Whatever type George Orwell is, @Raver is the renascence of him. (Enneagram 6 self-type is spot on to me)
Whatever type George Orwell is, @Raver is the renascence of him. (Enneagram 6 self-type is spot on to me)
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
@Chae's comment has made me curious - do you think that if 3s integrate to 6 (i.e. become more healthy), they might be predisposed to write literature, produce music or visual art that a core 6 would relate to? I am trying to think of some examples of 3s. F. Scott Fitzgerald, J.S. Bach, George Gershwin, Andy Warhol?
If your intelligent sources knew about EII version beforhand, the value of that consensus is much lesser due to conformism.
I've pointed on strange things for EII, which remind me the communication with ESI. The video is the only way to add another intelligent source to those.
> To share a video with you for your personal enrichment, I'd at the least need something reciprocal from you.
I try to care about your correct type, not my enrichment. You may look at my photo as reciprocal. I changed not much from those times. Still 2 eyes, 2 ears and even 1 nose. And light hairs, certainly.
> I do think this is kind of funny: "You seem to don't like when people think about you by useing N." If I was a S type, wouldn't I be drawn toward those using N, because it is complementary to me?
ESI may don't like when people think about them by Ne assumptions, as it's nonvalued weak. Info whether a man did or did not something may be related to Ne. Also as the general context was guessing your type, what relates to Ne among N, then by inertia any assumptions may be perceived with Ne tinge.
> I tend to operate more abstractly and detachedly, so having people who kindly bring me back to concrete reality is nice.
People which mistake in own type also see traits of that type in own behavior. Filters may mislead them.
The ESI, which I mentioned, thought as own leading function for years her polr. And even after being typed to base Fi by most on socioforum, after having my arguments, after thinking herself as EII for several monthes and being sure in own introversion, now thinks IEE again. [edit: changed now to EII... again, what is wrong anyway]. She knows the theory and logical arguments, but filters somehow overcome all this. Also she's Nine, they may care more about "comfortable feelings" than reality, - her typical argument to think something as own type "it's comfortable for me".
Last edited by Sol; 11-24-2017 at 10:00 AM.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
@Cuivienen
You're an iei aka infj you piss of shit xD
I have found an iei just like u.
Go back to perc check spam world lol
http://personalitycafe.com/showthread.php?t=1176930
He's nicer though
lol that was long list
I think @cuivinen may be sp/sx because he's not charismatic or have social charm/likeability like a social second or first would. No offense. I don't find it an admirable or wanted quality. Maybe because I too am social last
Ah, typical IEI, passive-aggressive and spiteful.
@idontgiveaf deserved what she got. You can have sloppy seconds if you like though.
How was I being passive aggressive and spiteful? I was direct and said what I meant, which is the opposite of passive-aggression. It wasn't meant as something aggressive either. Like I said in my post I would not take offense if someone said I lacked charisma or likeability, becuase I definitely lack that. You're 3 so maybe you are more sensitive to criticism like that because you want to be charismatic as a 3. Which you probably are in ways, more than me. But I was just saying I don't see it in you as coming from the social instinct.
Last edited by maniac; 11-24-2017 at 11:27 AM.
@Sol is an lie or entj
Lol xD i actually figured out than I'm really an ILE and @Cuivienen is really an iei because we have "Illusionary" type of relationship
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/i...ps/Illusionary
It's like, i am actually annoyed by that bitch lol xD but then, i just cannot exile him completely. Like, you know we tend to not get along but then, probably being an illusionary inter type relationship which is like we're getting along with the Fe i think.
Because i usually get along with Fe types
I mean i don't know because I'm loving people i guess. and for me it's better to hangout in a group than on one on one. ;p
I think sol is my quasi identical
Because i talked with him before like sharing of ideas. We really see different views.
Your intent is not important. The effect you create is.
In case this hasn't been made clear enough to people here already: if I want your opinion on a personal matter, I will ask you for it, and what I say to you in private must stay private. I will not allow my life to be sliced and diced by the whole forum in some vindictive witch hunt.
No more virtue signalling. Mind your own business, and I'll mind mine.
Last edited by Spermatozoa; 11-24-2017 at 09:34 PM.
It's Internet ffs xD
If i am aware of social charm then I won't be noticed here nor anyone would not even know my existence
You know, in real life, i already tested that.
I'm actually naturally like this. "unconventional"
- But some people likes me. I gain friends for being myself as well as enemies
Then i tried for once being "conventional"
- I think i lose appeal. I am the type who doesn't exist. Because I'm part of everyone. I think i lose charm here because well, noone notices me for being "conventional" because everyone is.
So i conclude, being charming is not acting like one. It's being your awesome self.
Because everyone is the same. If you act like everyone else then you'll just be seen as everyone else. "normal"