One thing that I don't like with socionics is how explanations tend to separate the functions. Hidden Agenda in particular explains function pairs as isolated from each other. I thought it might be more constructive to explain how they relate to one another. I'd also like to know how you feel they relate to one another by your own words.
Hidden Agenda (Mobilizing Function) - Motivation - Hidden Agenda and Creative don't neglect each other
Ni - ESI/LSI - to understand
Si - EII/LII - to enjoy
Ne - LSE/ESE - to take advantage of opportunities
Se - LIE/EIE - to experience things
Fi - SLI/ILI - to create harmony
Ti - SEI/IEI - to have social understanding
Fe - ILE/SLE - to connect with others
Te - IEE/SEE - to act of their own accord
How duals provide (or produce) it for each other
LIE and ESI
LIE creatively provides understanding of experiences
ESI creatively provides new experiences to understand
LSE and EII
EII creatively provides opportunities to enjoy
LSE creatively provides enjoyment of opportunities
SLI and IEE
SLI creatively provides the ability to act of one's own accord based on a foundation for harmony
IEE creatively provides a foundation for harmony that allows acting of one's own accord
SEI and ILE
ILE creatively provides a social understanding that allows for connecting with other people
SEI creatively provides a connection with other people based on a social understanding of those people
etc.
Repression - Leading and Suggestive functions
LIE/LSE and ESI/EII
LIE/LSE is immersed in acting of their own accord to the point that they neglect harmony and will accept an ESI/EII to manage that for them
ESI/EII is immersed in creating harmony to the point that they neglect acting of their own accord and will accept an LIE/LSE to manage that for them as well
etc.
So? Anyone think this is better? Any major problems with it? Have your own ideas that you think are just better?