Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Gardner's Multiple Intelligences

  1. #1
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Gardner's Multiple Intelligences

    Gardner's model actually resembles more "differential psychology", like FFM and 16PF than "hard" type theories like Myers-Briggs and Enneagram.

    Gardner talked about "multiple intelligences", which seem to be correlated with socionic IM elements (not really sure) :

    Linguistic -
    Logical-mathematical -
    Spatial -
    Bodily-kinesthetic -
    Musical -
    Naturalistic -
    Interpersonal -
    Intrapersonal -

    Gardner doesn't really talk of types, but more on scales ; according to him, each individual has a "cognitive profile".

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think we had a thread on this a while back, but it might be floating around in the General Discussion part of the forum. Maybe I shoould go look up my results and see if there is any correlation.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: Gardner's Multiple Intelligences

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc
    Gardner's model actually resembles more "differential psychology", like FFM and 16PF than "hard" type theories like Myers-Briggs and Enneagram.

    Gardner talked about "multiple intelligences", which seem to be correlated with socionic IM elements (not really sure) :

    Linguistic -
    Logical-mathematical -
    Spatial -
    Bodily-kinesthetic -
    Musical -
    Naturalistic -
    Interpersonal -
    Intrapersonal -

    Gardner doesn't really talk of types, but more on scales ; according to him, each individual has a "cognitive profile".
    i don't agree with any of these correlations in the slightest except for bodily-kinesthetic. and maybe interpersonal.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    TIM
    TiNe
    Posts
    7,967
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ...I admire that he actually had the guts to question 'g'.

    Nontheless I will relish its oncoming abolition. ...That's something I'm kind of on the fence about though: the crosstype theory largely abolishes the work of hundreds of people on the nature of intellect as obsolete. All that will be left is the study of the information elements themselves, and how they manifest in the mind.

    ...But I would be somewhat foolish to let concerns over their subjective experiences get in the way of my logic, eh?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tcaudilllg
    ...I admire that he actually had the guts to question 'g'.

    Nontheless I will relish its oncoming abolition. ...That's something I'm kind of on the fence about though: the crosstype theory largely abolishes the work of hundreds of people on the nature of intellect as obsolete. All that will be left is the study of the information elements themselves, and how they manifest in the mind.
    did he really say this?

    wow, you really are insane. why did i have the brilliant idea of unignoring you for a post? do all your posts look like this?

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    TIM
    TiNe
    Posts
    7,967
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17
    Quote Originally Posted by tcaudilllg
    ...I admire that he actually had the guts to question 'g'.

    Nontheless I will relish its oncoming abolition. ...That's something I'm kind of on the fence about though: the crosstype theory largely abolishes the work of hundreds of people on the nature of intellect as obsolete. All that will be left is the study of the information elements themselves, and how they manifest in the mind.
    did he really say this?

    wow, you really are insane. why did i have the brilliant idea of unignoring you for a post? do all your posts look like this?
    Only if you're a base idiot. (and I think you are)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •