polikujm's type

[717495]

Seeker of initial (logical)
(Recoverable - from the English. Extractor)

Abstractedly and thoughtful man. His attractive ideas have no direct connection with reality, such as philosophy, religion, bioenergetics and etc. His favorite occupation - a comparison between the different logical systems. Type armchair scientist. It is characterized by an asthenic figure. Sometimes angular movements, not paying attention to appearance, little health care.

lol

Let's see. Most importantly seeming, my intertype relations work with ENTp, but not with INTj. People on here have said I VI as and come off as an ENTp, and some have just said alpha (and especially noted that I look like Archon). Archon, Ashton, Nick, and whoever, used to type me as ENTp for some reason, said it was forum behavior, but as far as I can tell everyone retyped me as INTj because they think I'm niffweed's reincarnate or something. Sexy, if anything.

The above description is vague, however it does fit better than any of the INTj ones. Everything said on it is accurate, and the other descriptions I identify (if only a bit less) with are Ne-INTj and the INTp ones. I think of INTjs as rather rational and logical, where as I'm much more absent minded and thoughful in a sort of whimsical way. I could buy into the fact that Ti is my dominant function, if only it could be explained to me a little better. I'm not really into enneagram, but so far it seems like I'm some kind of 5, or that I come off that way. But it's not set in stone. Other enne-types I have identified with upon first glancing at it were 3, 4, possibly 1 6 and 9. Anyway I don't really know (need to learn it), but if I really am a type 5, I don't see why an Ti-ENTp can't foster it.

Ashton helped type my family and friends through VI and using descriptions, it seems like me as an ENTp would make the most sense in this model or whatever it is. Any arguments?

PS: I'll also add that some people think of me as INTp, and those are the only arguments I've gotten to hear.

[Gilly]

ILE-Ti works. You're a lot like Jake, only your vibe on cam is more contained, more rigid, less...pillow-like; you're probably 5w4 sx/so.

[717495]

I was just thinking that being a 5 might explain why I'm generally reclusive, quiet and not very social. I don't get out much and I'm not very proactive. Malia's ex bf was an ENTp, she said I reminded of him. He always hid behind his desk or something. Also since you know enneagram, I'll take your opinion so far.

Here are some pictures of me:

[Creepy-female]

lol

[717495]

Oh Gilly. Just looking at Christian Bale's face makes me happy.

[Gilly]

Dolphin has 999 posts.

[717495]

Depends on how you look at it.

[strrrng]

That Bale comparison is solid. I previously thought you were Ne-LII, primarily based on the fact that you VI introverted > extroverted, but your being a 5 and probably sx (which enhances internal concentration of energy) could probably explain this quality.

What are your thoughts on temperament?

[717495]

Lol strrrng. Your post made me laugh. You seem so into it.

[strrrng]

Very.

[717495]

I don't really know much about temperament, especially in the Ti-ENTp sense. I talked to Archon, and he basically identified to the thought that I can tend to go crazy around the house when nobody is home, but if someone is around, I'll sort of hide away and not move around much. I think I'm NT-social, so I solve a lot of my problems by hiding out. I can feel kind of exposed when I'm out, and I generally want to go back home and get comfortable again. However I can especially tend to get excited and jump around with music, and when I'm with my friends and nothing is happening, I'm the first one to sort of do something chaotic. My ISTj friend is kind of anal when I do something expressive, like sing or something. But I can tend to be the goofy one, and he sort of expects to laugh at what I do, and expects for me to entertain more than I expect him to. I relate to this highly crucial proclamation:

Type armchair scientist. It is characterized by an asthenic figure.

[strrrng]

lol. ENTp lankiness. Yeah, it seems a bit more difficult to discern here, given your e-type. I guess I'll just have to see more of you on cam (that means dancing).

[Not A Communist Shill]

I hope this helps!:

[ArchonAlarion]

LMAO

[717495]

Please be respectful with the photos.

[strrrng]

Yes, don't degrade polikjum by comparing him to Jesus.

[07490]

LOL, Subt

[eunice]

Dolphin, he's better looking than Christian Bale.

Anyway, polikujm, I have always thought you seem Ti-ENTp imo since day one.

On a side note, whatever happened to MaliaFee? I miss her posts!

[JohnDo]

Try to determine your benefactor!
I'm LII so I am much more attracted to IEIs than LSEs.
This should be the easiest way to find out if you are LII or ILE.

This method won't work with your dual because you will like both ESE and SEI...

If you see a female benefactor your heart should beat higher. If you see a female illusionary you might think "nice girl" but nothing more. Just try it out...

you like IEIs better --- you are LII
you like LSEs better --- you are ILE

[717495]

Okay, thanks for the advice. I'm leaving to go to the desert now.

Dolphin, he's better looking than Christian Bale.

Yes, don't degrade polikjum by comparing him to Jesus.

No I meant be respectful to the other photos. It is kind of funny that the picture of Bob Dylan looks like me. People thought I was ISFj when I first came here because of that.

[strrrng]

lol who thought you were ISFj?

[717495]

rubicon, starfall, ritella, and crazedrat.

See this thread: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...tml#post491318

That's actually me back in the chariot days, and everyone voted for ILE.

[strrrng]

Already back from the desert?

[crazedrat]

I was going to stick with ILI but actually ILE-Ti works

[JohnDo]

Most Harmonizing LIIs are typed Ti-ILE on this forum. I don't know why but this bias exists. You are probably Ni-LII in the DCNH system. That's why some people even say ILI.

[Jarno]

Alpha NT. I'm not sure which one.

Certainly not ILI.

Reason: your posts are hard to read, just like most alpha NT. Always saying something that's not relevant, from my point of view. This doesn't mean that it are bad posts, just totally impossible for me to relate.

[Waddlesworth]

Polikujm always had kind of that EP, emo-streak thing going, IMO.

[Absurd]

No I'm in the desert mother licker! Picks or gtfo?

[krieger]

You're not an INTj, that is an absolute certainty.

General advice and commentary:
If you need a subtyping to defend your typing, the typing is usually wrong.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[somavision]

to politely insist, is such a beautiful phrase.

[Jarno]

You're not an ILE.

Have a nice day.

And unless it is for petty amusement, I for the life of me cannot understand why a sensible young man such as yourself would even ask for this forum's opinion on your type. You are so un-ILE it is sickening in the vomit-inducing way.

Please go back to being ILI, stay there, and forget about this silly theory. Use your Ni and Te ego functions in a healthier manner. Time is of the essence, after all.

can't you see how totally different he is from the average ILI? I constantly misread his posts, he's probably LII if not ILE.

[717495]

Stop saying that Jarno. That is the only thing you say, and I don't think you're ILI (not like that really matters to me). So it's not supposed to convince me in any way. I can read everybodys' posts with limited ease. Surface details of yours, which don't account for anything socionics-wise, once again.

[717495]

Don't forget about:

PS: I'll also add that some people think of me as INTp, and those are the only arguments I've gotten to hear.

If anyone cares to investigate my type, they can ask me questions. But if I'm going to consider a new type, it will from now on be from somebody with an argument. I'm not in to consensus or mere opinion.

Everybody. Including aixelsyd (friend). A natural tendency to think I'm an ILI will be apparent if nobody gives reason elsewise. I made a poll so I can perhaps begin talking to people who think I am ILE, since nobody wants to naturally explain. Pinocchio, you sound incredibly closed minded, which is typical considering that you're probably LSI. No, I'm not into being an imperious cretin.

You are so un-ILE it is sickening in the vomit-inducing way.

Honestly, that's really what I think. LII is even a worse typing too. If the only thing that backs up my typing of ENTp is VI and intertype relations of people who are VIed, then simply put, "The cake is too hard. Where be me chainsaw?"

[717495]

This thread sickens me in the vomit-inducing way. I apologize.

Alpha couple:

[Jarno]

Stop saying that Jarno. That is the only thing you say, and I don't think you're ILI (not like that really matters to me). So it's not supposed to convince me in any way. I can read everybodys' posts with limited ease. Surface details of yours, which don't account for anything socionics-wise, once again.

you don't think I'm ILI?

Which type am I, now I'm getting curious.

[717495]

It doesn't matter what type I think you are, those kind of comparative arguments don't stand since I can't find any reason to think you're an ILI. The only personal reasons I don't think of you as an ILI are from having an impression of your character, and because people who I trust with socionics don't seem to think you are one either. So I'm not trying to convince you, or mean any harm by it. You can think what you want to think.

[Jarno]

and because people who I trust with socionics don't seem to think you are one either.

I think you should stop trusting them.

[717495]

I think you should stop trusting them.

No one is silent. Though some of us have a reason not to be.

[Jarno]

No one is silent. Though some of us have a reason not to be.

I have no clue what you mean by this. Again this supports the view that we are not the same type. But you've already confirmed that, so we're on the right road. Only now you have to see that I'm ILI. We could have a poll if you want to.