How accurate do you all think the collective Socionics community is at determining the types of the individuals we study? What factors contribute to our accuracy, and how accurate are we both individually and as a group?

Are our individual determinations clouded by a desire to follow leaders in the forum, agree with the reasoning of logical members, or some other undesirable influence? Are we more inclined as a group to attribute a certain temperament, quadra, or even type to any given individual?