Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 102 of 102

Thread: See what Big 5 traits you are visually attracted to!

  1. #81
    Bildung, baby coeruleum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    614
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xaiviay View Post
    That's interesting. Yes, the high conscientiousness has the most noticeably different bone structure compared to others. I actually don't like it, I think his jaw is too large and his browbone is too prominent. But you liked that one better than the others. We have different impressions

    There's subtle differences (well, at least to me, and to some other responders on this thread). But not everyone sees faces in the same degree of detail. Some people even can't tell any faces apart (imagine what living with that must be like ) and there's a sliding scale between those cases and strong facial recognition. Faces actually have such tiny differences that human brains are wired to be extra-sensitive to faces, particularly. Otherwise we wouldn't be able to tell each other apart.

    But anyways, we may not see the images in the same detail.
    I meant on the female and male ones. People with better bones just look better to me than fleshy squishy people in terms of my idealized version of what a person should look like. I can't even imagine being sexually or romantically attracted to a composite image even if that's what people are usually trying (and sometimes failing) to go for. If it's an actual person there are too many factors besides just face structure determining how someone looks and "your face structure looks like a composite for Big 5 Conscientiousness, baby!" is not a pickup line used by anyone ever.
    “Don't think money does everything or you are going to end up doing everything for money.” ― Voltaire

  2. #82
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,830
    Mentioned
    227 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @coeruleum You don't see a difference in their eyes and expressions? Only the face structure? That's interesting if true.

    I see a lot of differences between the pictures, they look like different people I've known throughout my life. Idk, I moved a ton as a kid, on average once a year to a new place with new people so maybe I just developed the quickly-sizing-people up by the way they look skill because it's something I had to use so much. Doing the same with composite pictures doesn't seem that different.

  3. #83
    Bildung, baby coeruleum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    614
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    @coeruleum You don't see a difference in their eyes and expressions? Only the face structure? That's interesting if true.

    I see a lot of differences between the pictures, they look like different people I've known throughout my life. Idk, I moved a ton as a kid, on average once a year to a new place with new people so maybe I just developed the quickly-sizing-people up by the way they look skill because it's something I had to use so much. Doing the same with composite pictures doesn't seem that different.
    I see different expressions but having a different expression doesn't make you a different person. The low emotional stability, low openness, and high agreeableness ones look physically ill to me based on their expressions and I think that's super unattractive. I don't think the composites quite look like real people though because they're too blurry. The High Agreeableness and Low Agreeableness males and High Conscientiousness and Low Conscientiousness females look the most different to me and the rest are distinguishable but still too annoyingly similar for my poor brain.
    “Don't think money does everything or you are going to end up doing everything for money.” ― Voltaire

  4. #84
    Xaiviay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    TIM
    SEI-Fe1 9w1 sx/sp
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coeruleum View Post
    I see different expressions but having a different expression doesn't make you a different person. The low emotional stability, low openness, and high agreeableness ones look physically ill to me based on their expressions and I think that's super unattractive. I don't think the composites quite look like real people though because they're too blurry. The High Agreeableness and Low Agreeableness males and High Conscientiousness and Low Conscientiousness females look the most different to me and the rest are distinguishable but still too annoyingly similar for my poor brain.
    No one is saying that facial features are the only factors in what makes a person attractive, if that's what you're disagreeing with. 'Having a different expression doesn't make you a different person' actually yeah, it seems to indicate that you are different person. Appearances don't just exist in a vaccuum. There's plenty of science out there finding that people are suprisingly accurate on their character judgements, just from looking at physical appearances. VI on this website is living proof that there's similar facial expressions between similar types of people. The paper in the OP is another example.

  5. #85
    Bildung, baby coeruleum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    614
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xaiviay View Post
    No one is saying that facial features are the only factors in what makes a person attractive, if that's what you're disagreeing with. 'Having a different expression doesn't make you a different person' actually yeah, it seems to indicate that you are different person. Appearances don't just exist in a vaccuum. There's plenty of science out there finding that people are suprisingly accurate on their character judgements, just from looking at physical appearances. VI on this website is living proof that there's similar facial expressions between similar types of people. The paper in the OP is another example.
    People tend to have more than one facial expression though. I feel like a lot of these could be the same person at different times. Others, clearly not (like the High vs. Low Agreeableness males.)
    “Don't think money does everything or you are going to end up doing everything for money.” ― Voltaire

  6. #86
    Xaiviay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    TIM
    SEI-Fe1 9w1 sx/sp
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coeruleum View Post
    People tend to have more than one facial expression though. I feel like a lot of these could be the same person at different times. Others, clearly not (like the High vs. Low Agreeableness males.)
    It's possible. Imo there's a baseline facial expression that tends to represent a person's character pretty well. That baseline expression will change according to different situations and emotions, but even the way they react to those situations tends to fit with that character baseline.

    The high openness eyes are one example of a facial trait I tend to see people either having consistently, or not having.

    Also each of those composites were groups of people that had one particular trait especially low or high. Real-life people would probably show signs of all 5 traits (either high or low) - except the ones they're neutral on.

  7. #87
    the Lycanthrope Remiel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Terra Incognita
    TIM
    Ni-ILI 468 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,645
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Baseline... yes.
    "The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools." ―Thucydides



  8. #88
    Darn Socks Director Abbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    7,000
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    bottom cuter, top more attractive
    both meh, bottom slightly better
    top looks slightly happier, only difference
    top less attractive
    prefer bottom

    So I like high agreeableness, slightly below-average conscientiousness, ambiverted, below-average emotional stability, and low openness.

    LSE
    1-6-2 so/sx
    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  9. #89
    Olimpia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    7,828
    Mentioned
    675 Post(s)
    Tagged
    8 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is cool


    For the guys...

    I liked: High Emotional Stability, High Extroversion, High Agreeableness
    I disliked: Low Agreeableness, Low Extroversion, Low Emotional Stability

    Overall confirms what I am into, though in real life I tend to also be into high openness.
    But I am guessing that the men with high openness in this composition were mostly "intellectuals", which is not my general preference.


    For the women...

    I liked: High Openness
    I disliked: Low Agreeableness

    Pretty much true.
    New Youtube [x]
    Facebook Page [x]
    Typing [x] Theory [x] Tumblr [x]



  10. #90
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,177
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BandD View Post
    The most immoral/destructive and fucked up dudes were the hottest to me. Figures.
    Fucking A. Same here. Low everything except extroversion. That was the high one. I'm doomed.

  11. #91
    AndyW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    London, UK
    TIM
    EII-1Ne(H) 5w4 sx/sp
    Posts
    49
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Went in blind with the first set of images.

    With the female portraits, I had a definite preference for high agreeableness and high openness and perhaps a slight preference for low emotional stability and low conscientiousness. Extroversion I could take or leave. But my attraction to Delta NF girls is not news to me, lol.

    More interesting to me was my opinion of the male portraits, I preferred low agreeableness and openness, and higher extroversion, conscientiousness and emotional stability. Maybe I feel more comfortable around my identical or mirror types when it comes to guys?

  12. #92

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    MI
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    10,459
    Mentioned
    257 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Fucking A. Same here. Low everything except extroversion. That was the high one. I'm doomed.
    Hmm yeah. I don't think that I really want some immoral, destructive person- it's just I am so turned off by self-righteousness and pious virtue signaling that by comparison it is the more attractive option.

    I clash with a group of people I call 'Heterosexual Angels.' I guess they're like you know, the Delta newsreporter people you see on tv or something? Or any very morally strict cop/judge type person I suppose.

  13. #93

    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    190
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For females:

    I strongly prefer High Openness over every other quality.

    I prefer High Agreeableness over Low Agreeableness.
    I slightly prefer Low Conscientiousness over High Conscientiousness.
    I slightly prefer Low Extraversion over High Extraversion.
    I don't have any preference regarding Emotional Stability scale.

    For males:

    I strongly prefer High Agreeableness over every other quality.

    I slightly prefer Low Conscientiousness over High Conscientiousness.
    I slightly prefer High Extraversion over Low Extraversion.
    I slightly prefer Low Emotional Stability over High Emotional Stability (I kinda surprised myself, wasn't expecting this)
    I don't have any preference regarding Openness scale.

  14. #94
    summerprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    US
    TIM
    IEI 4w3 sx/sp
    Posts
    552
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was most attracted to High extraversion, low conscientiousness, and both high and low emotional stability. I was definitely most strongly attracted to the high extraversion one

  15. #95
    Metaphysician thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    7,876
    Mentioned
    270 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinnieW View Post
    I did the test and it was quite difficult for me to dicide.
    My favorites ranked: "High Agreeableness" followed by "High Openness" and "High Conscientiousness".
    Similar to me.

    Primarily for the women:

    I liked high agreeableness, low emotional stability, high openness. (all of which sound like ESE traits)

    Both extremes of conscientiousness were unattractive to me.

    Extraversion - either is fine.
    The higher, the fewer

    Articles - Questionnaire - Typology Network - Blog

  16. #96
    Cybernetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    TIM
    SLI-Si
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For the women I liked high everything, for the men it was High Agreeableness, Low Conscientiousness, Low Extraversion, High Emotional Stability, and Low Openness. High agreeableness stood out to me in the males.

  17. #97
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    1,560
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I liked the low emotional stability guy the best LOL.

    Followed by high agreeableness.

    They look IEI and SLE to me, respectively.

  18. #98
    atlascog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    TIM
    IEI-2Ni 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I found High Agreeableness, Low Extraversion, Low Emotional Stability (!) and High Openness to be the most attractive in women. Very interesting, I suppose it aligns well with what I had previously thought.

  19. #99
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    TIM
    EII 4w5 Sx/So
    Posts
    311
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think I very much prefer high agreeableness on both of those sets.

    No wonder I have been attracted to 9s...

  20. #100

    Default

    Among the pictures of the women I was most attracted to high agreeableness and high extroversion. What I find remarkable is how similar the group of faces in each figure is to each other, even as I understand that these faces are composites.

  21. #101
    Alomoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    TIM
    LII INTj
    Posts
    430
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Those are just pictures of the same person with a slightly different expression. Garbage. I have litterally caught myself with a different expression in a similar manner.

    In other words, I'm a superficial autist who cannot differentiate between them. They're all equally ugly.

    To be fair though, when I took a test to decide if I could tell the emotions a person was feeling from their picture, I got litterally the same results as if I guessed. This was after multiple tries.

    WAIT. If I look at it from far away (or in my case, without enlarging the photo), I can see it. I can see the colors. Quality. Loophole!

    High openess. I like myself, apparently. Second pick is low extraversion.

    Also, I know someone who looks like high concientious. Probably the case. She would also qualify for high neuroticism, although I'm probably the worst person to be around for someone who is incredibly conscientious. I scored a fat 0.

    Lastly, high agreeableness seems to match the myth that people with non-parallel faces are better comedians. Hrrm.
    Last edited by Alomoes; 02-16-2019 at 09:08 PM.
    If I stop responding or posting, I've probably taken a break from posting stuff. This really taxes me for whatever reason. Said break could last anywhere from a month to a year. I will likely be back, as socionics is one of my interests. If I'm not on here, you can contact me on steam.

    I got a new computer, so I'll not type on mobile as much any more.

  22. #102
    Psychic/Ghost Type
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I looked at the men, since I'm attracted to males, and determined that the most attractive Big Five type to me is whatever you call:

    High Agreeableness
    Low Conscientiousness
    High Extraversion
    High Emotional Stability
    Low Openness

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •