I know it's silly but it's fun so just go with it.
Fred
Velma
Daphne
Shaggy
Scooby
Scrappy? Really the show was way past its prime by then.
I know it's silly but it's fun so just go with it.
Fred
Velma
Daphne
Shaggy
Scooby
Scrappy? Really the show was way past its prime by then.
Fred -ESTj
Velma -a nerd
Daphne -ESFp
Shaggy -INFp
Scooby -pleasure seeking go along who only needs food to be happy and live a fulfilled life...lol ESFj
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 05-16-2010 at 02:48 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Scooby is ESTj.
Hmmmm I don't know. Maybe Alpha?
Fred: ILE
Velma: LII
Daphe: SEI
Shaggy: also SEI
Scooby: ? he's a cartoon dog. Let's see, ESE?
I don't know, I think it's hard to type a lot of fictional characters, let alone cartoon dogs. LOL
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I approve of Shaggy being SEI. He was always my favourite.
*goes and torrents scooby doo*
I watch these a lot thanks to my 8-year-old, and I really think Velma is a big ole Ti fest. In a good way.
And being a fictional character, she won't necessarily fit that well into one type anyway. She could be a bit of one and a bit of the other. The other thing is that she doesn't strike me as Se PoLR, but she wouldn't necessarily be consistent either.
I thought Alpha because I thought Velma seemed Ti-ish, and Shaggy seemed Si-ish. And then tried to fit them into Alpha. I think the tendency is for a lot of movies and shows to be more one quadra than balanced.
I just watched an episode, to refresh my mental image of the characters. In my opinion:
Fred: LSE
Velma: LII
Daphne: ESE
Shaggy: IEE
Scooby: Hard to tell. Fe-Ego?
It was so cheesy, it was hilarious and awesome.
Quaero Veritas.
hihi i loved Scooby as a kid!
Sincerely Yours,
Beyond the clouds. Beyond the sun.
The Rebel without a cause.
Scooby Doo was my all-time favorite cartoon when I was a kid.
Fred: Si-ESTj
Velma: Ti-INTj
Daphne: Fe-ESFj
Shaggy:Ne-ENFp (stereotypical)
Scooby:Fe-ISFp
How you people getting ESE for Daphne? I don't remember her saying much of anything in any of the shows. I gotta watch scooby doo again.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
ROOBY ROO RARE ARE ROO
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
I could picture maritsa as a ghost whose haunting socionists with her morphological methods and it becomes our job to stop her
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
"if it wasnt for those meddling 16types"
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
Certainly the later versions of Daphne (the 2002 cartoon series, the movies) have Daphne as ESE (she was played by Sarah Michelle Gellar in the movie, whom I type as ESE). Of course, there's not much to work with character-development-wise in the original cartoon -- she just seems to kind of fit the standard "popular girl" archetype that many ESEs fit into.
I am definitely doing too much research for this topic...
Quaero Veritas.