.,m.,m
you want to v.i. this person who i am having a horribly hard time v.i.-ing
.,m.,m
Last edited by implied; 03-08-2008 at 06:56 AM.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
he really just doesn't look like any type i've v.i.'ed before. i figured rational/logical. not sure what else.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
He's a cool-dude. Surely can't be LII then(j/k)
no, 'cause LIIs look like nerds!Originally Posted by Cyclops
He's a cool-dude. Surely can't be LII then
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I'll second that he looks like a cool rational fun guy to hang out with, but VI wise you're completely on your own on this one.
FUERA DE URUGUAY!!
"Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."
- Voltaire
WHY IS HE SO IMPOSSIBLE TO VI?
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Exactly. I'm not able to tell from the photo but does he have big feet? It might help
lkjl;kj
Last edited by implied; 03-08-2008 at 06:56 AM.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
His trousers are too long. So's her skirt aha. Sorry I'm not helping. If I can come up with something constructive after thinking some more I'll let ya know Looks like a fun night tho
My thoughts --
Probably strong Se and Si
I think more irrational than rational
He seems a bit -- "edgy". And I think Se>Si.
My first guess is SLE.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
i think Se quadra is more likely, from what little i know of this guy. i v.i.'ed him earlier as ISTj but something about that doesn't really make sense. then again, i suppose it could. i don't know, i'm just not "getting" something. maybe i don't know many ISTjs. i did see a mild henry rollins resemblance, fwiw.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Logical and extroverted. ILE or SLE, I think.
By rational.. I meant logical. Sorry, i forgot that terminology isn't interchangeable here.
"Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."
- Voltaire
Oddly, perhaps, the 7th picture makes me consider INFp.
He reminds me of Kelly/Khamelion's ex-boyfriend, and somewhat of myself.
He does have a somewhat IP-ish look in that one.
are you serious? could be a little like you. the only forum member he readily reminded me of was mysticsonic. hence rational/logical typing. yet another law student, fwiw. so there's one thing you have in common.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
@Implied
This is something that I was thinking earlier on..and it still doesn't help you coz you don't know what I look like. But some of the..I dunno.. Expressions remind me of how I look in some photos. Still doesn't help much!
ILE was my first thought.
SLE-Ti is my guess just from those pics. Seems like someone I'd get along with. Had a brief thought of INFp when I saw that 7th picture as well... he just seems a lot more extraverted percieving in the others though. Fi POLR definitely looks possible too.
Suomea
Lol. I was just going to say the only think I see is lack ofbut now I'm not going to say it.
Lol. I was just going to say the only think I see is lack of
I actually thought weak sensing at first as well. Some of his poses seem a little awkward (most noticeably in 3 and 5, I think).
The thing that reminded me of myself was the second picture. It's almost the exact expression I had in my blunt-smoking avatar
Entj, I Vi People EaSily By Now.
Last edited by Dioklecian; 02-16-2008 at 12:18 AM.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
GILLY, WHERE IS MY MONEY?I actually thought weak sensing at first as well. Some of his poses seem a little awkward (most noticeably in 3 and 5, I think).
The thing that reminded me of myself was the second picture. It's almost the exact expression I had in my blunt-smoking avatar
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
I was going to suggest LSE, but it appears I'm probably wrong.
Do you see my avatar?
I SEE THAT YOU OWE ME 1000$.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
I see Se and Fi; Se > Fi.
Definitely seems like a sensor. I would say either ISTj or ESFj.
are the two guys in the last pic the same guy or two different guys...? and which one is the guy we are VI:ing?
I considered all ST. Whoa, looks ESTp. But here he looks ESTj... Mhh... here he loos ESTp but more introverted, so maybe ISTj, Mhh, ISTp? No. But now back to the ESTj...
Overall I'd say he's either ESTp Ti subtype or ESTj. He's so difficult to VI because he's Se in one pic and Si in the next. j in one and p in the other. I'm guessing what he shows others is quite different from how he is when there's no one watching.
But he reminds me of someone. John Corbett (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0179173/ ), who is definitely ESTj. This would also explain the "initially typed as ISTj, but something was missing.".
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
i actually think the 7th picture looks ESTp. strong xSxp impression to me.
the other pics look ESTp but with some weird posturing thing going on.. since most of the pics have this .. unassuredness i have a few guesses: ESTj, ENTj, ESTp, ISTp.
yeah, hence why i thought ISTj. i don't get the irrational vibe really and he doesn't seem "loud" enough somehow to be an extrovert. Ti-ESTp might be a good compromise though.I considered all ST. Whoa, looks ESTp. But here he looks ESTj... Mhh... here he loos ESTp but more introverted, so maybe ISTj, Mhh, ISTp? No. But now back to the ESTj...
But he reminds me of someone. John Corbett (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0179173/ ), who is definitely ESTj. This would also explain the "initially typed as ISTj, but something was missing.".
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Have you given a full description of him yet?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
I was thinking about this. What I get from him is an underlying impression of, hmm, "cold and calculating even when also able to goof around and relax" which I think it's charactersitic of Ti-ESTps. I agree with Kristiina that he seems Se in one picture and Si in the next, which is why I thought he was strong in both.
Hah. I have collected more impressions and he kind of seems like a lazy hedonistic sluggard () who is kind of a detached observer and not too hardwired with what happens around him (introverted irrational). Calculating and independent. Just tends to *shrug* about everything. Not easily shaken. I go for ISTp.
no, and i'm afraid i really can't give a great description of him as i don't actually know him that well (odd, because i met him almost 10 years ago.) anyhow, he's a friend of one of my really good friends -- an MBTI INFJ who reminds me a lot of CuriousSoul. again, all i know is that apparently somewhere during those 10 years he went off and attended law school and spent some time in hong kong.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
And the results from the lab confirm this?
Last edited by Joy; 02-16-2008 at 02:43 PM.
I thought IEI first, but then quickly SLE. Using quadra, I'd say not alpha, not gamma, edging towards beta, rather than delta. Also, the other people in the pictures are mostly beta I think.
I think SLE. And I don't think I 'd like him. He looks mean. Well, he looks like Expat described him.
Last edited by Park; 02-16-2008 at 03:20 PM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Yeah that was exactly the feeling i got from him. I thought ISTj first, ESTp probablly works. Ive also seen ENTj's act serious in photos when they really aren't, though.
ENFp (Unsure of Subtype)
"And the day came when the risk it took to remain closed in a bud became more painful than the risk it took to blossom." - Anaïs Nin
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote