View Poll Results: in your opinion, was O'Donnell right about Ripa's comment?

Voters
7. You may not vote on this poll
  • dunno

    2 28.57%
  • no

    5 71.43%
  • yes

    0 0%
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Ti vs Fe

  1. #1
    mustachio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    stoppage time
    Posts
    896
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Ti vs Fe

    some time ago, Kelly Ripa got bodyslammed by Rosie O'Donnell for what she might/might not have said to American Idol finalist Clay Aiken. if you don't remember (or simply don't know), Aiken was a guest host on Ripa's morning show replacing Regis Philbin. they were interviewing guest when Aiken put his hand on Ripa's face humourously yet impolitely attempting to stop her from interrupting his line of questioning. she was visibly upset and said that it was "a big no-no... i don't know where your hands have been".

    on her show The View, O'Donnell accused Ripa of homophobia. Clay Aiken had been forced out of the closet some time before and O'Donnell is a lesbian and vocal supporter of gay and lesbian rights.

    even though Ripa didn't say anything offensive in regards to homosexuals, one could see why O'Donnell took that stance. one can also see why it doesn't make any sense whatsoever. would you say that it's a case of Ti versus Fe?
    IEI - the nasty kind...

  2. #2
    Elro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    2,796
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Meh. From the way you described it, it sounds like they both overreacted. However, I'm more inclined to side with Ripa in this particular case, as I think O'Donnell is just reading too much into it (taking her words literally?). Unless I'm missing something, what happened was more like an invasion of personal space, not to mention cutting her off. And "I don't know where your hands have been" is just a cliche, as far as I know. If a straight guy had done it, she probably would have been equally annoyed, and might have said the same thing.

    I doubt it has anything to do with Socionics. Oh, no wait, it has to do with Se! Because Aiken is repressing Ripa's ability to speak, and Ripa retaliates. Yeah. That's the ticket.
    Quote Originally Posted by Logos
    Holy mud-wrestling bipolar donkeys, Batman!

    Retired from posting and drawing Social Security. E-mail or PM to contact.


    I pity your souls

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    M-H λ
    Posts
    2,609
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    o'donnell is x imo. i would say it is more a violation of

  4. #4
    Elro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    2,796
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by science as magic
    o'donnell is x imo. i would say it is more a violation of
    Ah yes, with the personal space and stuff. Yeah, I'd agree with that.
    Quote Originally Posted by Logos
    Holy mud-wrestling bipolar donkeys, Batman!

    Retired from posting and drawing Social Security. E-mail or PM to contact.


    I pity your souls

  5. #5
    mustachio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    stoppage time
    Posts
    896
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    okay sorry. i guess i oughta rephrase my original question. what do you think is the function related to putting words in another person's mouth? moreover, what function takes words in their most literal sense (taking into account only what has been said and not the underlying possiblities)? in your opinion, was O'Donnell's comments related more to Intuition or Feeling. or both?
    IEI - the nasty kind...

  6. #6
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mustachio
    okay sorry. i guess i oughta rephrase my original question. what do you think is the function related to putting words in another person's mouth? moreover, what function takes words in their most literal sense (taking into account only what has been said and not the underlying possiblities)? in your opinion, was O'Donnell's comments related more to Intuition or Feeling. or both?
    Sensing.

    Or rather, weak intuition.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  7. #7
    mustachio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    stoppage time
    Posts
    896
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yeah, weak Intuition does make some sense. i think O'Donnell might be a nasty emotionally unhealthy SLE.
    IEI - the nasty kind...

  8. #8
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LSE, if you ask me.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    M-H λ
    Posts
    2,609
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    like a masculine version of roger ebert

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •