This post has been removed.
Vi my ex? SLI or ILI
This post has been removed.
Last edited by Encrustacean; 03-13-2015 at 04:33 PM.
SLI imo. Doesn't look ILI at all.
I wouldn't be surprised.Originally Posted by McBain
He looks a lot like my ILI uncle but also a lot like my EII childhood friend so I'm not sure. I can also see why people are saying SLI.
i don't remember cpig looking like this at all. friend is edward norton's and chuck palahniuk's baby.very rascalishhhh
Does he find Ne annoying? Although I try to be nice to everyone, those bubbly personas who never stop talking due to their energetic ramblings can become grating after a short while and I have to escape to recharge.
He can still use Ne, especially through humor or endearment, while at the same time preferring Ni over Ne.
SLI>ILI by looks only.
I think she posted one pic of the guy before ... SLI, not ILI.
SLI by pictures
He's an S type. Based on that pic I can't tell and I would need more to be sure but the following stand out as possible SEE, SEI, SLI.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
SLI final
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
#ramblingon
Last edited by Aylen; 03-11-2015 at 06:43 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I'm in the looks-like-SLI camp.
That sounds so good on my new headphones!
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Neither SLI nor ILI. SLE. he seems pretty emotionally expressive -- smiling, making faces, etc. I think of Fe-PoLR types as being blank and expressionless for the most part. calm, quiet, unflappable, etc.
Any type can smile for photographs or when they're happy.
Yeah, I knew this was coming. Look, I didn't say "he smiles therefore not Fe-PoLR". I said he seems too emotionally expressive to be xLI. Not only is he smiling in several of these pictures, his smile is bright, cheerful, and expressive. He isn't just moving his lips into place. He's also making a face in one of the pictures. I feel like a Fe-PoLR would regard that as awkward.
Spider don't wanna get in the middle of this, just wanted to say that ILI's and SLI's can most certainly smile brightfully (sp?), cheerfully and expressively. Not claiming he's definitely SLI though...
I understand the request of this thread is to VI your ex, but no one here knows him better than you do. I personally find VI best if there's a lot of moods and expressions to choose from. In all of these pictures, he's clearly happy, but it feels like a very incomplete picture. That's why, in this case, I don't see VI as effective.
Also, VI is best combined with an idea of his strengths, weaknesses, behavior, how you as well as others perceived him without trying to bring socionics into it. In other words, supplying a more human representation than trying to explain a human being with a system. Then can the system be better applied once a clearer image is presented.
I dont see making funny faces as something Ne-valuing types are more likely to do. I dont think Ne really has anything to do with silliness or spontaneity. honestly, I feel like that stuff has more to do with Fe, which I see as carefree emotional expression. like when people randomly start singing off-key together, or when they start jokingly dancing in public, or making funny faces, or smiling bright and big for the camera, or pretending to be really mad and yelling at each other, I think they're engaging their Fe.
why?
why?
because he seems masculine and extroverted, not delicate and meek. because he seems to be connected to and at ease with his physical environment, not detached from and apprehensive about it. he seems comfortable in his space. in one of the photos, you're leaning over while he's driving and in doing so you're invading his space, and he doesnt seem to be bothered by it at all.
I'm probably reading way too much into this and I'll probably look back on this and wonder what the hell I was thinking, but at the moment this is how I feel.
to be honest its hard to say. I was thinking maybe SEI, IEI, or even LSI, but I really have no idea. ESI seems like a possibility too but that wouldnt make much sense if he really were SLE. I take it the chick is you? I'm curious, what would you guys fight about? conversely, what did you agree on?
also, I've got a couple pictures of someone who I think is ILI. I've known him since we were both in kindergarten, so basically since 1994. he got a degree in electrical engineering from the university of michigan and was always taking the highest level math classes when we were growing up. this is him smiling:
lol well as nice as it is to feel validated, I wouldnt put too much stock in it. if I saw the same pictures nowadays I'd probably type him something completely different. not to mention the fact that socionics tests suck. anyway, what's the status on ur self-typing??
whatever happened to ur type me video? I recall watching it and thinking ILE was a possibility
lol yeah, some people are just perplexing to type and it seems you're one of them.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
He ended up proposing to me on my birthday one year because I think he was afraid of losing me but he used the pretense that it was so I would have health insurance, so romantic. 
I got two engagement rings from him during the time we were together but we never dared talk about really going through with it or making any kind of plans. Guess it was all his way of staking claim to me without the full commitment and I was cool with that. I even stopped wearing the rings within weeks of getting them and he never cared or mentioned it. 
