I always felt Viktor was wrong when he started delineating acumen with type, plus the idea that SEEs lack logic or abstract thinking. BTW John Linneman is ESE, with his interest in languages and analysis doesn't fit with the idea of the type which was clearly written by none representatives.
https://www.eurogamer.net/authors/1117
I've gotten rid of the "S/N" dichotomy, replacing it with "Direct-perception vs Interpretive-perception", direct "S" percievers take information as it is, whilst interpretive "N" percievers distort details through interpreting. On logic everyone is logical but:
*Pedantic "T" logicians are as the name says, obsessed with details in their reasoning, justification.
*Conceptual "F" logicians are focused on the general ideas in their reasoning and justification.
It's not surprising to see that most of the basic banal stuff attributed to other types is actually shared.