Type Me - Video

[diljs]

well

[JRiddy]

Okay, you've convinced me you are ILE, probably Ti-sub, with that video. Your temperament seems a lot more EP than IJ, but I didn't see it quite before. I guess it makes sense about your posts and deliberateness...I was really cautious about posting when I started.

Well, welcome to the club. Here's your stamp:

THUGZ FO LIFE

[Phaedrus]

Yes, you are not similar to David Byrne, diljs -- neither in look nor in behaviour. Your gesture pattern is much more similar to Daniel Negreanu's (the famous poker player whom you can see in lots of videos on Youtube). Negreanu is almost certainly an ILE too.

[diljs]

Yes, you are not similar to David Byrne, diljs -- neither in look nor in behaviour. Your gesture pattern is much more similar to Daniel Negreanu's (the famous poker player whom you can see in lots of videos on Youtube). Negreanu is almost certainly an ILE too.

I actually do gesture very similarly to david byrne when I'm in large social situations and nervous, but not normally.

This Negreanu character moves like I do when I'm in large social situations and comfortable. He also reminds me of Edward Norton.

[diljs]

If the question is just between the two types: ILE and LII, I'd definitely, positively go for ILE. If the question is outside of the choice, I'd go for T, static, Ne type. An alternative is ESE imo, though there is little to back it up imo.

Aren't ILE and LII the only two static Ne T types?

[Phaedrus]

I actually do gesture very similarly to david byrne when I'm in large social situations and nervous, but not normally.

Byrne has a different V.I. look.

This Negreanu character moves like I do when I'm in large social situations and comfortable. He also reminds me of Edward Norton.

That's a correct observation. I have typed Edward Norton as ENTp indepent of Rick's typing of him as ENTp. Ganin has Norton as INTp, but I think Ganin is wrong about that. Both Negreanu and Norton are most likely ENTps.

[Ezra]

You're certainly structured in your thinking: "first I'm going to talk about...", "then I'm going to talk about...", which would perhaps point towards Rationality. However, I'm unsure.

I think you're low on Fe, but whether or not you value it, I couldn't say.

And no offence, but the start made me cringe. It was like you were about to advertise something. It was horribly rehearsed.

[Ezra]

Ganin has Norton as INTp, but I think Ganin is wrong about that.

When is Ganin right about anything?

[diljs]

You're certainly structured in your thinking: "first I'm going to talk about...", "then I'm going to talk about...", which would perhaps point towards Rationality. However, I'm unsure.

I think you're low on Fe, but whether or not you value it, I couldn't say.

And no offence, but the start made me cringe. It was like you were about to advertise something. It was horribly rehearsed.

I was clearly advertising The Economist

[hellothere]

I agree with ILE > LII, because your temperament seems more EP than IJ... I wonder if what Ezra noticed has something to do with Fe hidden agenda

[Ezra]

I was clearly advertising The Economist

Hahahaha.

I agree with ILE > LII, because your temperament seems more EP than IJ... I wonder if what Ezra noticed has something to do with Fe hidden agenda

Point.

[Steve]

Yeah man Ti ENTp. I see the similarity with me too.

[diljs]

Yeah man Ti ENTp. I see the similarity with me too.

It's the yellow shirts

[Steve]

It's the yellow shirts

[Exodus]

You're certainly structured in your thinking: "first I'm going to talk about...", "then I'm going to talk about...", which would perhaps point towards Rationality. However, I'm unsure.

I just watched the video and I think this is a good point. LII > ILE. Also considering the other thread:

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=18966

It all reminds me a lot of myself.