I teach you the lessons of Socionics

[Yaaroslav]

I am very far in their knowledge of Socionics. Working in socionics since 2003, having regular contact with top experts such as Socionists: Bukalov, Gulenko, Mironov, Talanov, Meged, Churyumov, conducting numerous experiments I have been able to achieve such results are not yet come none of socionist.

But keep in mind that my knowledge is organized on the principle of a brick house: without a foundation - you do not build walls, no walls you do not build the roof. By analogy with the brick house: Without knowledge of the material "A" - you do not know the material "B". Without knowledge of the material "B" - you do not know the material "C" and so on...

I am writing this message for you to know what awaits you in front of a lot of information which is in effect allow you to achieve this knowledge Socionics with its true effect, laws and benefits on people who do not know Socionics

Just watch carefully for my lessons: a thorough study of my articles - and not let fatigue hurts because I can tell you: THERE IS LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL!
Well, to finish my message, I want you all to say in unison

I'm proud to know about socionics!!!

[Timmy]

Yaaroslav, you should consider putting that socionics knowledge of yours to good use by contributing to the "What's my Type" section of the forum.

[Yaaroslav]

The results of our video conference would be uploaded soon. Now I have a huge queue of orders. But, perhaps, during the one month I'll do it

[GuavaDrunk]

You could build a tallish roof out of bricks then dig a small tunnel as entrance. Or make an igloo, which is practically the same thing.

[Bardia]

You claim to have a complete understanding of socionics that we don't possess on the forum (even though you wouldn't even be able to know that since you haven't talked to everyone and haven't been here long) yet you have no explained a single thing in any sensible way. Right now you have 0 credibility so I have no reason to believe you know anything at all.

[Absurd]

[Yaaroslav]

You claim to have a complete understanding of socionics that we don't possess on the forum (even though you wouldn't even be able to know that since you haven't talked to everyone and haven't been here long) yet you have no explained a single thing in any sensible way. Right now you have 0 credibility so I have no reason to believe you know anything at all.

But you must give a credit. Without any trust you will not understand anything

[EyeSeeCold]

But you must give a credit. Without any trust you will not understand anything

+1

You have to trust, for someone to be trustworthy. You have to respect, for someone to be respectable. It starts with you.


Acknowledge and Apply.

[Yaaroslav]

But you must give a credit. Without any trust you will not understand anything

+1

You have to trust, for someone to be trustworthy. You have to respect, for someone to be respectable. It starts with you.


Acknowledge and Apply.

What exactly do you suggest I do in my relations with others people?
If you just accept their version - in order to earn their trust - this will not work. Because it is the selling truth instead for a good relationships.
Selling the truth - is a damage for the development of the science.
Perhaps you post doesn't make a sense.
You told me: "+1"
I tell you: " - 1"

[NewBorn STAR]

+1

You have to trust, for someone to be trustworthy. You have to respect, for someone to be respectable. It starts with you.


Acknowledge and Apply.

What exactly do you suggest I do in my relations with others people?
If you just accept their version - in order to earn their trust - this will not work. Because it is the selling truth instead for a good relationships.
Selling the truth - is a damage for the development of the science.
Perhaps you post doesn't make a sense.
You told me: "+1"
I tell you: " - 1"

Imagining that you are not a troll.
Then i suppose that fanatism is a good way to cope with the uncertainty associated with our inner nature. Sign up when you dont need it any more

[Gilly]

This guy makes me think Socionics might be some kind of cult.

[NewBorn STAR]

This guy makes me think Socionics might be some kind of cult.

I thought it was a cult. All the knowledge you need is in jungs work. All this rest is just fanatical bullshit coined by the dumbshitwhore Augusta trying to sell a relationshipchart from the merits of her own broken marriage.

[Gilly]

lol did she really get a divorce?

That's fucking classy as hell.

[Gilly]

I thought it was a cult.

So you're here for the free punch or what

[rat1]

+1

You have to trust, for someone to be trustworthy. You have to respect, for someone to be respectable. It starts with you.


Acknowledge and Apply.

What exactly do you suggest I do in my relations with others people?

Contribute something worthwhile instead of making grandiose allusions that no one gives a shit about. Let your amazing work speak for itself.

[NewBorn STAR]

I thought it was a cult.

So you're here for the free punch or what

Yeah i dont say no to free buffets.

This is good place to observe religious fanatical behavior and sectarianism.

People here really mold themselves to these boxes to the max.

We already have a suicide bombers people like Maritsa and MD and other mooing cows of stupidity

[Cuddly McFluffles]

I thought it was a cult.

So you're here for the free punch or what

I was told we were getting kool-aid.

[Yaaroslav]

I thought it was a cult. All the knowledge you need is in jungs work. All this rest is just fanatical bullshit coined by the dumbshitwhore Augusta trying to sell a relationshipchart from the merits of her own broken marriage.

You considered me not as a troll, But I consider you as a troll. Just get a cool guy!

[Yaaroslav]

What exactly do you suggest I do in my relations with others people?

Contribute something worthwhile instead of making grandiose allusions that no one gives a shit about. Let your amazing work speak for itself.

Ok! I'll do more amazing jobs here. I try also to do it understandable for English speaking men. I will not mention on trolls...
Just watch me very attentively. If something is not understandable - propose me some variants. I'll be thankful to anyone who contribute into the socionic science!

[GuavaDrunk]

[Ave]

I am very far in their knowledge of Socionics. Working in socionics since 2003, having regular contact with top experts such as Socionists: Bukalov, Gulenko, Mironov, Talanov, Meged, Churyumov, conducting numerous experiments I have been able to achieve such results are not yet come none of socionist.

But keep in mind that my knowledge is organized on the principle of a brick house: without a foundation - you do not build walls, no walls you do not build the roof. By analogy with the brick house: Without knowledge of the material "A" - you do not know the material "B". Without knowledge of the material "B" - you do not know the material "C" and so on...

I am writing this message for you to know what awaits you in front of a lot of information which is in effect allow you to achieve this knowledge Socionics with its true effect, laws and benefits on people who do not know Socionics

Just watch carefully for my lessons: a thorough study of my articles - and not let fatigue hurts because I can tell you: THERE IS LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL!
Well, to finish my message, I want you all to say in unison

I'm proud to know about socionics!!!

You are arrogant.

[Beautiful sky]

He's just trying to find support for his theories/ideas/Ne. He's not being arrogant. His expressions and pushing them forward is an example of Se PoLR

You claim to have a complete understanding of socionics that we don't possess on the forum (even though you wouldn't even be able to know that since you haven't talked to everyone and haven't been here long) yet you have no explained a single thing in any sensible way. Right now you have 0 credibility so I have no reason to believe you know anything at all.

But you must give a credit. Without any trust you will not understand anything

You're asking for Fe Dual, but not everyone here is your dual. So just relax and don't put pressure on your PoLR; you're opening a lot of threads and going into hyper activity. I for one usually have a very difficult time understanding INTj types. It would help if you could slow your pace down. I trust you and I'm trying very hard to understand your ideas and theories (), but also your analysis are too much for me without linking them to typical human characteristics/traits and so they seem rather cold and undigestible to me, personally and I don't want you to take this as a judgement of an offense (although I can see how to someone who is an Fe valuer this may seem that way, but I'm trying to find ways to structure my speech so that I may come off in a way to Fe valuers that is not offensive.)

That was way too much rambling on my part, but I hope it helps you understand my type and where I'm coming from.

Take it easy please.

[Suz]

Yaaroslav's OP sounds a lot like Maritsa's "grand entrance" to the community.

I agree with Bardia.