Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Type dispersal?

  1. #1
    Local Hero Saberstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Isle of Man
    TIM
    Robespierre
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Type dispersal?

    I saw somewhere, I think in our article section, a list of type dispersals like LSIs are 13% of men, but only 7% of women, and so on. Where is that article? It was a translation.
     
    God is most glorified when we are most satisfied in Him.
    - John Piper


    Socionics -
    the16types.info

  2. #2
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Extraverted
    Women Men
    64.34% 48.21%


    Introverted
    Women Men
    35.66% 51.79%

    Sensing
    Women Men
    92.22% 93.62%

    Intuitive
    Women Men
    7.78% 6.38%


    Emotional
    Women Men
    82.33% 22.45%

    Intellectual
    Women Men
    17.67% 77.55%

    Conceiving
    Women Men
    16.53% 31.89%

    Perceiving
    Women Men
    83.47% 68.11%
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  3. #3
    Local Hero Saberstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Isle of Man
    TIM
    Robespierre
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Where did you get that?
     
    God is most glorified when we are most satisfied in Him.
    - John Piper


    Socionics -
    the16types.info

  4. #4
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saberstorm View Post
    Where did you get that?
    My friend who ran an independent study
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,284
    Mentioned
    102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    My friend who ran an independent study
    What was the sample size and how accurate was the testing?

  6. #6
    A dusty and dreadful charade. Scapegrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    TIM
    ill
    Posts
    3,070
    Mentioned
    170 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's up to God.
    "[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan

    Brought to you by socionix.com

  7. #7
    A dusty and dreadful charade. Scapegrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    TIM
    ill
    Posts
    3,070
    Mentioned
    170 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    My friend who ran an independent study
    Ahahahahahahaha.ahahqwoarihw4a;etrwersy
    'gl4eatroih;w4hio;w4t


    Oh my god. khraesgtqertojpwte


    Maritsa has socionist friends that run "independent studies."

    My friend built one of these for my dog.

    "[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan

    Brought to you by socionix.com

  8. #8
    Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    East of the sun, west of the moon
    TIM
    SLI 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    13,706
    Mentioned
    196 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Narcotic View Post
    What was the sample size and how accurate was the testing?
    Maritsa's extended family and pretty accurate I'd say.
    “Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    You've done yourself a huge favor developmentally by mustering the balls to do something really fucking scary... in about the most vulnerable situation possible.

  9. #9
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There are no real type distribution statistics. For that we need a shallow system that fits the mold of a mass test. Like that one pop psychology that named itself after its test...

    My opinion is that all types carry about the same distribution, if I had to guess, worldwide. They surely seem to here, and intuition isn't some rare phenomenon like that of a wiz who philosophizes the big picture and spaces out about visions and fantasies. That's a shallow misconception brought on by intellectuals who feel isolated from the rest of the world. For most of us, intuition is an ordinary mental process that goes hand-in-hand with sensing. We relate to acting on information instinctually and holistically rather than directly specifying seen phenomena, it's basic human comprehension. If you don't believe me then try observing the slight differences in people instead of stereotyping them simply as intellectuals and normies. Honestly, everyone does both, but intuitives aren't going to so thoroughly orient themselves to exact information, the same as sensors aren't going to be so presumptuous about possible interpretations.
    Last edited by 717495; 04-03-2013 at 12:46 PM.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,284
    Mentioned
    102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, I've honestly come across insane amounts of intuitive people. I'd say that those popular MBTI population distribution statistics or ones like Maritsa's are completely unreliable.

  11. #11
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A lot of pop Socionics is MBTI, especially on the Russian sites. That's where people get that crap from.

  12. #12
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    Extraverted
    Women Men
    64.34% 48.21%


    Introverted
    Women Men
    35.66% 51.79%

    Sensing
    Women Men
    92.22% 93.62%

    Intuitive
    Women Men
    7.78% 6.38%


    Emotional
    Women Men
    82.33% 22.45%

    Intellectual
    Women Men
    17.67% 77.55%

    Conceiving
    Women Men
    16.53% 31.89%

    Perceiving
    Women Men
    83.47% 68.11%
    Too skewed.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    SLE/LSE sx/sp
    Posts
    2,470
    Mentioned
    76 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    My friend who ran an independent study
    You mean someone did a socionics study that wasn't sponsored?

  14. #14
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    According to my typelist.

    Male:
    E - 55,5%
    N - 48,0%
    T - 60,4%
    P - 50,8%
    ENTp - 7.88%
    ESTp - 8.50%
    ESFp - 6.25%
    ENFp - 4.88%
    INTp - 5.12%
    ISTp - 6.88%
    ISFp - 5.50%
    INFp - 6.00%
    INTj - 8.00%
    ISTj - 6.25%
    ISFj - 2.75%
    INFj - 3.75%
    ENTj - 7.38%
    ESTj - 10.50%
    ESFj - 5.12%
    ENFj - 5.25%


    Female:
    E - 55,6%
    N - 47,8%
    T - 43,9%
    P - 42,1%
    ENTp - 3.29%
    ESTp - 7.09%
    ESFp - 9.87%
    ENFp - 5.32%
    INTp - 6.84%
    ISTp - 1.52%
    ISFp - 3.04%
    INFp - 4.81%
    INTj - 6.33%
    ISTj - 5.82%
    ISFj - 7.59%
    INFj - 7.85%
    ENTj - 5.57%
    ESTj - 6.33%
    ESFj - 11.65%
    ENFj - 7.09%


    Dichotomic calculations include half-typed persons as well.

    This is more telling of types of people on my typelist than of society in general.

  15. #15
    lukasthere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Lisbon
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The list seems pretty good. Only a few types have a vast superior percentage on one sexual group compared to the other, and those are, by bias, expected. ESFj, INFj, ISFj (+women); ISTp and ENTp (+more men).

  16. #16
    &papu silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,077
    Mentioned
    456 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Filatova did a statistical study of 299 people which shows approximately even distribution of types. Her sample contained more intuitive types (60%) than sensing (40%); nearly 50/50 distribution of rationals/irrationals and introverts/extraverts among men and women; slightly higher percentage of men scoring as logical types (60% T) and slightly higher percentage of women scoring as ethical types (55% F) which is similar to MBTI figures. (in machine translations "FEL" is LSE, "OR" is ILI, "IEA" is IEE, and SLI comes up as "SSI").

    One of the results of this study was interesting - since she was typing families she looked into how types of children were related to types of parents and found a significant number of cases where the child is of dual type to mother and/or identical of the father.

    I also ran stats some time ago for my typings on the 16T spreadsheet, however, I don't think that the forum population is representative of the general population for multiple reasons.
    These are the results that I got from ~180 type entrees:

     

    ESE 5
    LII 25
    SEI 9
    ILE 20
    ALPHA 59 32.78%

    LSI 4
    EIE 9
    SLE 7
    IEI 25
    BETA 45 25.00%

    ILI 6
    SEE 3
    LIE 6
    ESI 8
    GAMMA 23 12.78%

    LSE 4
    EII 20
    SLI 9
    IEE 20
    DELTA 53 29.44%


     

    rational - 81 - 45.00%
    irrational - 99 - 55.00%

    introverts - 106 - 58.89%
    extroverts - 74 - 41.11%

    intuitive - 131 - 72.78%
    sensing - 49 - 27.22%

    ethical - 99 - 55.00%
    logical - 81 - 45.00%

    judicious - 112 - 62.22%
    decisive - 68 - 37.78%

    ne-ego - 85 - 47.22%
    ni-ego - 46 - 25.56%
    se-ego - 22 - 12.22%
    si-ego - 27 - 15.00%

  17. #17
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,724
    Mentioned
    250 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scapegrace View Post
    I want. But dog-size and stationary, like so:

    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •