They were observations which need to be checked by rockclimber, not judgements. They were crudely put, and insulting, but still observations based on her appearance. Perhaps if I would have said, "She seems like a cunt because..," instead of, "she is a cunt," I would have won your moral support. Please consider my observations regardless of how I apply their makeup. And so what If i find what she offers in these photos disagreeable? Since when do I have to like everyone? I'm not going to burn her house down, and will never directly harm her by playfully mocking my perception of her.Originally Posted by thehotelambush
If I would have said, "She seems like a girl interested in status symbols. She wears expensive clothes. She seems of average intelligence. She seems like the kind of girl who gets by on her looks alone. etc," would I have made the cut? Anyhow, this girl will live. Hell, I may have to bite the bullet if she shows up(it's happened before!). And I will.
Funny story: Yesterday my friends and I were playing frisbee golf and a guy was playing through. He makes a poor shot and say, "Well that's pretty much the worst thing ever." I said, "yeah, it was much worse than the holocaust." He didn't laugh--I think he thinks that I was thinking that what I thought about and said was supposed to be something he was to think an insult. He didn't laugh. I bit the bullet, but you know, I was right. He was way offbase-- the nerve a that jerk!
Also, implied, there are SO MANY ESFPs out there that some of them must embody the traits I mentioned, ESPECIALLY with Se as a leading function. So unpack your bags-- this girl only seems to taint the sample.