Just a silly poll.
I use Google Chrome. It's the fastest and neatest, in my opinion.
Why do you suppose some browsers may be better suited for some types? Or do you suspect there is no correlation?
Alpha and Internet Explorer
Alpha and Firefox
Alpha and Chrome
Alpha and Safari
Alpha and Opera
Alpha and Mobile
Alpha and Other
Beta and Internet Explorer
Beta and Firefox
Beta and Chrome
Beta and Safari
Beta and Opera
Beta and Mobile
Beta and Other
Gamma and Internet Explorer
Gamma and Firefox
Gamma and Chrome
Gamma and Safari
Gamma and Opera
Gamma and Mobile
Gamma and Other
Delta and Internet Explorer
Delta and Firefox
Delta and Chrome
Delta and Safari
Delta and Opera
Delta and Mobile
Delta and Other
Just a silly poll.
I use Google Chrome. It's the fastest and neatest, in my opinion.
Why do you suppose some browsers may be better suited for some types? Or do you suspect there is no correlation?
Firefox, but out of convenience. I'm not fully content of it but it's currently the best option to me.
Opera all the way.
Chrome and Firefox. Chrome is noticeably faster than others for basic web browsing, but for some reason it doesn't like my webcam so I have to use Firefox for Tinychat :-(
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
chrome because i'm kind of owned by google and i'm just used to it.
i used to have safari and firefox installed too but got rid of them both at some point for some reason or another, and chrome came out the winner of the battle.
i still have explorer and use it for tinychat since going there in chrome makes my computer pass out.
dolphin on my phone. its the only phone browser i like, at all. ten times better than any of the others.
My ideal WB would be lightweight fitted only with no-nonsense features. Additionally, being portable, modular and requiring little dependencies. Adherence to sensible standards - and resilience to the nonsensical - is a big plus. Let alone open-source. FF is pretty common-sense, though it fancies from time to time with different hypes hypes and it's pretty bloated and unstructured.
From a technical standpoint I like NetSurf, but it is currently far from complete or stable. It does not yet support JavaScript so it's unusable on many so-called "modern" websites (to most of them JS is not even necessary). This browser has its quirks, for example the action of left-click text selection becomes page drag if you miss the text. The good part about NetSurf is that its developers seem reasonable, open and common-sense, you can discuss man-to-man with them, they do not live in an ivory tower of a business or inertial organized project. This aspect is very important to me BTW, I may think to quit using a product just because it's going the wrong way or it's in the wrong hands. It is important the principles, even if changing, to be respected without compromise, not alter them contextually when a new non-sessential deal comes up; in the end those events have nothing inherently to do with the product - consequently with me - but with their life I don't care about. Just don't start me on Google.
I use Chrome because of the way it renders the page is more pleasing to the eye.
Do you like the design of Opera? Is it faster? Does it have features the other browsers do not?
I was not speaking idealistically, but yes, that sounds like a good browser. I think "minimalist" is a good theme for a browser.
You are probably right, lol
I understand how you feel about Google.
I'm not officially voting, but I use safari.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Well if it happens some browsers don't exist, that doesn't make them bad browsers. Their inexistence is merely an accident, this state of things being just temporary. I can support this argument simply: all knowledge about the future is subjective, whether we talk about the existing or inexisting; the former may vanish and the latter may come into being. Relying on existing things is therefore an idealism, too, just that instead ideal objects, it relies on ideal successions. I thus assert, the two stances have equal rights when it comes to your two questions.
What an ass
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
i use chrome but i can't be arsed to learn about the pros and cons of browers because they are boring and shallow instruments to me. i don't remember any intelligent deliberation going into the decision to go with chrome.
Forefix
Firefox because I disdain all the data mining Google does with chrome
One thing is also established. Betas don't go on teh internetz.
Also what type is Bowser?
I'm just happy no one has clicked the Internet Explorer.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden