Ugh
Lori Painter
Ugh
She's annoying. I didn't even watch the whole thing. Some Ej maybe.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
yep, EXXj is all i get from her.
Eh, the voice isn't much different than those of other people who try to show a happy-get-going attitude to the world.
I didn't care for her message, myself. On the one hand I can see what she's aiming for. On the other hand many people we interact with have any number of biases and misunderstandings which could create some socio-economic issues, depending on their response to what they witness. This leads to acting in ways that the viewer would find acceptable, rather than what the actual individual finds acceptable. I've no desire to live my life according to the expectations of others.
Also, seriously, is she going to suggest that when she pees/poops and when she has sex and/or orgasms...that she's imagining herself on camera??
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
She's not LSE; she's SEE.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I believe she's saying that morally one ought to behave in private just as one does in public and vice versa instead of maintaining double standards. Tempted to cheat on a test or a diet or a deal? Act as if someone is watching, perhaps the "higher self" she alluded to, and behave as if your actions and their moral consequences would be known to the world. As our little buddy Kant said, "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law." Kind of a high bar to clear, eh?
Wookie, my duals don't talk like that; they have very little emotional expression when addressing the public and are all about getting to the point and express their plan/idea in an algorithmic sense.
For example:
Ask an LSE, "how would you live your life?"
Try to make sure I was doing things that were worth while, have good relationships that are healthy and not detrimental, ideally a life where I don't have to make apologies to others for the way I live it.
You see and LSE, algorithmic thinking works like this
A is the question
from A, they will divide that to B, C, and D; but if an LSE needs to express or further broaden their point on B, they will say it when they say the point B; so it will look like A>B1; B2; C; D
A list first; they won't go back to point B because that would be a choppy kind of thinking, kind of how I and SEE thinks and how this young lady expresses her opinions when she speaks; an LSE will go back to point B if asked to evaluate further otherwise what they have expressed in the first approach about point B is what they had to say about it.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She is not SEE, though. I won't lie that I briefly considered ESI or LIE, but still, get that shit away from me.
Type aside, I don't know of many who do talk like that. Thank God.
Yes she is; from the way and the order in which she expresses her sequence of thought, essentially in a choppy manner she is SEE.
You know, not all SEE are going to be attractive. There are LSE who just make me go, "what happened to you?" sometimes.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
This article, although long, explains how each type thinks and approaches an answer..
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...e_Styles(wiki)
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-09-2012 at 03:47 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The onus is on you to make your case so give us a brief on how you think it's applicable.
"Statics tend towards fragmentary-analytic thinking; Dynamics tend towards associative-synthetic thinking."
"...reducing explanations to deterministic mechanisms."
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Now explain the pertinence of this paste-job to the typing you've assigned this woman. I note as well that you've yet to confime her.
Okay, I'm going to go with ESE. One who has a very annoying manner of speaking.
I'm not feeling well, so I'm not really trying.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
But don't you think from this video that she just talks about what she sees observes?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViFkO...ayer_embedded#!
Compare that to ESE swagger wagon mom. She isn't so much about leaving an impression or some plan as she is about just about having "fun" and she's a merry type so she probably doesn't need to express all of this need to love and be loved in the seriousness of the tone that that girl takes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Jmy-...eature=related
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Alright then, I'll just have to risk reading your jumbled mind.
WOW, you've got me, now you get meI require interpretation.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
No shit.WOW, you've got me, now you get me
ESFJ
not famous although
this article is one of exotic fantasies and nothing more
i dont think shes so bad and i dont hear anything wrong with her voice.
what she says reminds me of something a professor i had said about ethical behavior, that a method that worked for her when she was faced with a dilemma was to imagine whatever choice she made in the newspaper headlines the next day. i could see that kind of thing being useful situationally.
My ex boss had a voice like hers, it kind of grated on me... she was a Te base.
I also think that this lady is serious quadra fi valuer, an ESE wouldn't like the idea of living transparently & not being able to act.
I'm not sure I get what you're saying.I'm an Fi valuer and I hate the idea of being unselectively transparent.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
