What's up?

[shadowbox]

I'm a new forum member/long time(ish) socionics follower. After a good deal of agonizing, self-doubt, and online multiple-choice quizzes, I've narrowed my type to a Intp-te subtype with a 5w4 enneagram. I think I've explored the possibility that I might be a different type pretty thoroughly, but if anyone finds that something I've said is a "classic XXX"-type remark I'm definitely open to discussing/reconsidering it. Anyway, it's great to be here and to be a part of the process of exploring and enriching the theory of socionics.

[Persephone]

Welcome.
Looks like wall of text= verbal diarrhea though

[shadowbox]

Welcome.
Looks like wall of text= verbal diarrhea though

Thanks, good to be here. Also, not to quibble with you, but actually it takes at least 8 lines minimum for a paragraph to be considered a wall of text/verbal diarrhea. 4 lines is more like a tasteful privacy hedge of text

[Persephone]

Thanks, good to be here. Also, not to quibble with you, but actually it takes at least 8 lines minimum for a paragraph to be considered a wall of text/verbal diarrhea. 4 lines is more like a tasteful privacy hedge of text

Subjective point of view
4 for me ... 8 for you... may be 16 for someone else.
You can guibble with me.
And still welcome

[The Martrix]

I'm a new forum member/long time(ish) socionics follower. After a good deal of agonizing, self-doubt, and online multiple-choice quizzes, I've narrowed my type to a Intp-te subtype with a 5w4 enneagram. I think I've explored the possibility that I might be a different type pretty thoroughly, but if anyone finds that something I've said is a "classic XXX"-type remark I'm definitely open to discussing/reconsidering it. Anyway, it's great to be here and to be a part of the process of exploring and enriching the theory of socionics.

Welcome to the forum. We're always happy here to smash your hard-fought certainty before your eyes.

Thanks, good to be here. Also, not to quibble with you, but actually it takes at least 8 lines minimum for a paragraph to be considered a wall of text/verbal diarrhea. 4 lines is more like a tasteful privacy hedge of text

I don't see a wall of text.

[The Martrix]

Subjective point of view
4 for me ... 8 for you... may be 16 for someone else.
You can guibble with me.
And still welcome

That's 4 lines... you're pushing it!

[Persephone]

That's 4 lines... you're pushing it!

That was done on purpose!

[shadowbox]

Welcome to the forum. We're always happy here to smash your hard-fought certainty before your eyes.

Thanks, and I agree that smashing hard-fought certainty is a) fun to do to others and b) painful, but helpful, to experience on the receiving end.

That's 4 lines... you're pushing it!

lol, yep it's definitely a slippery slope

[The Martrix]

That was done on purpose!

I'll let you off ... just this once.

[The Martrix]

Thanks, and I agree that smashing hard-fought certainty is a) fun to do to others and b) painful, but helpful, to experience on the receiving end.

The thing with me is, I have a habit of smashing my certainty without any outside help.

lol, yep it's definitely a slippery slope

I hope you've brought adequate footwear. It's not going to get any less slippery.

[Persephone]

[trifling nincompoop]

Subjective point of view
4 for me ... 8 for you... may be 16 for someone else.
You can guibble with me.
And still welcome

everyone knows walls are 8 or higher anything less is more like a fence or some shit

[The Martrix]

everyone knows walls are 8 or higher anything less is more like a fence or some shit

Writing walls of text is indicative of Fe-PoLR. Nothing is more effective in making people go away.

[Persephone]

everyone knows walls are 8 or higher anything less is more like a fence or some shit

I would have written it like this:

"I'm a new forum member/long time(ish) socionics follower.

After a good deal of agonizing, self-doubt, and online multiple-choice quizzes, I've narrowed my type to a Intp-te subtype with a 5w4 enneagram.
I think I've explored the possibility that I might be a different type pretty thoroughly, but if anyone finds that something I've said is a "classic XXX"-type remark I'm definitely open to discussing/reconsidering it.

Anyway, it's great to be here and to be a part of the process of exploring and enriching the theory of socionics."

or


"I'm a new forum member/long time(ish) socionics follower.
After a good deal of agonizing, self-doubt, and online multiple-choice quizzes, I've narrowed my type to a Intp-te subtype with a 5w4 enneagram.
I think I've explored the possibility that I might be a different type pretty thoroughly, but if anyone finds that something I've said is a "classic XXX"-type remark I'm definitely open to discussing/reconsidering it.
Anyway, it's great to be here and to be a part of the process of exploring and enriching the theory of socionics."



Am I a freak?

[trifling nincompoop]

I would have written it like this:

"I'm a new forum member/long time(ish) socionics follower.

After a good deal of agonizing, self-doubt, and online multiple-choice quizzes, I've narrowed my type to a Intp-te subtype with a 5w4 enneagram.
I think I've explored the possibility that I might be a different type pretty thoroughly, but if anyone finds that something I've said is a "classic XXX"-type remark I'm definitely open to discussing/reconsidering it.

Anyway, it's great to be here and to be a part of the process of exploring and enriching the theory of socionics."

or


"I'm a new forum member/long time(ish) socionics follower.
After a good deal of agonizing, self-doubt, and online multiple-choice quizzes, I've narrowed my type to a Intp-te subtype with a 5w4 enneagram.
I think I've explored the possibility that I might be a different type pretty thoroughly, but if anyone finds that something I've said is a "classic XXX"-type remark I'm definitely open to discussing/reconsidering it.
Anyway, it's great to be here and to be a part of the process of exploring and enriching the theory of socionics."



Am I a freak?

dunno about freak but its definitely not efficient spacialy speaking lol

[The Martrix]

I would have written it like this:

"I'm a new forum member/long time(ish) socionics follower.

After a good deal of agonizing, self-doubt, and online multiple-choice quizzes, I've narrowed my type to a Intp-te subtype with a 5w4 enneagram.
I think I've explored the possibility that I might be a different type pretty thoroughly, but if anyone finds that something I've said is a "classic XXX"-type remark I'm definitely open to discussing/reconsidering it.

Anyway, it's great to be here and to be a part of the process of exploring and enriching the theory of socionics."

or


"I'm a new forum member/long time(ish) socionics follower.
After a good deal of agonizing, self-doubt, and online multiple-choice quizzes, I've narrowed my type to a Intp-te subtype with a 5w4 enneagram.
I think I've explored the possibility that I might be a different type pretty thoroughly, but if anyone finds that something I've said is a "classic XXX"-type remark I'm definitely open to discussing/reconsidering it.
Anyway, it's great to be here and to be a part of the process of exploring and enriching the theory of socionics."



Am I a freak?

No, you're eyes are just letting you down. I get confused by walls of text, but it's mostly when I'm reading my own minuscule handwriting,.