Aww look at the trio of gang group supporting each other. So sweet. starfall my typing of you is not based on anything but information that I've observed. You seem to be ESE
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
A very good point, @troubadour. It is surely a SEE thing.
Last edited by Not A Communist Shill; 10-18-2016 at 07:14 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Subteigh, we are duals! This is by far the strongest argument for these typings.
I call myself batyote and I fight crime at night.
1981slater
Adam Strange
Airman
aixelsyd
Aliothalways
Alomoes
Ananke
Anglas
Animal
anndeliseescaping
applejacks
April
Avalonia
Aylen
Birdie
blackburry
Blaze
Blue
bolong
Bullets
BurningIce
Capitalist Pig
carrina
Chae
Chakram
chemical
chips and underwear
Chryssie
ClownsandEntropy
ConcreteButterfly
consentingadult
Contra
DaftPunk
Danali
darya
Default
Director Abbie
Drommel
echan
echidna1000
Eliza Thomason
Emmym
End
epheme
Erk
Eureka
Fay
FDG
FoxOnStilts
Galen
Ghost
glam
goldenbane
GuavaDrunk
Gypsy
Hacim
handjob
hatesyardwork
HERO
Hitta
IBTL
inumbra
Jack Oliver Aaron
jaein
Jarno
jason_m
jessica129
Joy
kalinoche
Kierva
Kim
Kissum
LauriesCrusador
leckysupport
lemontrees
LeShay
Lim
Logos
lungs EII
malna
Maritsa
matilda
May
Mega
MensSuperMateriam
mikemex
Minde
mu4
Muddytextures
Myst
n0ki
Narc
niffer
noid
nondescript
Nymeria
Oaky
octonot
Olduvai
Olga
ouronis
Pa3s
Park
Persephone
Person
peteronfireee
Phantom
Pink
PistolShrimp
Pole Ninja
Pookie
QuickTwist
ragnar
Raver
Rebelondeck
Reficulris
Resonare
Roro
rougerogue
ryoka14
Saberstorm
Satan
Scapegrace
ScarlettLux
shakealittle
silke
silverchris9
Simo
Simon
SisOfNight
SlavaPHP
Sol
SongOfSapphire
Soupman
squark
squirreltual
Starpoo
strangeling
strrrng
Subteigh
summerprincess
Supremacist
Suz
SyrupDeGem
Taknamay
tejing
The Ineffable
thehotelambush
TheJackal
Tigerfadder
totalize
Trevor
troubadour
UDP
uncivilized
unsuccessfull Alphamale
Velvet
Ver
Verbrannte
Waster
WithinRaison
Wontlythemoonbear
woofwoofl
Yaaroslav
yeves
yifflord
Zero11
@Anglas it is nice to see how much you care. <3
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
EII are highly tactful, but may joke as anyone. Lesser in form of sarcasm as more avoid to make bad feelings.
you may to be EIE, but Si types are doubtful
> After typing me IEI for years, I anger you once and you change my type to something completely different
get pleasure to deal with Fe types
mostly your behavior reminds IEI
I've watched you talk about people for years "ESE cannot live without contact with other people, they for her are highly valued. She’s inclined to exaggerate their characteristics and prefers not to note their “shadow” sides."
And how your emotions change
"During bad times she finds it difficult to hide her feelings, in such situations ESE attempts to get away from it all, preferring to suffer her troubles in isolation. She assumes that others will seek her out and share their happiness, which she’ll then increase.
Generally ESE suffers horribly in any conflict situation, even when she isn’t a direct participant: she’s easily emotionally entangled in quarrels and takes everything too close to heart."
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Such an exaggeration. I don't care about that thread except your ban did not follow logic
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh, how I couldn't stand to be anything like any of these example ESE people...
Originally Posted by Maritsa
I don't think I'd enjoy being in solitary confinement either, now that I think of it. Perhaps I am ESE as well.
Last edited by Pallas; 10-19-2016 at 01:14 AM.
Don't take this too seriously please (cause I'm not),
1981slater
Adam Strange - Doesn't come off as a strong extrovert; generally agreeable. Inclined to think ILI-Te or LIE-Ni
Airman
aixelsyd
Aliothalways
Alomoes
Ananke
Anglas
Animal
anndeliseescaping
applejacks
April
Avalonia
Aylen - seems playful and remote. Ni something. Probably beta.
Birdie
blackburry
Blaze
Blue
bolong
Bullets - I know he self-types IEI, but sometimes the stuff he says is so out there and just creative or borderline risque, I get a really Ne vibe from that.
BurningIce
Capitalist Pig - I could believe SLI. He's really into flying and such, like there's something really pleasant he gets out of it. Doesn't seem to like people that are very emotional (like Pewdiepie).
carrina
Chae
Chakram
chemical
chips and underwear - don't know. Doesn't take herself too seriously. I want to say Fe creative for some reason, maybe SEI, but I don't know.
Chryssie
ClownsandEntropy
ConcreteButterfly
consentingadult
Contra
DaftPunk
Danali
darya - not sure. Doesn't seem to stir the pot enough like a lot of EIEs, but maybe she's more EIE-Ni and not EIE-Fe.
Default
Director Abbie - I've never seen her joke or take sides in anything. I guess strictly socionics trait-speaking she would be Te something. But I wouldn't be surprised if she was more LSI-Se or something.
Drommel
echan
echidna1000
Eliza Thomason
Emmym
End
epheme
Erk
Eureka
Fay
FDG
FoxOnStilts
Galen
Ghost
glam
goldenbane
GuavaDrunk
Gypsy
Hacim
handjob
hatesyardwork
HERO
Hitta - Got Ti somewhere. Alpa-beta something. Makes weird assertions and takes them very seriously, then suddenly drops it completely. Seems to want to fuck with people and believes Astrology is somehow better at explaining people than anything else. I just don't know. He seems to have Ni with some Ti thrown in. But doesn't have the social graces of an Fe type. Actually ILI-Ni with a weird fixation on Ti seems...I don't know...the most logical conclusion to me?
IBTL
inumbra
Jack Oliver Aaron
jaein
Jarno
jason_m
jessica129
Joy
kalinoche
Kierva
Kim
Kissum
LauriesCrusador
leckysupport
lemontrees
LeShay
Lim
Logos
lungs
malna
Maritsa
matilda
May
Mega
MensSuperMateriam
mikemex
Minde
mu4
Muddytextures
Myst
n0ki
Narc
niffer
noid
nondescript
Nymeria
Oaky
octonot
Olduvai
Olga
ouronis
Pa3s
Park
Persephone
Person - makes really weird socionics claims sometimes and seems really adamant about being EII, despite not seeming to have any social grace. Also tends to come off snotty to me. No idea what his type is, though I want to say he's some Fe-PoLR.
peteronfireee
Phantom
Pink
PistolShrimp
Pole Ninja
Pookie
QuickTwist
ragnar
Raver - forms cogent opinions, while still being agreeable when talking with people. No idea on type.
Rebelondeck
Reficulris
Resonare
Roro
rougerogue
ryoka14
Saberstorm
Satan - I could see LSI-Se or SLE-Ti. More inclined to SLE-Ti from his reserved overwatching posts and comments. Doesn't get too involved in pushing introverted claims. But I guess either type could make as much sense to me.
Scapegrace
ScarlettLux
shakealittle
silke
silverchris9
Simo
Simon
SisOfNight
SlavaPHP
Sol
SongOfSapphire
Soupman
squark
squirreltual
Starpoo - kind of relate a lot to her social awkwardness that she's talked about. Seems pretty removed in her thinking. I don't know why, but that kind of makes me think either ILI-Ni or IEI-Ni.
strangeling - the shit type
strrrng
Subteigh
summerprincess
Supremacist
Suz
SyrupDeGem
Taknamay
tejing
The Ineffable - I miss reading his posts. He used to make a lot of Ti conclusions and claims, but not take them too seriously, and it would make me laugh. Ti creative makes sense, probably ILE because of the tangential thought patterns he always has.
thehotelambush
TheJackal
Tigerfadder
totalize - Seems extremely well-read and seems to have spent a fair amount of time organizing and elucidating his thoughts on things, which I don't find common with SEEs. SEE or LIE could be accurate, but I'm inclined to LIE-Ni based on that.
Trevor
troubadour
UDP
uncivilized
unsuccessfull Alphamale
Velvet
Ver
Verbrannte
Waster
WithinRaison
Wontlythemoonbear
woofwoofl
Yaaroslav
yeves
yifflord - is this the dude with the whoselineisit avatar? If so, strikes me as someone that comes her to have questions answered or make short comments.
Zero11
Well I agree with a great deal of the self-typings here at 16types.info but then there are some self-typings here on the forum that I disagree with, and sometimes I feel sure about an alternative type for that person, and in some cases I say so and discuss why I think so. For example, Subteigh knows that to me he seems everything like ILI and definitely NOT like EII. I don' t mind saying so because I don't think I am hurting his feelings (he has no problem at all ignoring what he thinks are my faulty opinions). But some people take offense, and now, having offended some folks sometimes by telling them what I think their type is, I accept that some people don't want to know what I think especially if I think they are a different type. So, filling out this list is a difficulty for me. I like reading what others think of others, though. I just don't want to make anyone mad (since I have before).
To me the distinction between someone who mainly uses a Sensing function vs. an Intuitive function is one of the more obvious things, and its one of the area of disagreements I find with people.
Here are a few of the people whose self-type I feel sure of, and a few of the ones I personally re-type. If you are not on the list and you know I know you, know that its not a high chance that I think you are mistyped, but just that I am not altogether positive of it. I generally do not retype a person until I get quite sure, and then I don't say so unless I am sure i won't offend. So here is a very little list:
@Adam Strange - LIE
@Ananke - SLE
@Andreas - EII (or maybe IEE)
@applejacks - IEE
*April is adorable* (and maybe a Beta?)
@Aylen - IEI
@Capitalist Pig - (sometimes I get a Delta vibe)
@circles are neat - IEE
@Director Abbie - LSE
Eliza Thomason - IEE
@Galen - ILI (this seems a right typing to me)
@goldenbane - EIE
@inabox - IEE
@jessica129 - SLI
@lungs - ESI
@Maritsa - EII
@Minde - EII
@mu4 - ILE
@Park - LSI
@Persephone - IEI
@Raver - I think SLI is a possibility
@silke - IEI
@Subteigh -ILI
@Suz - I think probably Alpha. Something interesting.
Last edited by Eliza Thomason; 11-14-2016 at 05:21 AM.
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
Some people who have definitely posted a lot on forum and/or on shoutbox have been left out of this list.
@Hacim - why Creative DCNH for me?
Only posting about disputed ones (disputed here or elsewhere):
@666 - Ni ego, not LIE
@Adam Strange - LIE-Te
@Bane - LIE-Ni>EIE-Ni
@Capitalist Pig - gamma NT works
@chips and underwear - LII of the softer kind (Harmonizing or something)
@Chryssie - god knows. some Feeling type most likely.
@darya - EIE-Ni no question
@Director Abbie - I've seen her joke. not taking sides is very Te>Ti. have no problem with Delta for her and LSE makes sense okay.
@Hitta - alpha NT, too much Ne to be anything else.
@inumbra - I agree with IxI-H. Probably ILI over IEI.
@lungs - ESI-Fi still seems fine
@Mega - didn't draw enough final conclusions yet but xIE seems okay
@Person - EII alright.
@Shiver - ILE>LII
@Subteigh - EII alright.
@totalize - LIE, agree on reasoning posted for that.
@Verbrannte - EIE/ILI
Btw. You people all seem to idealize EII or something...
Last edited by Myst; 10-19-2016 at 04:42 PM.
Yeah, the search options don't account for chatbox shouts and I regret that some people like @Shiver got left out. I just didn't want to include all the random lurkers or people who made one thread and left. And I wasn't gonna hand pick the entire thing. Feel free to add to it, of course.
@Myst - EIE/ILI is an interesting typing. You must be using Reinins and such or else I'd expect EIE/IEI or LIE/ILI. Anyways, I love how you hand out a lot more judging and/or extravert types than most. The first rule of 16types seems to be everyone is Ip until proven otherwise, and god forbid we get all the way to Ej rather than Ep or Ij.
Have you ever considered ESE for Abbie? I mean she's definitely xSE but I tend to think I'm seeing some over . Also intertype and Reinins. I don't think LSE is bad obviously, I just want to make sure.
She's not hysterical and is tedious. LSE fits better than ESE.
Just read that. It looks like an accounting report, but is about celebrating of Christmass.
You've gotten wrong understanding of types based on your mistyped examples. When noticing contradictory to the theory, instead of doubting in own typing you've prefered to refuse the basics of the theory. So when something looks, sounds and smells like elephant it's a giraffe for you, and your argument is "You people all seem to idealize elephants".
Last edited by Sol; 10-19-2016 at 05:37 PM.
@Sol Theory makes a good servant but a poor master. If the theory doesn't work for you change it. You're the one who typed an obvious SLI as an EIE conflictor, so what can I expect?
It's a list of guidelines for participating in an anonymous gift exchange so I'm not surprised at all that it looks like it does. It's great to have a grasp of the basics of a theory, but if your understanding of context is off, how can you be sure those basics are being applied properly?
I don't use Reinin, I simply see you as Ni ego and so far only excluded IEI and LIE.
I didn't know there was an Ip bias here.
Pretty sure Director Abbie is not Fe base, she's a bit too dry for that.
How the holy flying fuck can you accuse me like this without having any evidence? Do you just dislike me or something? Fuck off with your bs.
@Myst, well, both EIE and ILI are Obstinate and Negativist so I thought you might have seen that. They have the same of Gulenko's cognitive styles if you use that too. So, would you please tell me what your reasoning is then? I'm surprised I'm not ubiquitously considered LIE somehow, since everyone is like "you're the most logical person" (pfft no) and then other stuff.
Yeah, people want to type like half or more of the women IEI or SEI and the men ILI or SLI from what I've seen. It's sort of absurd. Ep is fairly common as well, Ij less, and Ej the least (except the individual type EII, which people are reluctant to hand out for a combination of "it's a special snowflake Homo superior" and "Maritsa says no" reasons despite being basically exactly as common as any other type. The existence of EII is the only reason Ep seems to be more common than Ij, since besides that people have a strong tendency to assume everyone is introverted, but since 1/4 of the Ij types are off limits that tips it over).
Everybody loves me because I'm Harmonizing!
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP