Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Which Types are These?

  1. #1
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    916
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Which Types are These?

    Type 1: Whether they are in law, management, academia, to this type, other people are basically just cockroaches to step on. They will stoop to the most underhanded means necessary to get their way. Whether it's stabbing people in the back when they are not looking, or "getting even" when someone can't defend themselves. Then, when the tables are turned, their motto is "have mercy for me" in the most servile way - when they don't have mercy for anyone else...

    Type 2: Someone else is the most despicable, underhanded person possible, but to this type they are "deserving of mercy" because "they have problems" - regardless of their situation. OTOH, for the people that are victimized, nothing is said by this type, nothing is done, not even a single thought is put into helping anyone else, but the person victimizing others is always "innocent" and "in need of help."

    Type 3: I am loud, attention-grabbing person. Often sexually promiscuous. I have the same issues as type 1. I will stoop to any means necessary to stab someone in the back, but when the tables are turned I act like I'm innocent. If the finger is pointed at me, it's the same stuff that "I didn't do it" or "please have mercy for me!"

    Type 4: I am big-time beaureaucrat. My life is just filled with all of these rules-of-thumb. However, I don't have a drop of creativity and couldn't think outside-the-box if my life depended on it. I have the same problem as type 1, where I come down hard on people and could care less about it... (Think of the airport manager from the movie "The Terminal")

    These are four types I sometimes run into. I am just curious what their socionics types are...
    Last edited by jason_m; 02-06-2019 at 12:16 PM.

  2. #2
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,619
    Mentioned
    224 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1. Jerk
    2. Jerk
    3. Jerk
    4. Jerk
    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

  3. #3
    Metaphysician thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    7,777
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well...someone doesn't like Se

    Types 1 is some pastiche of Se valuing types. Your problem seems to be how they seek success at any cost, and treat themselves differently from others, which is opposed to NeSi(+Ti). There might be a bit of Fi in there too.

    Type 2 might be some Se valuer other than Se leading, such as Beta NF or ESI.

    Type 3 might be specifically Se leading or EIE.

    Type 4 - LSI probably.
    The higher, the fewer

    Articles - Questionnaire - Typology Network - Blog

  4. #4
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,619
    Mentioned
    224 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Well...someone doesn't like Se

    Types 1 is some pastiche of Se valuing types. Your problem seems to be how they seek success at any cost, and treat themselves differently from others, which is opposed to NeSi(+Ti). There might be a bit of Fi in there too.

    Type 2 might be some Se valuer other than Se leading, such as Beta NF or ESI.

    Type 3 might be specifically Se leading or EIE.

    Type 4 - LSI probably.
    I think you remain under an impression that Se = shithead. It doesn’t.
    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

  5. #5
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    4,599
    Mentioned
    616 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by golden View Post
    I think you remain under an impression that Se = shithead. It doesn’t.
    That would be Sh, not Se.

  6. #6
    Metaphysician thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    7,777
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by golden View Post
    I think you remain under an impression that Se = shithead. It doesn’t.
    No but the information provided is more specific than that. We already had this conversation.
    The higher, the fewer

    Articles - Questionnaire - Typology Network - Blog

  7. #7
    Danali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Lundun
    TIM
    xxE
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the first one is obviously some sort of Fi valuing type
    Depending on who you talk to,
    I'm either deceptively deep
    or deceptively shallow.

  8. #8
    a two horned unicorn renegade Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Playing with your head
    TIM
    Ne-ILE-C 7 LEFV
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    168 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    1. Your dad
    2. Your mom
    3. Your sister
    4. Your brother


    Seriously they sound unidimensionally developed individuals.
    Sol mb F type due to his inability to think alternatives.


  9. #9
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    10,418
    Mentioned
    829 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danali View Post
    the first one is obviously some sort of Fi valuing type

    I think the OP is posting their own judgments (Fi) of how they see these people. It is a subjective evaluation of people they dislike. Therefore they can't be typed based on a paragraph of OP's values judgments. I think it says more about the OP's preferences than anything.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     




  10. #10
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    916
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I think the OP is posting their own judgments (Fi) of how they see these people. It is a subjective evaluation of people they dislike. Therefore they can't be typed based on a paragraph of OP's values judgments. I think it says more about the OP's preferences than anything.
    Even as Se-PoLR, there are a whole bunch of Se-egos that I like: Jason Statham, ("World's Smartest Man") Christopher Langan, Dwayne Johnson, John Cena, basketball player "Birdman," football coach Mike Singletary, even Liam Neeson - "Taken" is one of my all-time favourite movies. And then the sexy, outspoken E7 Se types: Katy Perry, Madonna, Kate Winslet, Megan Fox, etc. I just simply cannot stand someone who is a complete a**hole. I therefore cannot stand: a lot of Robert De Niro's characters (e.g., "Taxi Driver", "Raging Bull"), Gordon Ramsay, 'Judge Judy,' 'Miss Daisy,' 'Anton Chighurr' from "No Country for Old Men" and 'Alonzo Harris' from "Training Day." And there are people who are not traditionally Se who I cannot stand. For instance, the personalities of Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman are very close to me and their philosophies could not be more sickening...

    Therefore: 1) with all of those examples I have given, I don't think it is simply about Se. 2) As an 'Alpha NT,' and therefore a logical, creative person, am I expected to watch "No Country for Old Men" and feel absolutely nothing? I mean, am I supposed to be a cold-blooded sociopath? That is almost what is expected...

    I also remember the when I studied the MBTI. It was always the "thinking types" that I minded - the ones associated with cruelty and abuse, but I couldn't explain why I liked a lot of the ENTPs and INTPs. "But aren't they thinking types just like those other abusive types?" It didn't compute.

    In fact, every one of the a**hole's mentioned - "thinking types" under the old rubric.

    And now the same thing with 'Se': "How are Jason Statham Anton Chighurr alike? I like Statham. I cannot stand "No Country for Old men." How are they both 'Se'?"

    Do you see what I'm getting at?

    Whatever the real nature of this function is, it just floats from one Jungian function to the next, without anyone being able to pinpoint what it really is...

    I can just see it in the next theory, it's just going to be the same thing again with a different function. And I will once again be 'Fi-PoLR' or 'Ti-PoLR' or whatever...
    Last edited by jason_m; 02-08-2019 at 10:54 AM.

  11. #11
    Metaphysician thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    7,777
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @jason_m you seem to have a similar confusion. You dislike a particular manifestation of Se - not Se in general. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
    The higher, the fewer

    Articles - Questionnaire - Typology Network - Blog

  12. #12
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    10,418
    Mentioned
    829 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    Even as Se-PoLR, there are a whole bunch of Se-egos that I like: Jason Statham, ("World's Smartest Man") Christopher Langan, Dwayne Johnson, John Cena, basketball player "Birdman," football coach Mike Singletary, even Liam Neeson - "Taken" is one of my all-time favourite movies. And then the sexy, outspoken E7 Se types: Katy Perry, Madonna, Kate Winslet, Megan Fox, etc. I just simply cannot stand someone who is a complete a**hole. I therefore cannot stand: a lot of Robert De Niro's characters (e.g., "Taxi Driver", "Raging Bull"), Gordon Ramsay, 'Judge Judy,' 'Miss Daisy,' 'Anton Chighurr' from "No Country for Old Men" and 'Alonzo Harris' from "Training Day." And there are people who are not traditionally Se who I cannot stand. For instance, the personalities of Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman are very close to me and their philosophies could not be more sickening...

    Therefore: 1) with all of those examples I have given, I don't think it is simply about Se. 2) As an 'Alpha NT,' and therefore a logical, creative person, am I expected to watch "No Country for Old Men" and feel absolutely nothing? I mean, am I supposed to be a cold-blooded sociopath? That is almost what is expected...

    I also remember the when I studied the MBTI. It was always the "thinking types" that I minded - the ones associated with cruelty and abuse, but I couldn't explain why I liked a lot of the ENTPs and INTPs. "But aren't they thinking types just like those other abusive types?" It didn't compute.

    In fact, every one of the a**hole's mentioned - "thinking types" under the old rubric.

    And now the same thing with 'Se': "How are Jason Statham Anton Chighurr alike? I like Statham. I cannot stand "No Country for Old men." How are they both 'Se'?"

    Do you see what I'm getting at?

    Whatever the real nature of this function is, it just floats from one Jungian function to the next, without anyone being able to pinpoint what it really is...

    I can just see it in the next theory, it's just going to be the same thing again with a different function. And I will once again be 'Fi-PoLR' or 'Ti-PoLR' or whatever...
    When I said it said more about you I was not attempting to type you anything specific. I was noting you have a particular worldview that does affect how you describe other people. If we asked the friends of those people it is very possible another "type" would be described. See what I mean? What you were expressing looked like Fi which all people use in some form. I have seen your posts over the years so this is not the first time I have noticed the way you have described others. I didn't say anything about you disliking Se, that was @thehotelambush.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     




  13. #13
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    916
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    @jason_m you seem to have a similar confusion. You dislike a particular manifestation of Se - not Se in general. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
    I find that this is the case for almost every type or function. For instance, almost everyone who has been typed ILE as a consensus I like, but there are still exceptions. Gammas I often don't like, but there are many exceptions. There are betas I like and betas I don't like. It seems like every function I either value/don't value simply has a manifestation that I value/don't value and that's it... I simply could not make the theory fit if it were not this way, so there are plenty of exceptions...

  14. #14
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    916
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    When I said it said more about you I was not attempting to type you anything specific. I was noting you have a particular worldview that does affect how you describe other people. If we asked the friends of those people it is very possible another "type" would be described. See what I mean? What you were expressing looked like Fi which all people use in some form. I have seen your posts over the years so this is not the first time I have noticed the way you have described others. I didn't say anything about you disliking Se, that was @thehotelambush.
    Okay. Nevermind.

  15. #15
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    10,418
    Mentioned
    829 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    Okay. Nevermind.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     




  16. #16
    Metaphysician thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    7,777
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    I find that this is the case for almost every type or function. For instance, almost everyone who has been typed ILE as a consensus I like, but there are still exceptions. Gammas I often don't like, but there are many exceptions. There are betas I like and betas I don't like. It seems like every function I either value/don't value simply has a manifestation that I value/don't value and that's it... I simply could not make the theory fit if it were not this way, so there are plenty of exceptions...
    Yeah, that's true about the whole theory. Human relationships are messy and involve other factors than socionics.
    The higher, the fewer

    Articles - Questionnaire - Typology Network - Blog

  17. #17
    aka Feathers, Penny Dreadful Babooshka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Behind your tonsils
    TIM
    479 so/sx
    Posts
    586
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Human relationships are messy and involve other factors than socionics.
    "If you ever get close to a human
    And human behavior
    Be ready, be ready to get confused
    And me and my hereafter
    There's definitely, definitely, definitely no logic
    To human behavior"

    4w3 7w6 9w1 so/sx

    "You see, there are still faint glimmers of civilization left in this barbaric slaughterhouse that was once known as humanity. Indeed that's what we provide in our own modest, humble, insignificant... oh, fuck it."

  18. #18
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    TIM
    LSI 6w5 sp
    Posts
    2,163
    Mentioned
    120 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    #Bigtimebeaureaucrat

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Colorado
    TIM
    IEI-Fe0
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    get this off the site

  20. #20
    a two horned unicorn renegade Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Playing with your head
    TIM
    Ne-ILE-C 7 LEFV
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    168 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Babooshka View Post
    "If you ever get close to a human
    And human behavior
    Be ready, be ready to get confused
    And me and my hereafter
    There's definitely, definitely, definitely no logic
    To human behavior"
    I think she implies that in order to describe process of being human is set of processes that makes things very jumbled up on top of that our bodies (maybe frequently) misfires signals while detectors that we also have are faulty and lacking in resolution in order to keep us functional [keeping energy consumption in check] enough in biological framework which also evolves quite slowly.
    Sol mb F type due to his inability to think alternatives.


  21. #21

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    9,205
    Mentioned
    824 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by golden View Post
    1. Jerk
    2. Jerk
    3. Jerk
    4. Jerk
    at least, someones should be not EIE
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  22. #22
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    916
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ruined View Post
    get this off the site
    Why? Should this be insulting to someone here?

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Colorado
    TIM
    IEI-Fe0
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    Why? Should this be insulting to someone here?
    it could be, but no i was just kidding

  24. #24
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    916
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ruined View Post
    it could be, but no i was just kidding
    Sorry, lol.

  25. #25
    The Neighborhood Witch Nocturne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    TIM
    EIE-Ni
    Posts
    111
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oof ouch, the bias coming through this post stingsssss.

    Are you a Delta?
    ~ || EIE || ~
    ~ || Taurus ☼ || Capricorn || Scorpio ↑ || ~
    ~ || Slytherin || ~


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •