Required to login
Required to login
Hmm. Are we both the same type?Originally Posted by ApeironStella
My result was 7-9-2 sp/so.
I also scored very high at both 5 and 7.
I can't confirm that. I can only confirm that that website runs a few JavaScripts to function properly.
Maybe a problem with your PC? Or some network problem?
You don't see the "Start the Test" button in the website?
Did you try the first link or use the one in the blog? I tried the ones she posted but the links need to be fixed. The one I posted is the direct link to the test. I guess it did require an email at the end so I used the one I set up for these kinds of things.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
She sent me this by e-mail and I haven't done it because I can never answer questions like that xD
Have a class with her on Tuesday and I think we'll be discussing e1, which is my type, so that will be...interesting, to say the least <_<
I cannot access on mobile :/
@Without Warning time to face truth mate
Truth been told!
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
I got someone I know to take the test that I typed as a 7w6 so/sx. She got 7 so/sx and scored much higher on 6 than 8, so 6 wing was confirmed as well.
Tri-type is not what I expected, but that could be a combination of tri-type being harder to type and the test's limited accuracy in determining tri-type.
Nonetheless, it has proven its accuracy to me in determining main core enneatype and wing in conjunction with instinctual stacking for those that are new to the enneagram.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Regardless if I'm a 5 or 7 core E-type, I guess I have a phobic 6 wing, that would explain my problems with anxiety in my youth.
Yeah I think the instinct part of the test might need some revising as most people in love can relate to it and also NFs might have a harder time relating to the sp as first. The sx first should apply across the board and not just in romance is what I got from material that has been around longer. I found another instinct test. I will post it.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Both of us having same tritype sounds possible to me, in all honesty! I can see either 5 or 7 for you, though we didn't talk that much? But from what I recall, you had some problems deciding between ILE and LII too, before settling on LII-Ne? So that fits in my eyes, I think that all three would add a degree of "softness" to how the LII appears? There is more of flexibility ("Ne subtype" if you will) to how they hold their ideas and in general how they act, though when it comes down to core principles, it is still something they hold tight to and doesn't as easily gets shaken? (Ie. Many times I found myself realizing that my idea on something was changing regardless of if I was uncertain about that change or not, but it would take time for that shift to fully happen than just a really fast momentary change? When left to my devices, of course.)
And 9-5 dilemma was my biggest trouble for a long time too, so yeah.
Noot sure if so/sp or sp/so for me yet, though leaning more of sp/so side for now. But still.
We are kind of like type cousins in any case
I just want to say that the team behind this are aware of issues surrounding it and that not everybody likes it, including that some people just don't respond to the format. These complaints have been brought to their attention by participants are should be addressed. I can say this because it came up in a class for the online course they are doing.
Socionics type twins but different gender...We are kind of like type cousins in any case
My interest in many fields of knowledge might show my strong valuing of
My preference foris the reason for I can't do anything I don't understand or make any sense to me.
And yes, I don't stick to some own principles for a long time.
My conclusion for my own typing was; Strong valued
ILE doesn't fit my because I valuemore than
, and I value
more than a ILE type normaly does.
LII Inert type does not fit me because I valueand
more than a non-subtype LII;
I can even act like a ESE type for a limited time if I want to.
Last edited by WinnieW; 02-11-2018 at 11:10 PM.
Chances are we are actually AU counterparts to each other and it is going to be a rom-com except there will be no romance and mostly talking about personality theories and bad jokes over the chat when we are not avoiding interaction with other human species or particularly with each other because not currently feeling like getting pumped up about that topic atmMBTI type twins but different gender...
My interest in many fields of knowledge might show my strong valuing of
My preference for
And yes, I don't stick to some own principles for a long time.
My conclusion for my own typing was; Strong valued
ILE doesn't fit my because I value
LII Inert type does not fit me because I value
I can even act like a ESE type for a limited time if I want to.
And honestly agree with that. It is all fun to play around with different things and learning about them but also even in madness, there gotta be some core principle/sense to it, regardless of how sensible it sounds to others. Just give me something consistent and I will wanna play around with that, poke it from all the sides and flip it around to see what that's made of.
And hmm... I kinda do and don't, tbh. There are very few really core things that what I think is a decent human being (Ethics judgment alert!) and other than those my view on things aren't as certain/fixed and keeps changing with new info to tie into/compare and contrast.
"
And also, I get valuing
I tend to joke about coming off as IxEs when I'm tired as in one of my tired modes I am a lot more interactive and tend to joke and make weird expressions just for kicks more, while my (somewhat) well rested mind ends up thinking whatever caught my attention at time, almost completely unaware of the time/place/setting/people.
I can see all three types in the tritype leading to more
6-3-9 / The Mediator
This is one test I most definitely answered honestly, and after doubting my current enneagram for a while, this result is probably closer to my actual tritype. Thanks a lot for the link! It's one of the best enneagram tests I've seen so far.
Screen Shot 2018-02-15 at 19.35.10.pngScreen Shot 2018-02-15 at 19.35.24.png
My 2 and my 4 were actually equal (0.28) and I type as 152, so this was pretty accurate.
(turns out I HAD to take the test as part of the class...it was hard)
She says this is the updated version of the test, and it keeps getting updated. Don't know what differences there are though.
http://app.trueself.io/home/(enneagr...me=enneagramv2
You can put that in the OP if you like. She has also said that she plans to keep it free indefinitely, unless something changes.
testies.PNG
Fun test. 594 sounds right.
I've already tried the paid version so I'll see if the free version differs all that much...
Paid: 549 sp/sx
Free: 945 so/sp
Probably has to do with feeling 5 the more unhealthy I am... and recently feeling better. I feel 9 normally but 5 has elements of extreme introversion and dissociation so it's kinda difficult not to be a 5 as an unhealthy introvert. And as always instinctual variants make zero sense to me, I'm literally all of them, none of them, some of them.... I don't know, I need consistency here but no definitions give me that, as with all typology really.
Most Likely Personality Type
The Rescuer
Most Likely Tritype
8-6-2
Most Likely Starring Roles
Protector, Alpha Leader, Champion, Maverick, Commander, Negotiator, Boss
Most Likely Enneagram Type
8
Most Likely Instinctual Stack
Intimate, Social, Self-Preserving
Most Likely Dominant Instinct
Intimate
[Today 07:57 AM] Raver: Life is a ride that lasts very long, but still a ride. It is a dream that we have yet to awaken from.
It's hard to find a love through every shade of grey.
Most Likely Personality Type: The Visionary
Most Likely Tritype: 1-4-7
Most Likely Starring Roles: Quality Control Specialist, Reformer, Perfectionist, Judge, Administrator, Rule Keeper, Crusader
Most Likely Enneagram Type: 1
Most Likely Instinctual Stack: Intimate, Self-Preserving, Social
Most Likely Dominant Instinct: Intimate
Interesting... I got 4-7-1 The Visionary.
Leading type: 4
Instinct: Social
I scored really high on e 7 as well, but that doesn't surprise me. Sometimes I think that I might be just a really unhealthy 7.
6-4-1.
I think it was sp/sx but it didn’t display properly for me either.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
I got 4 as my core type because I was answering according to what I have been most often for most of my life. I don't feel like I really relate to 4 so much anymore, though, and I believe it is possible to change your Enneagram type throughout your life. So idk, I'm not 100% positive, but I'm still leaning towards 9 as my core type. Here's my results:
Tritype.PNG
It gave me 5-4-8 sx/sp/so
Edit: 4 and 5 were tied, I'm guessing it just gave me 5 by default.
Last edited by WVBRY; 08-20-2018 at 08:37 PM.
I got the same results. 4-9-6 Sx/Sp (though graph below shows Sp/Sx, somehow). Another test I took elsewhere a while back gave me 4w5 So/Sp. I knew I was confused about the instinctual variables, but boy oh boy...
I know, it gave me graphs that didn't match the results that were labeled, too. It must be a problem with the site.
Yeah sounds like it.
rooofl this whole site is lifted directly from the enneagram.net main test.
My responses to these questions are probably completely biased by own current understanding of the system, so I'm not convinced this is really worth its weight. None of these questions or descriptions seemed particularly poignant. The cards are bizarre and none of them are particularly relatable.
Screen Shot 2018-09-05 at 10.44.15 PM (2).png
I'm having a hard time reconciling the description of type 4 Sx (assertive, agressive, emotionally open, etc.) with the description of 4-9-6 (passive, self-doubting, slow to react, etc.).
Her basic stance on that is that the instinctual subtype descriptions are "generally" true but are often biased towards particular tritypes.
In other words, she thinks Sx 496 exists, but the Sx 4 descriptions need to be improved to reflect that. It would still be a somewhat assertive and aggressive 496, but not as much or as obvious as one would expect, although the Sx 496 might be able to see it in themselves even if acknowledging that it isn't obvious to others.
Thank you for that information.
It's pretty easy to get lost when you think about types as disparate single-word adjectives, especially when dealing with a typology subset whose whole aim is to blend together entirely different types under the same umbrella term.
I find it much easier to think of tritype as an understanding that everybody has struggles with each of their respective "Centers." Just because someone is a head type doesn't inherently mean that their gut or heart faculties are completely normal; rather, that these fixations are simply focused on less, and the desire to nurse them carries less importance than the primary fixation. These lesser fixations will end up influencing a certain tertiary nuance or flavor to how the overall ennea-fixations operate, but won't define the type with broad strokes.
This site gives a particularly interesting framework to how types from different centers relate to each other via neatly symmetrical triads. For example, a 496 doesn't have any shared triad between the three types, but the two tertiary types both fall under the Attachment triad. So, in theory, you'll end up with a 4 who has all the primary 4ish fixations of its type but be flavored with some sort of external totem-seeking behavior typical to Attachment types. Etc and so forth for each of the 81 (?) type combinations.
This is very true.You obsessively think about your partner and their passionate pursuits. Most of all, you secretly worry about being found to be lacking or seen as ordinary or commonplace. You have a passion to be creative and original and long to be seen as a one of a kind. You are highly creative, original and emotionally honest, believing that everyone has the right to be who they are. You crave attention, especially from your mate. You see your mate and intimates as reflections of your individuality. You thrive on intensity and feel entitled to fully express yourself.
Last edited by VenusRose; 01-13-2019 at 04:51 AM.
9-6-4 sp/so
tritype-ins.png
tritype 549. 8>1 something has changed!
Enneagram 1
1-6-2
sx/so
I included both agreeable and contrary in my adjectives.
So now I've had every stacking tried on me except for sx/sp.
Does this mean I'm 1w9 not 1w2?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
