Same with Ti being equally subjective.Originally Posted by Number 9 large
I'm amazed people are typing me as Ti lead considering my disdain for subjective opinions. It's my biggest problem with socionics. Create some good fucking tests and some objective measures and you've got a decent little theory here. But not, "You look like so-and-so" that's garbage. That is no better than being Gemini in your Second House nonsense.
Fi valuing people typically have an issue with whoever has Fi values that don't match theirs.
You can see two Fi ego people hating each other just because their values don't align...
He associates most Fi with modern feminist/SJW people who don't share his values etc.
Also, ironically he judged Fi on the basis of it not being "useful" in a rather Te valuing manner.
The ''you look like so- and so'' is also based on general guidelines, it's not just subjective crap, it's reading between the lines of someones presentation
You remind me so-and-so who is X type is subjective as fuck, bro. I don't care if I look like someone's grand pappy; it's irrelevant to how one thinks and processes the world.
its actually correlated, thats why its so interesting
Well, ILE or LIE seems to make the most sense since we can clearly see my intuition is off the charts good.
My attitude towards SJWs does make me think Fi PoLR. But aside from that, I'd lean towards LIE. LII makes no sense due to not being an introvert in any sense of the term, especially not based on anything Jung wrote about the subject.
What's correlated? Subjective opinions of some random person online's niece and someone else they happen to think is that type? This is assuming the niece or whomever is typed correctly to begin with, and let's be honest... in many cases, they are not.
Your posts make me think you're Nx HA. But others seem to see an intuitive, and I lack the required knowledge, so wtf do I know.Well, ILE or LIE seems to make the most sense since we can clearly see my intuition is off the charts good.
My attitude towards SJWs does make me think Fi PoLR. But aside from that, I'd lean towards LIE. LII makes no sense due to not being an introvert in any sense of the term, especially not based on anything Jung wrote about the subject.
no, facial and physical features are correlated to sociotype
Some did say LSE for me.
I was tired as hell when I made this video - 4 hrs sleep, so I was a bit more subdued than normal. But still, I am very calm as a rule.
I was expecting SLI due to my chill factor.
That's true.
I must look like the LII type. I didn't think I looked that nerdy but... lol
yeah VI wise you could pass for alpha NT
What type are fat people?
This one woman at work types as LII and acts like it, but she is obese.
whether its Fi ignoring (or suggestive) and Ne HA or Ni ignoring and Fe HA could go either way, but I lean toward the latter, based on the sensory presentation
I don't think I have Fe HA. Explain.
Because I stay up too late and don't look after myself or my health at all. I mentioned this in my original survey thread. I will go to work on 3 hrs sleep if I have to.
I will add that the main task of the Right Superior Parietal Lobule is object-binding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_problem
What we should see Retsu attempting is to use our words to try and create stable categories from which he can then make judgements. Luckily we have a fellow 6th Chakra Perceiver person this time emphasizing the encoding (introverted) region of his conscious thought (LII) instead of the decoding (extraverted) region (ILE) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catego...e_of_judgments
The correct way of communicating to his form of thought is to use a spatial map with which he can make observations that track the dynamic movement of experiences and ideas
https://www.idiagram.com/ideas/visual_models.html
seems pretty straightforward case of 2d valued Fe. HA becomes a dirty word because of stereotypes, so I don't really want to go into what "HA must look like behaviorally" because I believe that's a blind alley reserved for others to explore if they want
If I had 2D Fe, why am I getting types as 1D Fe? Are you trolling us here, Willis?
Anyone can be fat of course, I think the stereotype is that Si egos are usually more fat, but dont quote me on that.
What VI tries to do is trying to discern universal kinds of physical traits in people. This can be body type, piercing/hazy look in the eyes, kind of nose etc.
Being fat can be achieved by everybody, so it's not a very reliable tool for VI
Yep. I initially thought she was SLI but she identifies with LII, acts LII and even tests as one in multiple tests for socioncs, Jung and mbti alike. So LII. *shrug*
In that case you could consider taking LSE into account. That sounds contradictory due to them being Si-creative however being overworked, constantly out of time and trying to function on 3h of sleep does indicate Ni-Polr in LSEs. Personally I find it remarkable that LSEs are able to function under those kind of circumstances. They are still logical and display a quick mind. Which is exactly your case. Besides, I don't think that you're ILE. You're not childlike but look more like... an officer.
As rational and logical as it gets. For the record, bad schedule does not make you full of intuition.
I relate to Si PoLR a lot. I just find LIEs to be pathetic victim types. And that's lame.
Plus I like getting more feedback from everyone here.
I'm impressed I haven't got SEI yet tbh. Not one person for an ethical type seems strange. I have strong opinions on moral issues and used to test as a "feeling" type for years when I was more religious.
Kim Dotcom, the Australian hacker guy who created MegaUpload is a fat LII
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Dotcom
this is the mindset of an ILE to its core, right down the projections
its very clever the way you can extend things and keep them going, I really appreciate that
I'm not sure how that relates to my post. I didn't mention LIEs.I relate to Si PoLR a lot. I just find LIEs to be pathetic victim types. And that's lame.
Plus I like getting more feedback from everyone here.
I'm impressed I haven't got SEI yet tbh. Not one person for an ethical type seems strange. I have strong opinions on moral issues and used to test as a "feeling" type for years when I was more religious.
As a side note: you chose that guy from gone with the wind (if I remember correctly) who was in love with scarlett and she's childlike which is a lttle indicator that you're a caregiver.
That's an interesting typing. I can totally see it.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I choose him because he's alpha and suave AF. Not because of that bitch in the movie. She is annoying and deserves to be alone. lol
E S E
S
E
Where do you see dominant Ne?
Unless he's being one big troll.
I'm wondering where the Ne ego is. I'm as a childlike as an old man. I relate to childlike the least for romance styles.
I haven't seen that movie in years but I remember her being immature, bratty, self-entitled and unfaithful. Or am I thinking of someone else? Who needs that?
Based on the type of woman I find most attractive, I probably would say victim since they are typically the most feminine and submissive overall. Childlike is irritating, caregiver is okay but I don't need a mommy telling me what to do. Aggressors need to learn how to act like women not men.
Either way, she got what she deserved.
Ended up alone with nothing due to her behaviour. Oh well.
I can not think other types than LIE or LSE. You really come off as Ti ignoring.
What is Si PoLR to you?
And as you like to think about romance styles do you see yourself as a caregiver?
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote