Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: John Gottman

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NiFe
    Posts
    778
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default John Gottman

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E94xTxEydN4&mode=related&search=[/youtube]

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xw9SE315GtA&mode=related&search=[/youtube]

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOdre3Bra8o&mode=related&search=[/youtube]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gottman

    The studys' findings are interesting.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    852
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Any ideas anyone? His ideas may be useful particularly if the whole socionics duality thing is not working so well.
    Socionics: XNFx
    MBTI: INFJ

  3. #3
    Don't forget the the thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    6,612
    Mentioned
    156 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INFj. See the second video for an example of weak Ti. edit: I think ENFp is possible too.

  4. #4
    eunice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    TIM
    Ne-INFj
    Posts
    2,955
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush
    INFj. See the second video for an example of weak Ti. edit: I think ENFp is possible too.
    where's the weak Ti?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    694
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Unable to watch the video [no speakers] but from VI and information provided by the search engine, ENFp is my impression.
    IEI subtype

  6. #6
    Don't forget the the thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    6,612
    Mentioned
    156 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eunice
    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush
    INFj. See the second video for an example of weak Ti. edit: I think ENFp is possible too.
    where's the weak Ti?
    Thinking that it is possible to quantify things like that, especially to the extent where you can say anything about a 5:1 "ratio". Plus, (although he might have just been glossing over it to make it simpler for the audience) the "positive" things can only be called positive because they correlate with relationship success in the first place.

  7. #7
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eunice
    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush
    INFj. See the second video for an example of weak Ti. edit: I think ENFp is possible too.
    where's the weak Ti?
    All over the place Watch the second video: he completely fails to define what he means by "positive" and "negative" things, leaving room completely open for interpretation, and allowing for excessive inclusion of "possible" actions that might conceivably fall into one of these poorly-defined categories. Weak Ti, Ne, and Te preference.

  8. #8
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush
    Thinking that it is possible to quantify things like that, especially to the extent where you can say anything about a 5:1 "ratio". Plus, (although he might have just been glossing over it to make it simpler for the audience) the "positive" things can only be called positive because they correlate with relationship success in the first place.
    Great Alphas think alike...? :wink:

  9. #9
    Don't forget the the thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    6,612
    Mentioned
    156 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GillySaysGoodbye
    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush
    Thinking that it is possible to quantify things like that, especially to the extent where you can say anything about a 5:1 "ratio". Plus, (although he might have just been glossing over it to make it simpler for the audience) the "positive" things can only be called positive because they correlate with relationship success in the first place.
    Great Alphas think alike...? :wink:
    Damn straight.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •