Are there observable neurosis formation amongst types besides in Conflict and Supervision relationships?
Are there observable neurosis formation amongst types besides in Conflict and Supervision relationships?
One can speculate that even duality gives rise to neurosis because the partners compensate each other instead of developing superid functions.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Superego.
Activity (Super ID) in some cases.
Contrary.
Last edited by Hope; 05-23-2018 at 02:10 PM.
I find specially the second sentence for contrary highly amusing/disturbing/anecdotal.
I think asymmetry in general such as benefit might introduce something similar.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
yeah it makes it sound that if you find somene's eyes beautiful it might be extinguishment (at a higher rate than normal), beware of eyes!
the higher risk may be in close relations with types having in their ego your superego functions
this relates to some "neutral" IR too
I actually think that @niffer has beautiful feet.
(I saw her wearing those.)
*I don't have anything with feet, btw.*
LMAO @Crystal so weird
but ty!! My feet are US size 10/11 so that’s a nice compliment.
LOL such a weird context too w/ this thread
I think you’re hawt too btw
[Today 07:57 AM] Raver: Life is a ride that lasts very long, but still a ride. It is a dream that we have yet to awaken from.
It's hard to find a love through every shade of grey.
thank you, lol. I mentioned it because of the posts of Troll and Bert.
Ooh ok.
”When a third person joins the conversation, and one of the partners indirectly gains advantage through his or her attention or support, the fragile balance immediately disappears. If two people of extinguishment types have to live or work together, conflict is inevitable.”
This pretty much matches up with my experiences with SLIs, especially the first sentence. IME living and working together is fine as long as the two people are only having to deal with each other in a bubble, but in most cases that’s just impossible after a while.
SLIs I find are really sincere lol so it’s easy to make friends with them quick. Usually in groups I’ve been in the person who can easily get along with anyone is an SLI, and for me since I can’t really get along with anyone that’s a perfect match . Well it’s a stretch but anyway they’re easier to get close to than average for me but the relationship doesn’t exactly deepen or get intense. It’s always just mellow but that might have to do with SLIs being mellow themselves.
SLE x SLI = gay wrestling in comfy socks
[Today 07:57 AM] Raver: Life is a ride that lasts very long, but still a ride. It is a dream that we have yet to awaken from.
It's hard to find a love through every shade of grey.
there is definitely a thing going on with eyes.. gulenko says our extinguisher is our unconscious ideal and superego the conscious means whereby we strive to move closer to it, so in the extinguisher we see an aspect that we greatly admire, but because its consciously realized in them and not a byproduct of valued functions it leads to clashes in real interactions. its easy to mix up that ideal with the dual which maybe looks drab at first glance in comparison. in some sense everyone should beware of eyes, but at the same time I do think there is a form of genuine and alluring and not misleading eye contact. its the problem of misleading ITR in general via some aspect of appearance, it requires a kind of discernment that is nuanced. i just didn't like the idea that it was suggesting perhaps all forms of allure on that level were misleading, although I know it didn't say that. I probably overreacted. it troubles me to think I could sincerely feel a connection on that level and be wrong
Last edited by Bertrand; 05-27-2018 at 02:43 AM.