A lot of people overestimate the degree to which Se is evil. Se is used by both the people who cause atrocities AND by those who prevent them by stopping those who would commit them. It is somehow only the former that get remembered.
A lot of people overestimate the degree to which Se is evil. Se is used by both the people who cause atrocities AND by those who prevent them by stopping those who would commit them. It is somehow only the former that get remembered.
FF7 has some good examples of the different evils:
Alpha: Professor Ghast (probably Alpha NT, but not much to go on) breeding Sephiroth and the Jenova project (Alpha tends to "open pandora's box," so to speak)
Beta: Sephiroth (IEI) becoming consumed with his conception of his "destiny" and becoming willing to destroy the world/commit genocide in order to embody his own personal ideals and reunite with his mother
Gamma: Shinra Corp. sucking the life out of the planet without regard for its consequences
Not really a great example of Delta evil there, though.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I've observed that there are actually two kinds of evil for each quadra. The one's I've been discussing are mostly the archetypal examples of over-usage of valued functions, but I think there is another kind of evil for each quadra, namely when they begin using their shadow side, or the methods of their opposing quadra, to acheive the goals that their values dictate.
Alpha: Abusing wealth or influence in order to pursue interests or preserve an overly opulent lifestyle
Beta: Lulling others into a false sense of security in order to overcome them or coercively promote ideals
Gamma: Using creative ingenuity and manipulation of others' innocence or carnal desires in order to accumulate wealth and influence
Delta: Using cunning and force "behind the scenes" to preserve peace or manipulate consensus
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I haven't seen this, but it seems plausible with their weak Ni.
Anyway, Louis retreated into a pretty little world of hedonism and creative thought, while everything around him was falling apart. That's something I associate more with SEI with their Te devaluing, than SLI. He was still willing to make very radical policy changes throughout his reign, they just came sporadically and did little good.
I think an SLI would be more willing to put in the work to change things, but react badly to the idea of completely overhauling institutions and prefer to make minor adjustments instead, so his changes may or may not be worth it in the end.
Actually upon second thought I realized that it falls into the second category of Alpha behavior that I proposed.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I was going to say... the most evil quadra is the opposing quadra.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
imo Gamma and Beta values can make one pretty evil. There was something based on "war" and "structure" dichotomies around .... Gamma > warlike and organized, Beta > warlike and chaotic.
Guys, can't we all just get along and agree to disagree?
@Director Abbie, is this multiple choice? If so, I wanted to vote for every single one except the one I am in.
Evil... hahahhahahaa. Oh man. EVIL!
I love sephiroth. My favorite villain... of any video game. Especially when he pins that massive sword in the Shinra head to his desk. I've told my sister when I am diagnosed with cancer, the head of Tyson chicken I am finding him and putting a long sword into him pinning him to his desk in the same manner if possible.
clearly an ethnic cleansing of betans is called for.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Proposition:
I will have to consolidate some but it can be done. Ya'll fuel my fire.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Gammas want to take over the world. Betas just want to watch the world burn.
whoa.. I actually think this is pretty spot on.
For the record some of the people I'd deem as some of the shittest, most manipulative people I've met in my life have been Beta. (I should say ..tried to be the most manipulative people... It all seems so transparent from my standpoint..I'm shocked people actually fell for it).
pretty much ever beta i know is tame and vanilla compared to this dumb stereotype. i am of course including the people on this forum.
^ that was informative
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I'm sure it was...
Betas, but I still like 'em.
if what you're arguing is that the representative LSI is a hardass, then yes, my picture is more valid than yours.
if you were referring to "hardass LSIs" with the knowledge that they are not a representative sample, then our pictures aren't that different... although it'd be curious why you'd bring up such a non-rebuttal in the first place.
Ewwe, thus spoke Xerx. What I was arguing was almost crystal clear. From my experience with Betas, I saw the most "potential for evil" in representatives of the Logical-Rational type. But carry on ... I insist. If you really want your picture of a sociotype to me more valid than mine. Yes, you can.
i'm kind of worried that the less aware people here will just interpret the verdict in this thread as being exaggerated or even caricatured, to the effect of being essentially right at its core but presented in an artificially maximized contrast, when the truth is it's wrong in a much deeper sense than that.
ps. its fucking annoying when people think doing this is "wise"; morons.
the opposite one
their kind of evil annoys the most
Deltas
Alpha- Chaotic Neutral
Beta- Chaotic Evil
Gamma- Lawful Evil
Delta- Neutral Evil
Alphas aren't intentionally evil but everyone else is.
Ne/Si quadras
Idle hands are the devil’s tools