I saw her typed as ENFP in mbti and I think she's IEE (she's like lol), anyway, thoughts on her type?
Alicia Silverstone
I saw her typed as ENFP in mbti and I think she's IEE (she's like lol), anyway, thoughts on her type?
Lots of Delta themes (especially in the last video), pragmatic/flexible approach to diet.
Describes herself as shy.
Would consider other Delta types but IEE could work.
edit: it does seem like Si/Te is what she is most confident in talking about, in the last video and this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTrdSKRRTVc
She does seem to have some Fe so maybe LSE would be better.
Last edited by Exodus; 02-21-2018 at 05:15 AM.
Alicia Silverstone - ISFJ - Dreiser
I agree that LSE could work
I don't see IEE
There are signs of creative Si.
100% DOMINANT subtype
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Yes, she is most likely D-LSE
EDIT: This is a constant problem. All really attractive women are D-LSE. I've run into them many times. I want to be Delta.
EDIT II: For comparison check out Finnish politician Anni Sinnemäki, whom I type D-IEE. Very different feeling about her than Silverstone.
Last edited by Tallmo; 02-21-2018 at 10:35 AM.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Yeah, every Delta element except Fi appears very noticeably, so most likely Fi suggestive with Ne mobilizing.
Also worth noting that when younger she apparently related better to her pet dogs than to people (at least that would be strange for an IEE).
Also, her expectation that she would be strict with her children's diet.
edit: also, she has a blog: http://thekindlife.com if there was any doubt that she is Si ego.
Last edited by Exodus; 02-21-2018 at 12:27 PM.
I would agree IEE from VI alone. Plenty of Ne on the face as well Fi.
Established methods. So... LSE.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
IMO, she strikes me as Fi-IEE from overall behavior and mannerisms.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
I'd type Silverstone as IEE and Sinnemaki as LSE. lolOriginally Posted by Tallmo
I've problems seeing Silverstone career and roles as something that an LSE would chose.
She's LSE
Unless you are an IEE don't bother getting into a relationship with an LSE.
Can you be more specific? She did play some ditzy roles (from what I can tell, I've only ever seen her in Batman) but those are just characters. She mentioned that her character in Clueless is not like her actual personality.
She was in Blast From the Past as well.
She seems a bit much for me and also more ethical than LSE.
SEI
Good advice.
I've been in relationships with two LSE. I know very well what supervision is. I blame the mistake on their looks. LSE can be very attractive.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
But you find LSE in lots of different careers. So how do you decide that? She is a celebrity, so she is probably pretty smart and able to do many things.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
No, its not about the career, but about the roles she has chosen and limited to play. They are almost entirely ethical roles which would be strange if she´s Te Si ego.
Laura Prepon is an LSE imo, but she looks different from Silverstone and her roles are different (and her energy is very different):
This other girl is LSE:
I see those two examples very different from Silverstone and not just in her roles but all her way of speaking, communication, energy etc.
Last edited by Hope; 02-23-2018 at 04:47 PM.
I dunno, daniel day lewis is supposedly LSI and he does it all... I think at some point its just work, although DDL does seem to play more logical characters than ethical ones...
yes Laura Prepon gives a stronger Te impression. But subtype matters also.
What about ESE for Silverstone? That's the only other type I can see so far.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
This girl is probably ESE-Fe.
what was dating a LSE like as SEI?
It was fantastic attraction combined with inner fragility. Difficult to be myself, nothing feels natural. You start to fake it.
I've never been able to put it exactly into words but something like being very uncomfortable in my own skin and not knowing why, and desperately trying to forget it so I can be natural.
But it was a long time ago
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
moar
Not very similar to ESEs I know. But
Anyway here another one (probably Si subtype):
Last edited by Hope; 02-23-2018 at 09:22 PM.
To me Silverstone is an obvious ethical and Si valuer. Then I'd go with Te>Ti valuer. But SEI-Fe,ESE are more possible than LSE imo.
What about ESI as khcs suggested?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
IEE-Fi
LizziesAnswers is most definitely ESE.
(Also, IIRC the "ISTP" she describes here is most likely an LSI.)
Last edited by Exodus; 02-24-2018 at 01:09 AM.
just saw a girl today who looked a lot like her. she was chatting up her friend and clearly much more extraverted than the other girl. IEE sounds good, maybe Ne subtype.
ESIs are not Si valuers, Silverstone clearly is.
It's hard to see IEE from photos, perhaps i'll return to the thread to watch a video.
She isn't IEE.
LSE and IEE can appear very similar at first, especially leading subtypes because they use their mobilizing functions quite a bit. But pay attention to her in last video, Q&A video, in the 1st post.
Her reasons for being vegan are mostly logic. And when answering the college food question she digs deep into sensation to give examples and even comes up with a logical system (pot lucks) to lower food costs for the group.
Some of this might be wrong, but, could someone explain to me why she's IEE apart from 'vibes'?
She seems like a Sensing type somehow, so i'm not sure yet. I did some checking on her wiki page:
They (her husband) live in an eco-friendly Los Angeles house, complete with solar panels and an organic vegetable garden.[74] Silverstone bought the house, shared with a "menagerie of rescued dogs", in 1996.
2009, Silverstone released The Kind Diet, a guide to vegan nutrition, and launched its associated website The Kind Life. The Kind Diet has topped the Hardcover Advice & Misc. category of the New York Times bestseller list.[78] In 2014, her follow-up book The Kind Mama was published.[79] She plans to write a third, The Kind Diet Cookbook.[80]
In May 2011, Silverstone gave birth to a boy.[81] In March 2012, she received media attention for uploading a video of herself feeding chewed food to her son from her own mouth.
Silverstone has set up a sanctuary for rescued pets in Los Angeles.
Silverstone is noted for being an animal rights and environmental activist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alicia_Silverstone
^ Some data.
I'm looking for something which showsShe could maybe be ESI? I've seen ESIs who kinda look like her, are vegetarians, like dogs etc.
She's very social/environmental activist orientated, so, it implies F interests, but, Delta?
I suppose her interests are more small scale rather than wide ranging - not so much a change to society, but just wanting people to be vegan for some reason and looking after pets, might indicate SF > NF. It could also indicate I too, but EII does not seem likely based on her groundedness.
IEE is not impossible.
Edit: She describes herself as 'quiet and soft spoken' in the first video. IEEs can be this way in some cases, they're not loud and brash usually, but, introvert is more likely to be this.
2nd video: Instead of answering the question (at the start), she instead started talking about what she wanted to talk about, continuing to lecture people who don't want to stop eating meat (let people make their own choices, weak Ne?). I'm still seeing ESI (forceful form of moralizing.)
But, i'd like her to be IEE, cause that would be cool.
Just some thoughts.
Last edited by at sirac son of sirac; 02-24-2018 at 08:49 AM.
My first impression of her was ESE, but she can be Gamma SF. So ESI and SEE are possible. I also think she's more of a sensing type.
She seems more gamma to me. And her Fi/Te valuing is clear I guess.
SEE
Gamma gives off a lot more serious vibe than Delta and she comes off as aloaf not serious.
Anyways it's obvious to me she is LSE but that's because I attract LSE women like moths to a flame and it's common for them to give off a more IEE-like vibe because of gender norms.
This is a really good post, thank you. ESE can work too, thank you for noticing,
Maybe ESE > ESI or ESI > ESE, personally i'm just happy to say ESX and probs just leave it at that
Thanks again for your
Edit: Still seeing ESI though, ha
Last edited by at sirac son of sirac; 02-24-2018 at 10:04 AM.
Hm she seems an ethical type to me. Gamma SF may seem cold and serious due to Fi+Se. I haven't met an LSE before so I don't really know how to spot them but I still don't think she's LSE or a logical type at least. She fits the image I have for Gamma SF. She doesn't seem Fi suggestive but has strong Fi imo.
Me too I think ESI is more likely.This is a really good post, thank you. ESE can work too, thank you for noticing,
Maybe ESE > ESI or ESI > ESE, personally i'm just happy to say ESX and probs just leave it at that
Thanks again for your
Edit: Still seeing ESI though, ha
Yes but supervision is supervision
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I think you are confusing the Ne lighthearted demeanor, which the LSE will often emit because of mobilizing Ne, with Fi.
Fi is about a rigorous understanding of morality.
ex. EII
Last edited by domr; 02-24-2018 at 09:59 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote