Hey there—and let's cut to the chase.
I'm an LIE-Ni, and I joined this forum to find ILIs. The search is more specific than that, of course, but that's a start. And this introduction itself is perfunctory.
That said, I take my leave.
(Bows.)
Hey there—and let's cut to the chase.
I'm an LIE-Ni, and I joined this forum to find ILIs. The search is more specific than that, of course, but that's a start. And this introduction itself is perfunctory.
That said, I take my leave.
(Bows.)
I am not who you're looking for.
Nooo, you're okay. (Toasts with coffee.)
What will you do with them, once you find them?
...or maybe they are.
Welcome.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Here, destroy:
@Simo @Number 9 large @Skeptitron @Remiel @Invisible
"All nations will place their hope in him."
(Mt 12:21)
the problem is - a lot of mistyping
if you are not sure in your typing skills or have no enough data to type - leave Socionics or risk to get random people which you think as ILI
Just to better explain the situation. I'm here 9 years and only 1 girl typed to own dual. On other forum I re-typed from my duals 2 girls during 3 monthes, while I'm training to type for many years. To type someone with assurance you need video or IRL contact (preferably for several monthes). Also take into account when you like a human, you may type, at first, him to good IR with more probability than should. Good behavior, kindness, beauty, intelligence - anything may mix in your consciousness for the mistake. You need good skills, time, self-criticism to choose people by types. If you don't study the typology on serious level - think twice befor using it.
To check own type is also useful. ENFJ seems better for you. You may create typing theme:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1096450