ugly ass", "but really tho" - kinda erratic for IEI, they're usually more concerned with presentation and try to express themselves in a more organized fashion.
agreed, but I think Se is about being comfortable somehow inside every situation, as in a state of control of the environment... to swear denotes she's quite chill over there, a N would be more abstracted by default, less yo yo yo mofos.
I got Se vibes from her expressions and eyebrows though, she switches from happy to sad in a sudden and does that being aware of the effect she makes, she even uses her gestures as if she's talking, it's kind of mesmerizing to me... I think it's S, it looks confident in a way that N lacks... about "being there"
It's not about swearing, just the whole aura. First video eliminates Fe ego as far as I'm concerned.
I dunno, I could see gamma sf just watching the first video and not taking anything she says about herself in the second video seriously.
I got Fe from this
Yeah, and Aylen's too a bit.
You seem more verbally playful, rather unserious tbh, and enjoy poking fun at how people think and treating people more like creatures to psychologically mate with (seeing how interesting their worldview is and knowing how they react to things) at first instead of directly assessing relationship compatability or whether you find a person distasteful or not. What I'm trying to say is that I think you're Fe/Ti valuing. Your dislike for "mushy mushy" feelings as you call it is something I'd attribute to devaluing Si.
HAHAHAH~ Oh my gosh, yeah; that's a very accurate description of me, actually.
I definitely see what you're talking about hahahaha
I become aggressive for comedic effect a lot
I definitely have that edgy vibe sometimes
DID I MENTION I HATE SI
Heheh yeah
I am very reflective and opinionated
I think it's so funny I am getting typed as a Se type. That shows how bad I am at analyzing myself. I thought I was an Se PoLR for sure at one point
Yeah! That's the main reason I wasn't convinced.
WELL, I do really like LSIs... a lot. If that means anything.
Hhahahahah
I mean, I'm yelling at the camera HAHAHA I definitely get why people think I'm a Se type
I do get more like that when I'm comfortable
Interesting. Someone said the same thing a while ago. They said my face looked like it was molded from plastic hahaha; very stiff expressions.
HMHMHM is that a Se trait?
I definitely do that
How can you type reverie and Katalina ESI?
Contrasting the two pretty much makes it obvious how weak reverie's Se actually is, and how she cannot be ESI; and how Katalina cannot have 1D Se.
Hasn't reverie always been EII?
what makes me glad the most is that Olimpia's thorough analysis use all the elements that Sol doesn't comprehend in his ones, and they come as quite accurate in theory (often in practice too)... it's nice even to see how little agreement we can have about someone, all we experts.. AH!
I do kinda agree with this. Esp. “my ugly ass” and “but really tho” sound like speech patterns a lot of Gamma SF types use. Anyways, there’s definitely a lot of in the moment focus that makes me think you aren’t IEI. I see what people mean with ESI since you seem to muster up a physical prescence a lot more easily than I think an IEI would. But I could also see EII since you seem whimsical, even in just your voice which sounds like those of INFx I know and unlike any ESIs I know.
You do mention that you dislike Si and that you have trouble with the details of environments, which makes me a little uncomfortable typing you as a 4D Si type. On the other hand, Se is more about engaging with the environment and having a physical force, which you demonstrate better than INFx types.
So ESI seems more likely but it’s still early to be 100% sure.
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Gamma SF
You kind of got that Tiffany Pollard vibe going on lolol
I laughed so hard omg
Hahahah thanks! ^-^
Yeaaaaaaah; I could definitely see EII as a possibility.
It's super funny to me to be told I can muster up a physical presence hehehehe but I definitely get it
I get told I'm aggressive, crude, rowdy, etc when I'm joking sometimes.
^I see the Boxxy resemblance.
Lmaoo, Tiffany is my bitch. I can see this too. But a more delicate white version.
It happens to me, too.Eventually people stopped telling me after they got used to it.
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Lmaoo, Tiffany is my bitch. I can see this too. But a more delicate white version.
LOOL Yesss
ASJDOID I USED TO GET TOLD THAT ALL THE TIME
HAHAHHAHA I'm dead^I see the Boxxy resemblance.
Lmaoo, Tiffany is my bitch. I can see this too. But a more delicate white version.
It happens to me, too.
Suk my assYou are creepy I don't like you
Another Delta ST to block
Fe
I'm going to guess, girl. Possibly a boy, but more likely girl. Head in the clouds quadra.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
half boy/half girl
lol, I thought the same thing, but I didn't want to say anything.
Schrödinger's baby
(An alpha NT joke.)
Unicorns don't exist, Sara.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
Except if you attempt to find out whether Katalina is a boy or a girl, the observer is the one who will end up dying instead of her. Probably out of self-defense.
Posting Permissions
