Congratulations, you've just managed to spot Ne PoLR of Ni HA. In terms of Ne broadness lacking. (Maybe also low Ti/Te if you meant that too, from your LII pov.)Originally Posted by BFGDoomer
Congratulations, you've just managed to spot Ne PoLR of Ni HA. In terms of Ne broadness lacking. (Maybe also low Ti/Te if you meant that too, from your LII pov.)
I forgot to reply to this earlier. Yah, I think some of this stuff you can learn with direct practice (about talking). Lol I didn't necessarily mean professional help in terms of a psychologist though.
95285568-352-k622253.jpg
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
That's one bad bear.
I was told that. Didn't mean you meant this. : P
IEI/ILI
because one F type girl have asked for this
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ssaged-Me-This
> - type? self-claims, or your guesses?
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...gs-Spreadsheet
Good question... maybe ILI bc even though IEIs can be trolly rude he seemed to go beyond that.
the other day you said something about considering if people were right, I think it could be dialectic thinking where one admits the other person's position inasmuch as there is a real contradiction and tries to unify them rather than simply deny one side or the other. this entails letting some of what they said "in" in some capacity or other. I think that may be what you're seeing. its doing the admission on a level that normally doesn't occur, where people take sides and never really seek some kind of third way, so its not a straightforward capitulation, it takes what they have already admitted to be true, in some sense at least in the sense that its sufficient for them to believe it, and tries to spin that into something new that resolves in some way the basic disagreement
@Adam Strange OUR LOVE is meant to be!
I am honestly flattered you see BOTH D subtype AAAND 3D Se, crack. Just wow, really.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
more definitive trait of IEI compared to ILI is to be dumb, but not rude
dumber
Sorry, but you can't expect me to take this "understanding" of people seriously.
Maybe you should get off the forums and go get a life and get actual experience with real life people instead of sinking deeper in bullshit like this. Socionics doesn't do much beyond a point, it's an incredibly general model, where you can't make such strong statements about type vs intelligence.
I can see why an IEI would look "dumber" than ILI, as they are more idealistic and positive with a dash of romantisme.
When one is more on the heavy, negative side, those trait really look like stupidity. It's a matter of perception, not intellgence, and that tells more about Sol than IEI.
@crAck, what does she say about sexual 8's?
https://i.imgur.com/3mOhO76.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/JS8LJf3.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/gqyjlSG.jpg
Adam is sp 6
Number 9 large is sx 6
Im SEI 9
No you can’t value Fi or Fe + be 9 and be rude
On big 5 test you got 0% agreeableness
I have to agree, NAWTEASE.
Zero agreeableness and E-9 core type don't match. People with E-9 core type are the most agreeable people.
At least one test result is wrong.
F types are such compared to T types. From the common view which describes the logical thinking. Especially weak T is noticable for base T types.
> It's a matter of perception, not intellgence, and that tells more about Sol than IEI.
It's the matter of truth, your bad types understanding or not being honest enough to say even the evident, while prefering the demagogy following to your moment emotional preferences and personal sympathies.
The situation tells that your mind is very speculative, your moral is doubtful and you are rather touchy. Also you have the inclination to personal intriguing.
The argument to assume higher possibility of your F type - EIE, most probably. Among Fe types the impressions from your look and your behavior does not fit to other Fe. Among Fi types - the most chance for ESI. Some emotional reduction can be due to your depressive state, but not T type only, photos give limited data to be sure in the degree of the emotionality, while your self-perception and decriptions mb wrong easily. Also possible introversion may reduce your external expressions.
Though you can be T type which is so nervous about critique in F region that rejects own reasonable thinking (and much of own personality in general) to redundantly behave softer where it's not appropriate. As this forum is made for the truth, but not for brainless pleasant flood to which you have shown the inclination.
With this attitude rejecting the thinking you are doubtful to use the types for your good as with such speculative and emotional approach you'll prefer your delusions before the truth more than average. So if you do not want to harm yourself and others by alogical misleadings, you'd better to be lesser emotional in types discussions or deal with lesser emotionally "touchy" theories than Jung's types.
With your video it would be more clear F or T type you are. At least, Ni type fits still to your behavior.
Last edited by Sol; 08-20-2018 at 01:39 PM.
Not in bad mood.
Sorry, I forgot to mentionNot in bad mood.
E-9 type that score low in neuroticism are most agreeable.
Better statement, now?
Answer in Bob Dylan style: "Poke, poke, pokin' on IEI's PoLR..."
No, as I was about mood and personal relation but not about personal trait.
E-9 show stubborn negativism in the mentioned conditions. Even if in those state they'll say by words the other - in their behavior they may change nothing.
They are easy people only on the surface.
No. I see this as one of her _possible_ types. Unlike some other types.
That might be your experience and perception. Your statement is too general to my perception; it dependence on circumstances and is situational.
She types everyone IEI m8
I love how ppl say flattered when called a sensor but rlly u know theyre always offended
@Avebury mb F type as thinks rather simply
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1291806
Lol.
Btw, @Sol does this mean you withdraw your typing of me as ILI?
Oh, well please give example of your thinking complexly. Lest you mb an F type.
There's just too much complex thinking embedded in this typing. Careful you don't injure yourself with your own intellect.
I did not typed you as ILI. I only have noticed this as the possibility without high assurance. Your mind reminds Ni alike, but not LIE. ILI is the closest to LIE among possible.
Now I get more doubts in T type and have said this. Your thinking is not serious from T types perception.
Your relation to money is rather childish and you value this alot - Se in superid. More chance it's your suggestive. So you mb IEI or EIE. You look softer than EIE, so IEI becomes the main version. Without the assurance still.
Read my messages and use some more of "thinking complexly" than common for F types to notice it.
Ok.
Why is my thinking not serious from the perception of logical types? Because of one post which wasn't meant to be serious anyways? And which logical types are saying this? I'll let you figure that last one out.Now I get more doubts in T type and have said this. Your thinking is not serious from T types perception.
You can tell, based on one post?Your relation to money is rather childish
I agree, here.and you value this alot - Se in superid.
Ok.More chance it's your suggestive. So you mb IEI or EIE.
You've seen photos of me?You look softer than EIE,
Alright, I want to argue with you, but you see, it's difficult because you consider Reinin and subtypes to be "heretical" and I don't. My arguments would refer to these things. For example, I can see ILI for myself, but not IEI or EIE. Those are aristorcatic types, and I am clearly democratic. But this is pointless to argue, as you'll just call me a heretic...so IEI becomes the main version. Without the assurance still.
Last edited by WVBRY; 08-30-2018 at 08:59 PM.
I don't really self-type. I was probably joking when I said LSI if I said it. When I did self-type, it used to be LII. Recently ILI is seeming like a better fit. TBH, I don't buy into socionics too much anymore, but I'm always curious to see people type me. I like the attention.
Model X Will Save Us!
*randomwarelinkremoved
yeah you seem Se quadra...
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
The age old question.
@aster you seem ESI based on this alone. http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1292671 You have strong feelings and judge people by your feelings of how comfortable they make you, or not, not physical comfort, but their attitude. And you are confident in this, skeptical that people you dislike can change or be made into better people. EII would be the opposite "they can change if you help them grow".
@hag I get the exact same attitude towards people changing from you. http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1292716
I know you guys aeren't asking for my opinion, but goodness, you guys'spolr and
dom is so glaringly obvious I don't know why you have any doubt, lol. I guess I could see another gamma type for Hag, since the attitudes you express are more general to gamma (for example, believing that bad people usually won't change) but Aster is confident in her own assesment of people's attitudes. I hate doing this (calling people out on their type) but goodness... is it obvious to me lol.
What do you guys think?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
:" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"