Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 161 to 200 of 265

Thread: I'm so tired of people mistyping LIEs...

  1. #161
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,806
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    its not that weird when you consider they have a retarded love affair. well, it makes about as much sense as IEI/LIE/SLI relations being pleasant and mutually supportive, and all the other sorts of contortions this place has come up with to justify the manifest absurdity of the situation. its almost like the people purporting to represent those 3 types are all actually from the same quadra
    I don t even get along with Olimpia...
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  2. #162

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Bertrand is causing me to smile/laugh in this thread...what he writes is mostly true and I admire some of these things being attended to.

    I however have been through something a little similar with @Beautiful sky (Maritsa) where neither of us thought the other belonged at that stage in Delta....we were both correct...we were both mistyped I think and it took a few years before things began to correct themselves somewhat.

    I hope you accomplish in a shorter time frame some of what you have set out to do Bertrand.

  3. #163

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,605
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1. This is all just a clique formed under the unified feeling of animosity against Adam.

    2. This is expected behavior within a social group of people.

    Try to get someone who is not biased against Adam to type him.

  4. #164

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^I am not biased against @Adam Strange...in fact I quite enjoy reading his posts and have no idea really what has occurred for some to be upset with him.

  5. #165

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,605
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shay View Post
    ^I am not biased against @Adam Strange...in fact I quite enjoy reading his posts and have no idea really what has occurred for some to be upset with him.
    Then maybe you'll be vanished from the Gamma quadra by Bertrand, for even daring to have a favorable impression of him?

  6. #166

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Singu View Post
    Then maybe you'll be vanished from the Gamma quadra by Bertrand, for even daring to have a favorable impression of him?
    Maybe and that’s ok...which quadra shall I visit now :-)

  7. #167

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,605
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ah so your nonchalant attitude towards Gamma only proves that you're not a real Gamma! Burn witch!

    And so the true order has been restored, and it only proves that Adam is not a real Gamma...

    And so the witch hunt continues...

  8. #168

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    918
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Singu View Post
    Ah so your nonchalant attitude towards Gamma only proves that you're not a real Gamma! Burn witch!

    And so the true order has been restored, and it only proves that Adam is not a real Gamma...

    And so the witch hunt continues...
    Lol, I often doubt where I fit and question my typing position in Gamma or Socionics in general!

  9. #169
    A fox who wants to play, that's me PrettySavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    TIM
    3w4-8w7-5w6
    Posts
    497
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuivienen View Post
    Maybe I said something different yesterday, but I sincerely meant it then, much as I sincerely mean every word of what I am saying to you right now. My emotional state has merely evolved.


    Funny, I was just thinking something similar. Didn't you accept a friend request from me only a few weeks ago?

    My loyalty is not so easily bought and sold as yours.
    Your emotions haven't "evolved" during a day, you're so delusional and pretentious. They are volatile and your stances so changeable because you're Irrational. It's precisely the fact that you believe in all of them though they so quickly change and even contradict each other that exposes you as not Rational, and certainly not Logical. And no, I'm not attacking you using typism, it's just an assessment of a Socionics category, Rationals are not superior by definition.

    Loyalty to you means not voicing my opinions when it contradicts yours, not addressing a commented targeted at a group that includes me, not denouncing your problematic nature because we're "friends" a.k.a kissing your ass? That's obedience and fear in my book, two beliefs I reject and don't have in my life. I'm not gonna treat people differently when it comes to fuck ups because of my "relationship" with them.

    Also, this is an internet forum, they are all volatile and shouldn't be taken so seriously. And we don't know each other at all, we just discussed sexual preferences for a bit, so chill. I owe you nothing, and you "crossed the line" first.

    Get over yourself and join the real world. What's this, primary school? "You ain't my friend anymore!"


    Quote Originally Posted by Syrup View Post
    what is jan?
    A very famous reaction gif:



    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    this is the most E S E thing I've seen in a while
    Taylor Swift melodrama When is the album coming? Will I be called a snake and get my own "Bad Blood"?

    Did you have to do this?
    I was thinking that you could be trusted
    Did you have to ruin what was shiny?
    Now it's all rusted

    Did you think we'd be fine?
    Still got scars in my back from your knives
    So don't think it's in the past
    These kind of wounds they last and they last
    Now, did you think it all through?
    All these things will catch up to you
    And time can heal, but this won't
    So if you come in my way
    Just don't

    As for Bertrand's last posts, there's a lot of truth and sense in them. See, that's objectivity, it has nothing to do with how you feel about a person. Nobody is all the time, but it's possible if we don't get butthurt about everything.

  10. #170

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,605
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bertrand isn't a rationalist, he's a postmodernist, he uses a kind of postmodernist thinking which could be called Socionicism, which alludes that our understanding of each others and certain phenomena are ultimately limited to our own subjective perspectives, which are allegedly rooted in our types and functions. He says that our thoughts and feelings are ultimately a matter of different perspectives.

    I will further call this thinking Bertrandism, which will make things easier and simpler to understand from now on, because I find this kind of thinking to be unproductive, meaningless and ultimately non-natural and unrealistic. It's the opposite of realism.
    Last edited by Singu; 11-15-2017 at 10:13 AM.

  11. #171
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,235
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    There are so called watered down LIEs out there on toop of some loud ones. Tarantino-like lively LIEs much less.


    On top of my head I can recall very bland but when you scratch the surfae he is actually The Grinch, has money and has secluded himself from others.
    It can be very bland experience that you hardly remember later on.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  12. #172
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    love you guys

  13. #173
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    C'mon, @squark. What does a thought look like?
    For example look at the Temple Grandin thread. In that video, it's really fascinating imo, she talks about how her mind works, how she looks at a problem and what process she goes about it solve it. We don't all have brain scans to show each other like hers, but that's a conversation that can take place, how people differ in how they think. How they look at problems, the way they process and solve them. You think about what the elements mean and how people use them and what this looks like in real life.

    And yeah it's not as easy as - he walks like an SLE, you have to really listen to people and what they say, but it's a lot more interesting isn't it?


    It doesn't have to be limited to specific elements and type either.

    For example, I was reading a study on creativity in math where they had given a few problems to some 16 year old kids and asked them to come up with several different ways to solve them. They weren't difficult questions - they were just looking for how the kids solved them and how they thought about the problems. Out of curiosity I looked at the questions and solved them myself. My first inclination in all but the straightforward arithmetic problem was to solve it with what the researchers called "logical insight." What is logical insight? I'm not going to go backwards and assume that because of how I type it must be Ti, because it might be something else entirely. What does that mean, and how does it compare to other people, and is there a pattern here? Maybe it's where your mind would go first too, maybe it's not, but maybe there is a commonality in how various types of people think about the problems. Those are interesting questions to me.

  14. #174
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    But, I also do think that @Adam Strange is Te, and part of the annoying things he does (the condescending teachery stuff) come from a combination of being Te-lead and his enneagram type. Not all or even most LIEs will come across this way. The behavior isn't the type. But some will come across that way, and they're just as Te as the others. I know a Te-lead quite like Adam, and several who are not at all like him, but they all still are Te lead. You have to ask, what is Te and what does Te thinking look like? And it won't look like a bunch of clones, people are still individuals, but you'll see a kind of thinking they share. A kind of how? sort of thinking, cost/benefit etc. (Rough, not very precise description, hopefully gets point across bc I don't want to mess with details right now)
    I don't see this cost/benefit thing, so if you're ever in the mood for details, I'm curious.


    fwiw, I typed a lot, including some responses to Bertrand and adam, and deleted it all in favor of making this less about adam's type and more about what Te looks like in general, because ultimately my attitude toward his type ties back to how it doesn't fit into my own understanding and not about "ousting" him - as useful as it might be to have him as a reference point, I'm trying not to be a dick ok! i think some important jump-off points for conversation and possible insights were lost but oh well.

  15. #175
    Honorary Ballsack
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    3,361
    Mentioned
    110 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Singu View Post
    Bertrand isn't a rationalist, he's a postmodernist, he uses a kind of postmodernist thinking which could be called Socionicism, which alludes that our understanding of each others and certain phenomena are ultimately limited to our own subjective perspectives, which are allegedly rooted in our types and functions. He says that our thoughts and feelings are ultimately a matter of different perspectives.
    Postmodernism, like socionics, is self-refuting anyways. Bertrand's perspective is just as biased as the rest of us. Why would anyone listen to anyone else if a person's perspective of type is first filtered through their own cognitive functions to begin with.

    This makes me think that socionics should have its own Epic Rap Battle about who is the true, infallible, Golden Typist.

  16. #176
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post

    fwiw, I typed a lot, including some responses to Bertrand and adam, and deleted it all in favor of making this less about adam's type and more about what Te looks like in general, because ultimately my attitude toward his type ties back to how it doesn't fit into my own understanding and not about "ousting" him - as useful as it might be to have him as a reference point, I'm trying not to be a dick ok! i think some important jump-off points for conversation and possible insights were lost but oh well.
    yeah its interesting when they use a person as a bulwark how its like its exactly the most useful data point but at the same time it puts you in a double bind because it comes across as obsessing over them or, worse, bullying

    I think its fair to say the tr3w gammaz see that for what it is

    when all is said and done though, like you said, its a cost/benefit analysis going forward

    the shame is what gets left on the cutting room floor because people make it that way, but c'est la vie

  17. #177
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    yeah its interesting when they use a person as a bulwark how its like its exactly the most useful data point but at the same time it puts you in a double bind because it comes across as obsessing over them or, worse, bullying

    I think its fair to say the tr3w gammaz see that for what it is

    when all is said and done though, like you said, its a cost/benefit analysis going forward

    the shame is what gets left on the cutting room floor because people make it that way, but c'est la vie

    lol tr3w gammas working to protect the ~gamma image~ by looking like bullies bcuz it improves our image obviously! THATS why!

  18. #178
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default



    mind blown

  19. #179
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    To the extent that I care about image I try to reign it in lol..

  20. #180
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    i think you're beautiful

  21. #181
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default


  22. #182
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post
    I don't see this cost/benefit thing, so if you're ever in the mood for details, I'm curious.


    fwiw, I typed a lot, including some responses to Bertrand and adam, and deleted it all in favor of making this less about adam's type and more about what Te looks like in general, because ultimately my attitude toward his type ties back to how it doesn't fit into my own understanding and not about "ousting" him - as useful as it might be to have him as a reference point, I'm trying not to be a dick ok! i think some important jump-off points for conversation and possible insights were lost but oh well.
    Well taking Filatova's description here:

    Quote Originally Posted by Filatova
    LIE – one of the most dynamic psycho-types, he is very active, possesses fast reactions and takes the initiative. He capably calculates his actions so as to be economical. Being engaged in industrial activity he easily translates his thoughts into reality, it is better to put waste to use than to throw it out. Can conceptualize the optimum method of making use of space so that no room is wasted. Thus he precisely comprehends which task is major and which is minor. He attempts to determine the precise order of his preferences: so that minor trifles should not prevent him from carrying out what is deemed the most important task/goal. He applies these same abilities in the realms of his hobbies: should he find something to be impossibly immense he’s able to reasonably limit himself.
    She's talking about Te in LIEs in terms of optimization, being most efficient, and economical in both materials and actions. So in other words, not wasting their time/energy/resources on unproductive things and putting effort towards what will give them the most gains. They have to then decide which is the most important of these things, and that's where a value ranking comes in. Is this more important than that, is this worth that? Or is the result worth what I put into it? That whole process can be simplified into cost/benefit. Am I getting the best value for my money/time/effort whatever the measurement criteria is.

    The thing is, each LIE will have their own set of value judgements as to what matters most, what matters least to them and everything in between. So like the love languages thing, one might say value quality time with their family - their cost/benefit analysis would go something like, "How can I make work most efficient and still earn enough so that I can have more time off with my family?" A different LIE with different values might care most about wealth and status and their cost/benefit would go, "What can I do that will get me the most profit the quickest/easiest?" Someone might even use socionics to come up with something like, "How can I quickly type people/cut through as much effort as possible to get the best relationship?" It's logic of actions, so it's the how and can be applied to things from streamlining a production process to eliminate extra time/steps/material to something small and silly like finding the shortest route to the coffee maker. But it's concrete actions that can be taken.

    Everyone puts values on different things and has importance rankings even if not consciously put in those kinds of terms, but not everyone sees things primarily through the lens of logic of actions/economy of actions/what is this worth to me/what will this cost. There are other ways to look at things and structure them, for example instead of logic of actions, Ti is logic of connections - so it's more a question of does this fit here? Fi with ethics of connections might look at things as in - is this what I want? Ni might be something along the lines of where will this lead? I have to give more thought to these, but you can look at things in all of those different ways regardless of type. It's just for Te leads the main way they will look at things is through Te. And it can be simplified to a cost/benefit sort of thinking - trying to get the most out for the least in.

  23. #183
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    Well taking Filatova's description here:



    She's talking about Te in LIEs in terms of optimization, being most efficient, and economical in both materials and actions. So in other words, not wasting their time/energy/resources on unproductive things and putting effort towards what will give them the most gains. They have to then decide which is the most important of these things, and that's where a value ranking comes in. Is this more important than that, is this worth that? Or is the result worth what I put into it? That whole process can be simplified into cost/benefit. Am I getting the best value for my money/time/effort whatever the measurement criteria is.

    The thing is, each LIE will have their own set of value judgements as to what matters most, what matters least to them and everything in between. So like the love languages thing, one might say value quality time with their family - their cost/benefit analysis would go something like, "How can I make work most efficient and still earn enough so that I can have more time off with my family?" A different LIE with different values might care most about wealth and status and their cost/benefit would go, "What can I do that will get me the most profit the quickest/easiest?" Someone might even use socionics to come up with something like, "How can I quickly type people/cut through as much effort as possible to get the best relationship?" It's logic of actions, so it's the how and can be applied to things from streamlining a production process to eliminate extra time/steps/material to something small and silly like finding the shortest route to the coffee maker. But it's concrete actions that can be taken.

    Everyone puts values on different things and has importance rankings even if not consciously put in those kinds of terms, but not everyone sees things primarily through the lens of logic of actions/economy of actions/what is this worth to me/what will this cost. There are other ways to look at things and structure them, for example instead of logic of actions, Ti is logic of connections - so it's more a question of does this fit here? Fi with ethics of connections might look at things as in - is this what I want? Ni might be something along the lines of where will this lead? I have to give more thought to these, but you can look at things in all of those different ways regardless of type. It's just for Te leads the main way they will look at things is through Te. And it can be simplified to a cost/benefit sort of thinking - trying to get the most out for the least in.
    would you say determining the accuracy and reliability of these shortcuts is more Ti related, or just a matter of intelligence?

  24. #184
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post
    would you say determining the accuracy and reliability of these shortcuts is more Ti related, or just a matter of intelligence?
    My gut response is that it's probably experience-related as in what they've found to work for them or not but intelligence (and use of Ni or Si depending on which Te-lead it is) might allow them to mentally test the consequences without having to actually test them. My brain is running on 3 hours of sleep and I keep spacing out, so I might be missing something important.

  25. #185
    Delilah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    1,497
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Singu View Post
    1. This is all just a clique formed under the unified feeling of animosity against Adam.

    2. This is expected behavior within a social group of people.

    Try to get someone who is not biased against Adam to type him.
    Hmm? I don't think the OP started this thread on the bases you mention here. Besides, there's question around many other forum members' types, including my own, even though not everyone has made themselves into the LIE poster child Adam seems adamant on being lol. Tbh it's a bit weird to me like if there were as much question around my type as there is around Adam's i would at least consider I could have been wrong like look into other types which I've never seen Adam consider.

  26. #186
    Slade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post
    I don't see this cost/benefit thing, so if you're ever in the mood for details, I'm curious.


    fwiw, I typed a lot, including some responses to Bertrand and adam, and deleted it all in favor of making this less about adam's type and more about what Te looks like in general, because ultimately my attitude toward his type ties back to how it doesn't fit into my own understanding and not about "ousting" him - as useful as it might be to have him as a reference point, I'm trying not to be a dick ok! i think some important jump-off points for conversation and possible insights were lost but oh well.
    What does Te look like to you?
    Hey, feel free to PM me with any opinions about my type

  27. #187
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slade View Post
    What does Te look like to you?
    like an orientation toward the use of 'objective' information (objective in this sense meaning substantiatable, verifiable).

    my understanding is mostly based on the stuff i read on wikisocion when i first joined, which wasn't written by Official Russian Socionists, and to some degree, jung, which i know isn't strictly socionics. so if this is bad information, whatever, i can adjust and maybe change my self-typing.

    "Extroverted logic deals with the external activity of objects, i.e the how, what and where of events, activity or work, behavior, algorithms, movement, and actions.

    The how, what and where of events would be the external activity of events, activity or work would be the external activity of a machine or individual(s) and algorithms describe the external activity of objects.

    Since Te perceives objective, factual information outside the subject (external activity) and analyzes the rationale and functionality of what is happening or being done or said. "Quality" to a Te type is how well an object performs the functions for which it was made. A Te type can judge a person to be "effective" if he is able to achieve his purposes without wasting any energy or producing unwanted side effects. So Te types basically evaluate people and things using the same criteria.

    Extroverted logic as base function is manifested as a need to accumulate factual information, also from external sources such as books, second-hand information, etc, on matters of personal interest or of professional activity. This also gives these types confidence on being well-informed on the same matters, which enables them to enter arguments related to them with confidence on their knowledge, which may come across as arrogance to others. Another manifestation is an evaluation of external reality - work activities, world events, finances, procedures, personal relationships, conversations - from the point of view of factual accuracy and "making sense" and efficiency. It leads to an inclination to be proactive in increasing the efficiency and reasonableness of the external world, as well as a sense of self-worth connected on being involved and productive in activities seen as useful, profitable, or that increase one's knowledge base. To give out information that the individual knows not to be factually accurate is disturbing and avoided as much as possible. "
    from the wiki


    "Extraverted thinking, therefore, need not necessarily be a merely concretistic thinking it may equally well be a purely ideal thinking, if, for instance, it can be shown that the ideas with which it is engaged are to a great extent borrowed from without, i.e. are transmitted by tradition and education. The criterion of judgment, therefore, as to whether or no a thinking is extraverted, hangs directly upon the question: by [p. 429] which standard is its judgment governed -- is it furnished from without, or is its origin subjective? A further criterion is afforded by the direction of the thinker's conclusion, namely, whether or no the thinking has a preferential direction outwards. It is no proof of its extraverted nature that it is preoccupied with concrete objects, since I may be engaging my thoughts with a concrete object, either because I am abstracting my thought from it or because I am concretizing my thought with it. Even if I engage my thinking with concrete things, and to that extent could be described as extraverted, it yet remains both questionable and characteristic as regards the direction my thinking will take; namely, whether in its further course it leads back again to objective data, external facts, and generally accepted ideas, or not. So far as the practical thinking of the merchant, the engineer, or the natural science pioneer is concerned, the objective direction is at once manifest. But in the case of a philosopher it is open to doubt, whenever the course of his thinking is directed towards ideas. In such a case, before deciding, we must further enquire whether these ideas are mere abstractions from objective experience, in which case they would merely represent higher collective concepts, comprising a sum of objective facts ; or whether (if they are clearly not abstractions from immediate experience) they may not be derived from tradition or borrowed from the intellectual atmosphere of the time. In the latter event, such ideas must also belong to the category of objective data, in which case this thinking should also be called extraverted. "
    from jung


    ...also, from the wikisocion esi profile Te section:
    "The ESI is attracted to people seen as knowledgeable, as well as truthful and willing to share that knowledge, in matters seen as interesting and useful to the ESI towards achieving productivity and efficiency. Reliable information rather than the finished analysis is what attracts the ESI: facts and explanations, not answers limited to the conclusions, which they tend to see as mere opinions. For the same reason, the ESI avoids people who are inclined to give out unreliable, or simply untruthful, information."

  28. #188
    Honorary Ballsack
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    3,361
    Mentioned
    110 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    She's @lump, she's lump, she's lump
    She's so relaxed.
    She's lump, she's lump, she's lump
    She likes her facts.

  29. #189
    Spermatozoa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Your most intimate spaces
    TIM
    IEE 379 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,972
    Mentioned
    153 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Playing With Fire View Post
    Your emotions haven't "evolved" during a day, you're so delusional and pretentious. They are volatile and your stances so changeable because you're Irrational. It's precisely the fact that you believe in all of them though they so quickly change and even contradict each other that exposes you as not Rational, and certainly not Logical. And no, I'm not attacking you using typism, it's just an assessment of a Socionics category, Rationals are not superior by definition.
    If I am delusional and pretentious, then you are most certainly uptight and reactive.

    Quote Originally Posted by Playing With Fire View Post
    Loyalty to you means not voicing my opinions when it contradicts yours, not addressing a commented targeted at a group that includes me, not denouncing your problematic nature because we're "friends" a.k.a kissing your ass? That's obedience and fear in my book, two beliefs I reject and don't have in my life. I'm not gonna treat people differently when it comes to fuck ups because of my "relationship" with them.
    Well, I can assure you that I'll never ask you to kiss my ass. I imagine that it may not be very hygienic.

    What irks me is that you have chosen to pick a fight with me in public, instead of just sending me a PM. Thus you've encouraged the witch hunt that Bertrand is conducting and that shows a serious lack of insight. Look at the wider context of what's going on before you lash out at someone like this again.

    Quote Originally Posted by Playing With Fire View Post
    Also, this is an internet forum, they are all volatile and shouldn't be taken so seriously. And we don't know each other at all, we just discussed sexual preferences for a bit, so chill. I owe you nothing, and you "crossed the line" first.
    If I recall correctly, you were the one who got triggered by a post I made, to somebody else, and which was not even about you.

    Stop projecting. You are responsible for your own emotions and definitely need to chill out.

    Quote Originally Posted by Playing With Fire View Post
    Get over yourself and join the real world. What's this, primary school? "You ain't my friend anymore!"
    The real world is just another playground to build castles in.

    Quote Originally Posted by Playing With Fire View Post
    Taylor Swift melodrama When is the album coming? Will I be called a snake and get my own "Bad Blood"?
    If you want to feature on my debut album, you will have to give me something that I want in return.

    Unfortunately for you, I don't tend to find counterphobic 6s sexually attractive, so your options are limited.

    Quote Originally Posted by Playing With Fire View Post
    As for Bertrand's last posts, there's a lot of truth and sense in them. See, that's objectivity, it has nothing to do with how you feel about a person. Nobody is all the time, but it's possible if we don't get butthurt about everything.
    The words "Bertrand" and "objectivity" do not belong in the same sentence; they are mutually exclusive

  30. #190
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,806
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well socionics tests are in many ways the only objective information we have to determine the type of a stranger whose life has never truly intersected ours in terms of daily behavior / attitutudes / decisions.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  31. #191
    Delilah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    1,497
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG View Post
    Well socionics tests are in many ways the only objective information we have to determine the type of a stranger whose life has never truly intersected ours in terms of daily behavior / attitutudes / decisions.
    Lol i thought about this, like in Ganin's test i get Eii followed by Esi. Thing is Adam always refers to his MBTI type test. I mean it's a different system. Anyhow, i gotta run

  32. #192

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,605
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well it's like you know, who doesn't care about things like "objective facts", any sane and rational person is going to care about things like that. But then it's also human nature to disregard facts that don't fit in with things that don't agree with what we already believe it to be true, which is called confirmation bias.

    So it just goes to show that this whole thing called "Socionics" is just basically a whole bunch of nonsense, anyway.

  33. #193
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuivienen View Post
    If I am delusional and pretentious, then you are most certainly uptight and reactive.

    can you guys summarize your argument for me I'm having trouble following

  34. #194
    Tigerfadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    1,305
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I kinda feel like those who type themselves LIE's are usually LIE's.

  35. #195
    A fox who wants to play, that's me PrettySavage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    TIM
    3w4-8w7-5w6
    Posts
    497
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuivienen View Post
    If I am delusional and pretentious, then you are most certainly uptight and reactive.

    Yes and? If it's a fact, therefore objective, then it doesn't bother me to hear it.



    Quote Originally Posted by Cuivienen View Post
    Well, I can assure you that I'll never ask you to kiss my ass. I imagine that it may not be very hygienic.

    What irks me is that you have chosen to pick a fight with me in public, instead of just sending me a PM. Thus you've encouraged the witch hunt that Bertrand is conducting and that shows a serious lack of insight. Look at the wider context of what's going on before you lash out at someone like this again.



    If I recall correctly, you were the one who got triggered by a post I made, to somebody else, and which was not even about you.

    Stop projecting. You are responsible for your own emotions and definitely need to chill out.
    That's picking up a fight to you? Geez, I can't imagine how you'd react if I actually had done that.

    I didn't get "triggered". I for once prefer to address people and what they say that bothers me, whether it directly concerns me or not, directly and out in the open. That's a Beta thing, why would I do it behind "closed doors" if it isn't personal?

    That's the point you missed completely: What irritates me is not a possible indirect jab at me, but your whole holier than thou attitude to everyone in this thread. Is uncalled for and completely ridiculous being that you most definitely fit the exact description of people that make you sad with their behavior.

    It was your contradiction and hypocrisy that set me off, nothing else. And what's this whole talk about "emotions"? And wanting to direct them at it? Chill with the Doctor Phil, at least until you seriously identify with an Ethical type.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuivienen View Post
    The real world is just another playground to build castles in.
    Castles? You really are Taylor Swift in disguise. Hey TayTay, I love your new album!




    Quote Originally Posted by Cuivienen View Post
    If you want to feature on my debut album, you will have to give me something that I want in return.

    Unfortunately for you, I don't tend to find counterphobic 6s sexually attractive, so your options are limited.



    The words "Bertrand" and "objectivity" do not belong in the same sentence; they are mutually exclusive
    Cute to see you attempt to be witty using sexual innuendos when clearly, that's not your forte. Nice touch with the blatant sexism, women fucking their way to the top, classy. Not that I'm surprised, it's in line with your beliefs about how women should behave, "work to keep a man and all that".

    And since you missed yet another point: I never implied I'd like to feature on your album, I said I wanted to see what kind of lyrics you'd write about me. Because you know, that's what Bad Blood is: a song and a video made about her "enemies". That clear enough or would you like me to draw it?

    And yes, let's hear it for the old favorite of people who can't come up with a good argument: saying the other person is a counterphobic 6!

    It's the typology world's "your mom" insult, thank you for reinforcing your kindergartener mental age.

    Bertrand fooled enough people into thinking he was LIE for much longer than you, and could potentially continue to type as a Rational for longer if he had cared to go on with it. You had your LIE typing challenged immediately. That says a lot about who's more capable of objectivity between you two.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    can you guys summarize your argument for me I'm having trouble following
    He basically made a gratuitous post whining about how "people" on the thread were behaving in a way that made him sad, only that his description was a word by word recounting of his own attitude all over the forum. I called him out, he responded with a TSwift worthy "you stabbed me in the back, I thought we were friends!!!" post with the weakest jabs ever and now we're here.

    Also, he doesn't know what Bad Blood is and hasn't googled it before making that whole casting couch joke. Which is, you know, embarassing.

  36. #196
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chains View Post
    Postmodernism, like socionics, is self-refuting anyways. Bertrand's perspective is just as biased as the rest of us. Why would anyone listen to anyone else if a person's perspective of type is first filtered through their own cognitive functions to begin with.

    This makes me think that socionics should have its own Epic Rap Battle about who is the true, infallible, Golden Typist.
    Since I chose Eminem as my celebrity parent, in another thread, I want in on a rap battle type.


    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  37. #197
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    In the grim darkness of the far future there are only forums and flood.
    The sad final of the humanity.

  38. #198
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

  39. #199
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    In the grim darkness of the far future there are only forums and flood.
    The sad final of the humanity.


    "Sometimes darkness can show you the light."

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  40. #200
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slade View Post
    Post a video of yourself so we can see what a 'real' LIE looks like.
    Not willing, sorry. Post a video of yourself so we can see what a real whatever-you-are looks like.

    But for the record, I'm very similar to this guy

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •