Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 128

Thread: Low Empathy problem

  1. #1
    summerprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    US
    TIM
    IEI 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    553
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Low Empathy problem

    Soo, I'm not a psychopath and I care about people in general and the good of the human race but I got a 23 out of 80 on the empathy quotient test. Does anyone else have a low score and what can we do to fix it? Is this some indication I should switch my type? I don't think I have Asperger's syndrome either....
    Here's the link: https://psychology-tools.com/empathy-quotient/

  2. #2
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My score was 17. I don't think it's a problem, or that there is anything to fix.

  3. #3
    summerprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    US
    TIM
    IEI 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    553
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    My score was 17. I don't think it's a problem, or that there is anything to fix.
    Well I think it's a problem I want to showcase empathy to get along better with my duals and with people in general. I'm not that argumentative and I can be quite friendly so it comes down to becoming more aware of others' feelings.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Wait, if you're low on empathy, why would you think you're IEI? That would completely defeat the purpose of your dual being SLE. If both have low ethics, that wouldn't make any sense, would it?

  5. #5
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think people scoring very high on this test are not necessarily high in empathy - they are just more delusional, thinking that they know what other people are thinking/feeling when they don't.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    I think people scoring very high on this test are not necessarily high in empathy - they are just more delusional, thinking that they know what other people are thinking/feeling when they don't.
    Well, it's not exactly like emotions are all that "sane" in the first place lol

    But, of course you can't actually know, because its someone else's mind. Even if you guess at their inner states and ask them, they could tell you yes and just be lying lol

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    TIM
    IEI-Fe-DCh so/sx
    Posts
    1,295
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i scored 54/80. in real life i have very high empathy, though.
    i've seen that empathy is associated with the social instinct, but i'm not sure whether this is true. from my experience it's at least plausible. (i guess there exist different forms of empathy which may be connected to the other instincts)

  8. #8
    Thelema's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    TIM
    468 so/sx
    Posts
    18
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Are you sure you care about people? lol.

    I could be wrong, but I think IEI is the type I have most experience with. You seem caring, gentle, and personal. Superficially. You can say pleasant things, and heal people. You know what people like. That's Fe creative + Fi demonstrative. But in essence, you don't really care that much. Fi is not a priority to you. You care about your ideals, dreams, and about creating a pleasant emotional atmosphere. Think about it, your dual is the SLE. Fi PoLR. Only someone who is cold inside can dualize and tame a type like this. And you do that well.


    INFjs and ISFjs, though, are your opposites. They seem standoffish and even cold. They are not charismatic, and they do not create pleasant emotional atmosphere too much. But on a deeper level, they focus on people.
    "If Will stops and cries Why, invoking Because, then Will stops & does nought. If Power asks why, then is Power weakness".



  9. #9
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your duals just like company and someone to have fun experiences with. I show my empathy with LSE by listening and encouraging them to do the things that they like because it's their goal. I think your duals appreciate having someone around to go eat good food with, to see sunsets at the beach with, etc. I don't know how you would use empathy in that case. They don't like people feeling sorry for them. They don't need that. They need someone to give delicious stuff to and someone who they can play music to
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got 27/80 on that test and people generally find that I'm quite empathetic in private. I'd take that test with a grain of salt. How the fuck does keeping up with trends have anything to do with empathy?

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thelema View Post
    Are you sure you care about people? lol.

    I could be wrong, but I think IEI is the type I have most experience with. You seem caring, gentle, and personal. Superficially. You can say pleasant things, and heal people. You know what people like. That's Fe creative + Fi demonstrative. But in essence, you don't really care that much. Fi is not a priority to you. You care about your ideals, dreams, and about creating a pleasant emotional atmosphere. Think about it, your dual is the SLE. Fi PoLR. Only someone who is cold inside can dualize and tame a type like this. And you do that well.


    INFjs and ISFjs, though, are your opposites. They seem standoffish and even cold. They are not charismatic, and they do not create pleasant emotional atmosphere too much. But on a deeper level, they focus on people.
    Gracias.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    "Your Empathy Quotient score was 78 out of a possible 80."

    This isn't testing for empathy at all. This is testing for INFj.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Starfall View Post
    Lmao

    Haven't taken the test but squark is probably right.
    Starfall, I don't dislike you or have anything against you at all, but you're not thinking straight on this one. I lie. A lot. Wait. No, that's not the lie. Keep going.

  14. #14
    No Fate Pole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    TIM
    LSI-Se
    Posts
    814
    Mentioned
    100 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I always scored super low in empathy and high for asperger's but never sought a specialist to confirm. People don't have issue with me so it's not a problem for me. I do have empathy and I don't score high for NPD.
    LSI-Se 836 Sp/Sx

  15. #15
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,800
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    26/80

    I think I'm decently empathic when in direct contact with people but I am not at all empathic towards things that do not effect me. For example, I don't give two flying shits about any of the stuff I hear happen on news but I will never intentionally be a dick to someone in their face.

    In response to the OP, I think the fact that you are worried about not being empathic enough is in itself a sign you are ethical. A person truly low in ethics wouldn't even see it as a topic worthy to bring up.
    Last edited by Muddy; 01-24-2016 at 04:57 AM.

  16. #16
    summerprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    US
    TIM
    IEI 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    553
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muddytextures View Post
    26/80

    I think I'm decently empathic when in direct contact with people but I am not at all empathic towards things that do not effect me. For example, I don't give two shits about any of the stuff I hear happen on news but I will never intentionally be a dick to someone in their face.
    I care a lot about what happens on the news and to me it feels like my responsibility as a human being to help fix societal problems and improve peoples' lives. This is why I know I'm not some sort of sociopath. That's funny because I can be rude to peoples' faces if I don't like them, but I have this ..commitment to solving overarching problems and I want to do my duty as a person.

  17. #17
    summerprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    US
    TIM
    IEI 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    553
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Starfall View Post
    I think you were the one who posted a thread about BPD? If you do in fact have BPD, this is probably the reason for scoring low on empathy. It's not that BPD's can't ever feel empathy, it's just that their emotions are so strong that it's difficult to feel much of anything else. The good thing is that at least you are self aware of this issue and seek to fix it. There has been a lot of success with BPD and Dialectical behavior therapy.

    Some people who have BPD are also on the spectrum for NPD, which unfortunately feels empathy to an even lesser degree.
    I don't think that I have BPD just that I have some of its traits. I'm definitely not as impulsive, aggressive or self harming

  18. #18
    summerprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    US
    TIM
    IEI 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    553
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thelema View Post
    Are you sure you care about people? lol.

    I could be wrong, but I think IEI is the type I have most experience with. You seem caring, gentle, and personal. Superficially. You can say pleasant things, and heal people. You know what people like. That's Fe creative + Fi demonstrative. But in essence, you don't really care that much. Fi is not a priority to you. You care about your ideals, dreams, and about creating a pleasant emotional atmosphere. Think about it, your dual is the SLE. Fi PoLR. Only someone who is cold inside can dualize and tame a type like this. And you do that well.


    INFjs and ISFjs, though, are your opposites. They seem standoffish and even cold. They are not charismatic, and they do not create pleasant emotional atmosphere too much. But on a deeper level, they focus on people.
    Loll, I am standoffish and cold. My parents have told me that since the beginning of time! I make an effort to be charismatic/create an emotional atmosphere so people will like me but this was definitely learned over time haha. It is true that I care about my own ideals and dreams more though as you said.

  19. #19
    Attis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    TIM
    RLOEI 6w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    390
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    21/80. I don't feel that I'm particularly lacking in empathy.

  20. #20
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thelema View Post
    Are you sure you care about people? lol.

    I could be wrong, but I think IEI is the type I have most experience with. You seem caring, gentle, and personal. Superficially. You can say pleasant things, and heal people. You know what people like. That's Fe creative + Fi demonstrative. But in essence, you don't really care that much. Fi is not a priority to you. You care about your ideals, dreams, and about creating a pleasant emotional atmosphere. Think about it, your dual is the SLE. Fi PoLR. Only someone who is cold inside can dualize and tame a type like this. And you do that well.


    INFjs and ISFjs, though, are your opposites. They seem standoffish and even cold. They are not charismatic, and they do not create pleasant emotional atmosphere too much. But on a deeper level, they focus on people.
    She does come off more pleasant than myself because she laughs a lot "haha" and she let's you know she's having fun.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  21. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    TIM
    f a g g o t
    Posts
    385
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quit shitting yourself, none of your brain's working if you're taking an online test seriously. Avoid them altogether.

  22. #22
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,372
    Mentioned
    112 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by summerprincess View Post
    I want to showcase empathy.
    I haven't looked at the test so I don't know if it's valid or not, but if it is what you posted above could be apart of the problem. Wanting to be seen as something in the eyes of others is often indicative of someone less pre-occupied with being what they want to be than they are with other people seeing them as such. In addition, the act of continually projecting an Image to be seen as such is directly correlatable with narcissism which kills empathy.

    But as far as constructive advice, Fake it until you Make it is both applicable to cultivating empathy and, if you have little, really the only way it can grow.
    Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LSI Pole Ninja View Post
    I always scored super low in empathy and high for asperger's but never sought a specialist to confirm. People don't have issue with me so it's not a problem for me. I do have empathy and I don't score high for NPD.
    You realize that if you had that confirmed, you'd have an easier time getting a regular job that pays well, right?

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by summerprincess View Post
    Loll, I am standoffish and cold. My parents have told me that since the beginning of time! I make an effort to be charismatic/create an emotional atmosphere so people will like me but this was definitely learned over time haha. It is true that I care about my own ideals and dreams more though as you said.
    "to be charismatic/create an emotional atmosphere" is Fe
    "so people will like me" is Fi
    You just equated the two ethics, which is a sign of low ethics.

    As others have said, you're displaying the desire to appear ethical, which is very different than being ethical.

  25. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    I haven't looked at the test so I don't know if it's valid or not, but if it is what you posted above could be apart of the problem. Wanting to be seen as something in the eyes of others is often indicative of someone less pre-occupied with being what they want to be than they are with other people seeing them as such. In addition, the act of continually projecting an Image to be seen as such is directly correlatable with narcissism which kills empathy.

    But as far as constructive advice, Fake it until you Make it is both applicable to cultivating empathy and, if you have little, really the only way it can grow.
    You ever read the dual descriptions by strat? IEI is basically described as an amorous narcissist.

    The test actually had like 25% (random estimate) of the questions being directly j, another 25% being intuition, and the remainder being Fi.

  26. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by summerprincess View Post
    Is this some indication I should switch my type?
    Without normal typing data like videointerview your type is unknown.
    While psychological tests are not perfect and may give bullshit sometimes. Well known MBT gave retyping match only 30%, for example.

  27. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tonka View Post
    I got 27/80 on that test and people generally find that I'm quite empathetic in private. I'd take that test with a grain of salt. How the fuck does keeping up with trends have anything to do with empathy?
    Empathetic or sympathetic? Empathy is the pliability of your internal world to the emotional states of others. What you do from there is something completely separate.

    Keeping up with trends is no different than keeping up with others wants and desires, which allows you to better empathize with their concerns.

  28. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Without normal typing data like videointerview your type is unknown.
    While psychological tests are not perfect and may give bullshit sometimes. Well known MBT gave retyping match only 30%, for example.
    Take the empathy test lol

  29. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy8419 View Post
    Take the empathy test lol
    I just don't care what they say.

  30. #30
    summerprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    US
    TIM
    IEI 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    553
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy8419 View Post
    "to be charismatic/create an emotional atmosphere" is Fe
    "so people will like me" is Fi
    You just equated the two ethics, which is a sign of low ethics.

    As others have said, you're displaying the desire to appear ethical, which is very different than being ethical.
    That's just how I think. I'm not particularly logical either and always have my head in the clouds so who knows what my type is at this point. But everybody wants others to like them and it's just lying to myself if I say I'm being friendly for no reason. Being friendly makes for a funner environment and makes others happy, and in turn makes them easier to get along with.

  31. #31
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,806
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got 42 at this. I think my approach is similar to what @Muddytextures wrote, I´d never actively be an asshole to someone but if some kind of happening is completely out of my "direct" realm, I won´t care about it.

    Say some guy got badly wounded during a war, if he was transferred to a hospital near me and I could help I´d likely feel in need to do so, but if he was somewhere very far away I would probably not even register its happening.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  32. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got 34 out of 80, even although I consider myself to be quite an insensitive and not a particularly nice person, so I am surprised it's higher than 30.

    Things that happen far away, for instance on the news, tend not to bother me unless it is something close to my heart, so I picked slightly agree, some subjects I have read about or watched have got me very upset.

  33. #33
    hiatus
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    تخت نور
    Posts
    373
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've always thought the ability to "put yourself in another person's shoes" was correlated with high intuition. Not necessarily feeling what the other person is feeling, but imagining what your life would be like if certain circumstances affected you. I realize that this is but a portion of empathy.

    SFs are highly emotional but often have a hard time with more theoretical situations, seemingly being limited by their own sensations and avoiding hypotheticals.

    NTs have high intuition and should be able to imagine their lives being affected by a circumstance that does not presently concern them, however they may have a hard time dealing emotionally with the problems of others.

    Going by this, we can conclude that NFs are generally the most "empathetic" types and STs are generally the least so. SFs and NTs should be in the middle somewhere, depending on type and sub-type, as they both possess some, but not all, of the traits related to empathy.

    And yes, by definition, EIIs should be the most empathetic type. However, I would question the objectivity of one's self-conception if they were to score near the maximum of that poorly written test.

  34. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hacim View Post
    I've always thought the ability to "put yourself in another person's shoes" was correlated with high intuition. Not necessarily feeling what the other person is feeling, but imagining what your life would be like if certain circumstances affected you. I realize that this is but a portion of empathy.

    SFs are highly emotional but often have a hard time with more theoretical situations, seemingly being limited by their own sensations and avoiding hypotheticals.

    NTs have high intuition and should be able to imagine their lives being affected by a circumstance that does not presently concern them, however they may have a hard time dealing emotionally with the problems of others.

    Going by this, we can conclude that NFs are generally the most "empathetic" types and STs are generally the least so. SFs and NTs should be in the middle somewhere, depending on type and sub-type, as they both possess some, but not all, of the traits related to empathy.

    And yes, by definition, EIIs should be the most empathetic type. However, I would question the objectivity of one's self-conception if they were to score near the maximum of that poorly written test.
    Are you considering the distinction between empathy and sympathy?
    http://www.diffen.com/difference/Empathy_vs_Sympathy

    EIIs aren't the most empathetic type? No matter how you spin "empathy," it is still on the ethics spectrum. Both ESI and EII have the same dimensionalities of ethics. The test isn't testing for Empathy, it's testing for specifically EII. Look at the questions... You have ethics questions, intuition questions, rationality questions, and Te questions.

    The reason why so many are getting such low scores is so extremely obvious, but I am at a loss for how to help people see it. @Muddytextures Pretty sure you partially see it.

    @mu4 @Contra @Reficulris y'all take this and wakeup please

  35. #35
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy8419 View Post
    The reason why so many are getting such low scores is so extremely obvious
    This test was done for hard psychiatric patients. I doubt it was ever checked on validity for ordinary people.

  36. #36
    Robot Assassin Pa3s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Germany
    TIM
    Ne-LII, 5w6
    Posts
    3,629
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    16/80

    „Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
    – Arthur Schopenhauer

  37. #37
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,223
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    This test was done for hard psychiatric patients. I doubt it was ever checked on validity for ordinary people.
    I've checked it. Do it yourself if you want to check it too. We're on an internet forum.

  38. #38
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default


    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  39. #39
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    20

  40. #40
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,800
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hacim View Post



    Going by this, we can conclude that NFs are generally the most "empathetic" types and STs are generally the least so. SFs and NTs should be in the middle somewhere, depending on type and sub-type, as they both possess some, but not all, of the traits related to empathy.
    I agree with this assessment.

    For NFs empathizing and helping others is pretty much their reason for existence. For many of them its their primary tool for surviving since they often are lacking in other areas.

    Many STs completely reject the notion of "giving in" to others and prefer to get what they want through force, intimidation, or their own practical know-how .

    NTs like STs don't really care much about others but unlike STs they are willing to tolerate and be flexible with others when necessary since they are aware of their vulnerability.

    SFs care about people as much as NFs but often misinterpret the exact needs and wants of others and end up giving kids socks for christmas.
    Last edited by Muddy; 01-25-2016 at 01:56 AM.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •