Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Unusual ways to assess types

  1. #1
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Unusual ways to assess types

    Questionnaires are not yet a reliable thing. Percieving types would show lots of contradictory traits, and Judging types would show an high lie scale, because they tend to percieve reality as what it should be, rather than the raw reality itself. VI isn't reliable either, and observation assessing needs experience. I needed myself several months to be sure I was really a LII (honestly, I'm 92-94% sure of my type). Relative method (i.e. assessing types by first assessing intertype relationships) needs lots of experience and confidence for previous typing.

    There can be alternate forms of assessing, such as :

    - Colour test : preferences 1-8 would reflect functions 1-8.
    - Photo test : Filatova uses it to discriminate S-N, and E-I. Sensing means detail-oriented, and Intuitive means global-oriented. Extrotim means absolute describing of things, and Introtim means relative describing of things (i.e. by subjective feelings).
    - Shoot-em-up test : play any shoot-em-up video game. An Introtim will normally make less movements than an Extrotim.
    - Phone Number test : give someone a phone number (example : 10 25 20). An Extrotim will normally memorise it as "10 25 20", as an Introtim would rather memorise it as "10 (add 15) (substract 5)".

    There could be even others...

  2. #2
    Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Former USSR (global nomad)
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    2,050
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    As you can see, there are two opposing approaches to testing:

    One is to try to test directly the traits you are trying to identify, with possible strong self-perception biases. The other is to test something that is a consequence of the trait to catch the testee by surprise.

    I like the idea of the second one, but you have to be sure to test things that are extremely closely related to type.

  3. #3
    Creepy-bg

    Default

    rectal examination (I'll spare you the details )

  4. #4
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i hadn't heard of some described by machintruc.

    it may be nice to make a sticky topic about "ways of type recognition" ?

    there are lot's of ways. some definately better then others.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •