EII-Ne seems possible
THE DANDY per astralsilkyonics
Cyndi Lauper
EII-Ne seems possible
THE DANDY per astralsilkyonics
Last edited by vesstheastralsilky; 12-02-2018 at 09:47 PM.
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
not delta
My LSE father just loves her. One of his friends he's travelled far and often to see VI's like her and this EIIish friend is always complaining about SLE Trump daily on social media ...
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
To watch some actor or alike is not IRL friendship. IR have lesser influence. Also type of your father mb other than you think.Originally Posted by vesstheastralsilky
Trump is EIE. And mb disliked for politics, not because of IR.
Cyndi Lauper - ESTP - Zhukov
Sol we type differently. I don't wish to argue. I have been typing for 18 years. That must be worth something. It is in my personal life at least. But thanks for sharing your views.
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
Seems way more Alpha than Delta here, but for what it's worth she does look a lot like a Delta NF girl I know.
You should to have <50% of real typing match with any other, not only with me. It's general situation due to known experiments.
The above woman is not EII definetely. Too weird, aggressive and rough.
> I don't wish to argue.
You have nothing significant to change my opinion. Speculations would not do it, while it's what arguing about types mostly is now.
> I have been typing for 18 years.
I'm not a novice too.
> That must be worth something.
If there would be objective prove about the quality of your skills, but not how long you use them, - that would be interesting.
> It is in my personal life at least.
To discuss the types of people near you is not against the rules of this forum. Also when you've written them - you've started the discussion yourself and hence it's not appropriate to say this to me.
You may mistake in types of those people and most probably do this, taking into account how bad your typing skills should be from the point of others, including mine (due to general situation mentioned above).
Also I doubt you identify correctly even own type. What I saw not a single time, including among those who "have been typing for X years". Besides may use doubtful theories as Reinin's bs what should reduce your correct typing.
I suspect Se type in you. I'd say LSI, but your suprising ethical manipulations to protect the opinion in logical region leave a chance for F types.
> But thanks for sharing your views.
We discussed the types and typology, - for what this forum is made.
If you think I was rude - I only said the evident truth. Which you need to understand to do not repeat the nonsense above. What somehow you have missed after possible years on typology forums.
I always assume her to be Alpha, seems to value both Fe and Ne.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
I agree with you, golden; based on the video clip she valuesand
...I was nearly tempted to say ESE, but Ej temperament doesn't really fit her.
-base is doesn't fit her behaviour.
Trump belongs to the beta quadra... but I guess there is an seperate typing thread especially for him.
Sol does this to many people, calling me noob and the like even though i have several years experience with socionics. I'd say don't worry about it.
On this person you are trying to type, Cindy, i can only go by VI and say that she seems Si/Ne and that EII is not unlikely. If indeed EII though i'd guess she must be really really NE since she seems really out there in a way. Why is she interesting to type? If there's something interesting about her to you I wouldn't mind doing a bit of research and could let you know if EII seems possible,
Yes, I say my opinion about types to many people. Like do other ones here and for what this forum exists. It's the main what was discussed there. But not what you've said. I'm sure that you do this - lie - to many people.
> calling me noob
Another your lie as I did not said this above.
While you and other ones without good experience are noobs objectively.
Also the most here, including you, never read normal Socionics sources and Jung but only a mess from English sites to get the same mess in your heads. Widely use heretic nonsense like Reinin's bs and subtypes. One of reasons you do not understand correctly own type.
Besides there exists objective situation of low typing matches between anyone what was the 2nd important part of my message. But not only with me, like you've described my point above. It's your 3rd lie just in several 1st words of your message.
The same like you lie to other ones, you do it to yourself. Being emotionally motivated. You do not seek for the truth, you more seek for emotions in a moment and distort the reality in your head to get the more pleasant ones. That's why when you get logical disagreement with your opinion - instead of thinking, you react by negative emotions and stubborn thinking indifference.
When you see how I argue with others logically about types - you switch off you head again and only want to inspire negative emotions to me in others, even by the cost of the evident lie.
In your case I'm sure your type is not like in the profile, while in vesstheastralsilky's I doubt still. She behaves on the forum not like those who I typed as SEI, including you as it's the main version for you.
For EII you are inadequately rude and unreasonable. It's how Te types perceive Fe types.
The reasons why you assign yourself Fi type mb emotional also. Possibly you've typed someone you liked as base Te and it's pleasant for you to fantasy yourself as Fi type. If you'd did the wide checking of IR effects with other people IRL near you'd had the chance to understand your correct type sooner. Many contradictions with IR theory would lead you to the truth.
> On this person you are trying to type, Cindy, i can only go by VI and say that she seems Si/Ne and that EII is not unlikely.
More possibly is that you "go by" the wish to agree with the opinion to get better emotions to yourself and such to influence better on the emotions of your opponent. As emotions and intrigues are more important for you than the truth. This conformism may be partly unconscious.
The SLE version is among possible. She is closer to extraverts. And is awfuly rude in manners to assume EII. What is not hard to notice on my EII examples, for the comparision.
Last edited by Sol; 12-03-2018 at 04:15 PM.
I always thought IEI but SLE is certainly possible.
Hard to say. I never thought SLE but it can be possible, yes.
Sometime I thought ESE, but not sure
Not IEI at all.
EII-Ne would be a strange typing but why not, even if I'm not really sure. It stay possible
I had the impression that this community unanimously decided on SEI for Lauper's type over ten years ago...
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
SEI why not.
I'm a bit at loss with cindy lauper.
SLE sound a little phony but possible, I still see SLE being a little more "aggressive"
Yeah, I think Alpha SF. SEI-Fe works. ESE 7 also works.
Yes, SEI.
That is one strong New York accent she has there.
she's Se valued
Flamboyance is not always Se. Party image is not always Alpha.
She is not one of my kindred spirits as SEI.
My EII-Ne typing still stands, based on wayyy to much data and logic to waste time explaining. Reading source material is not enough for advanced level in accuracy of typings. I've made my own studies and has insights. I encourage others to read the resulting archetypes and functional definitions threads I posted in general as well as the eastern Hexagram correspondences. The more cross sections of data and logic and perspectives one utilizes, the more accurate the typing can be. It is like science. Rash decisions based on trivia leads to massive error and mistypings catch on too much like wildfire just because one seems confident or claims to be a T.
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
@Delilah I enjoy your typing contributions and am thankful for your empathic and caring presence here. You are at times like a soothing balm. Thank you for being you.
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
Gee, leave her, and whatever sociotype she might be, alone.
She just wants to have fun.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I've had that song stuck in my head since I saw this thread!
I was surprised no one made this terrible joke before me. But have no fear, Feathers is here.I've had that song stuck in my head since I saw this thread!
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I'll just leave this here, maybe others will take the bait and they can suffer with me
Ohhhh no post true colors or she bop, heh
All through the night was a good one too
Iko iko - limh
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
IEE
No way is she SLE. C'mon people.
VI's more like a rational imo. I was reading about her activism - seems like an interesting person.
You are ascribing me motivations that simply aren't there.
I hardly ever respond to you because I can see by a mile that it is going to go nowhere.
However, since you have taken the liberty to type me so many times, I will do the same: there so many contradictions in your post i can't even begin to straighten it out. I'm thinking now you could be a Ti polr type. You are very quick to make hasty ethical judgements too.
Further, you are very belligerent, i've seen you persistently go after several members here. You don't shy away from conflict and you initiate it in fact - even when others ask you to drop it.
I also don't get the impression you are a calm person at all.
I'm settling on SEE for your type.
Do not address me again. Leave me alone. I have no wish to talk to you.
Last edited by Delilah; 12-04-2018 at 06:25 AM.
Your demand is against the forum's task, peoples' use and the forum's rules.
Do not lie, do not say incorrect, not optimum, not reasonable, do not act amorally or show other inferior behavior and there will no be basis to criticize your behavior.
At now you mislead people about your type, for example. Did unmotivated personal insults. Above you have written lie about me. Then you have gotten the justiful opposing and now whine that does not like the criticizm of what you did.
If you do not like when your opinions about types are disagreed here - do not use this forum, as it's done for types discussions.
If you do not like the critique of your other behavior - then behave adequately.
Also it's you, who started this discussion about you here. Relate your demand to yourself to do not provoke the returns.
I have put you on ignore as suggested by the mods. But i do have a right to respond. Regarding the bolded, you certainly don't get to dictate my behaviour here. Are you for real? Go mind your business somewhere else.
You need to leave her alone.
Yes, discussion forums are for discussions and it's fine to discuss, but if someone asks you not to address them again you need to respect that, especially since you have been berating Delilah needlesly about her type for some months now. Do you think anything will come out of it?
Also, do not put this on her. You have brought this upon yourself by needlessly berating her about her type which goes beyond merely "giving an opinion".
@Uncle Ave
Here was the similar situation in the past with @aster. I discussed the types. She did not liked and that leaded to demand about stoping to communicate with her, about her type, types of people she discussed on this forum, etc nonsense or to be baned. I've prefered the truth about types and interests of people who will use them and has rejected to do not discuss with her or talk with her or stop to think about types and other nonsense for this forum made for types discussions.
Delilah and alike want the censorship about types here. So they'd could to lie you without return critique. When they get the logical criticism against their bs - they insult you, get insults in return and whine about that, or just whine that do not want to know your opinion and demand mods baned you. If the wishes of delilahs will be seted above the normal talking about types here - the forum will become closer to a useless trash for mindless floods, for what delilahs are here mostly. And delilahs with the lack of truth will be also hurted by the reality against the true knowledge about which they demand to protect them.
If you want to care about people. Protect the truth, but nothing else here.
I do not do personal harassment 1st and almost never do it even in return. I'm here for types discussions. While delilahs here are more for other and this is the problem.
nonsense or to be baned
Socionics has changed. She could be anything now.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
It's very much like real life: each generation reinvents the wheel, but every time in a different way...
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
But myyyyyy version of Socionics is beeeest!
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
there is one correct type and hence one Socionics by Jung and Augustinavichiute
and versions of heresies
[until something is objectively proved to be included]
check "objective reality"
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
