Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789
Results 321 to 358 of 358

Thread: IR test (by Sol)

  1. #321
    I don't see it that way BFGDoomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Examining the next one
    Posts
    450
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    The sorting of the groups without knowledge of the key which says what types those groups represent. When you know which types are there - you may mix your IR impressions with your expectations by the theory.
    I did do this. I watched the videos, ranked them as well as i could (i had a hard time determining clearly what group i liked better than others, though some were clearly better or worse), and then i looked at key and saw the corresponding types. ILI and ILE were clear favourites, while SEE and SLE put me off most. Why do you think i did the thing you thought i did? Is it because SLE and SEE are both Se doms? AFAIK ILI and ILE are not types traditionally seen as grouped together.
    Nothing is so difficult as not deceiving oneself.

  2. #322
    unrealistic dreamer turd mrrrmaid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    U.K.
    Posts
    217
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xaiviay View Post
    Ehhh for what this is worth, I relate to all of this to a 'T'. I don't think of this as strong Ni. Ni is when you have a gut feeling about how something will turn out in the future. Following impulse has more to do with Si ('I do what I want right now, and I don't listen to the warnings of the future because who really knows what might really happen'). Usually following my Si impulses turns out well for me, also. There are only a few times I really regret not having used Ni beforehand.


    I think I generally "know" what's best for me but idk if that's iNtuition or just me trying to rationalise dumb impulses. I'd say it's less about "I need to try this new thing" and more "this thing will be better for me" so mb that's Ni>Ne?

    I'm trying to just study & understand socionics basics so I'm not over saturating the forum with my n00bness and identity issues but it's not going well.
    "I take back like half of the exclamation points.....they make me look....eager to please. Which I AM....but I don't want anyone to KNOW that"
    - Carrie Fisher

  3. #323
    Xaiviay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    TIM
    SEI-Fe1, 9w8 sx/sp
    Posts
    355
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mrrrmaid View Post
    I think I generally "know" what's best for me but idk if that's iNtuition or just me trying to rationalise dumb impulses. I'd say it's less about "I need to try this new thing" and more "this thing will be better for me" so mb that's Ni>Ne?

    I'm trying to just study & understand socionics basics so I'm not over saturating the forum with my n00bness and identity issues but it's not going well.
    I generally 'know' what's best for me too...but as for the second part, that could suggest Ni > Ne. But SEIs generally don't take the initiative in Ne matters anyways, they let the Ne-egos bring them along for new, novel activities. This doesn't really change my opinion of you likely being Ne-valuing over Ni-valuing...

    Ehhh, well I could always be wrong, and I'm also trying not to saturate the forum with my n00bness, lol xD it's good that you're getting more points of view. Studying is good

  4. #324

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BFGDoomer View Post
    I did do this.
    Good. But you did not do full types sorting list as was recommended. That would said about your type more, in case you seriously did the procedure and followed the minimums to watch.

    From your message follows: 2 top (ILI, ILE), 2 bottom (SLE, SEE) types. In those top you are not totally sure ("it seems"). The place of all other types is not clear too, except ESE, LII, EIE are not near the bottom.
    There are signes that you are attracted to base N types, while have no interest to base S - this points to possible S type, more for base S. The more types among you've mentioned as liked are Ne/Si valued ones. While all reported as disliked are Ni/Se valued - and this is their leading function, the most noticed trait. You may to have Si type. Your choice to top and bottom only of P types points on your P type, as they are more important for you. Among Si types, according to the chaos in your room, only P types fit too.
    Based on this, there is the possibility that your type is SLI or SEI. More for SLI, as personal sympathy to SEI's superego (ILI) and subrevisie (EIE) is lesser possible than disliking for SLI's his mirages (SEE) and the sympathy to revisor (ESE), orderer (LII), conflictor (EIE). Revisors are perceived more as interesting people and orderers as charming ones. Conflictors may be perceived positively at the distance easily, - cute girls in my perception, for example.

    > Why do you think i did the thing you thought i did?

    There was no the assertion that you've rejected the blind sorting. I've mentioned what should was being done, where I was sure only in that you did not list all the types as was recommended. Though, I supposed the higher possibility that with the rejecting of one important recommendation you could to reject other ones too.

    > ILI and ILE are not types traditionally seen as grouped together.

    Types with neutral and good IR mb close in your sympathies. It's so for SLI.
    The situation with those types at top is more doubtful for LII as your type.

    Your results show significant possibility for my main opinion about your type as SLI.
    To distinguish which one is more possible between LII and SLI try to understand which types are more psychically comfortable for you: ESE or IEE, ESE+EIE or IEE+ILE. I think you are close to the understanding.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  5. #325
    I don't see it that way BFGDoomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Examining the next one
    Posts
    450
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Sol

    Thank you for taking the time, i appreciate your willingness to help and educate me very much.

    I notice that i am 'activated' by Fe base types - ESE and EIE make me 'come alive' and have the ability to ignite me. Ne dom types, ILE and IEE i more feel familiar with their way of seeing patterns, i can easily follow the threads and i understand the viewpoint, though i can in specific occasions find it needlessly erratic.
    I feel independent in inspiration, creative thinking and following many abstract ideas to various tangents, while i feel at the mercy of people who express good atmosphere and know how to dwell in comfort and good emotions. I do not seek close personal contact or people who ignite inspiration and novel experience very much. I am always to preoccupied with constant interest and thinking hobbies that i never seem to be in a state of equilibrium in mind or body. (not in a bad way, i'm just always in motion thought-wise, circulating interests and synthesizing knowledge from various fields of importance and connecting them to serve my main mental sight in a given moment)

    Thank you for the analysis in any case, i will study IR with others even more to spot if SLI is the main possibility, though i feel most learned around Si and Fe Ego from what i have analysed so far. (though i also seem to value when Te does practical things for me, as i am not interested in learning such and i am bad with things regarding hand work, something Socionics relates normally to delta ST, AFAIK)

    Is there any significant possibility of me being EII, SEI or ILI?

    PS. when watching videos, LII girl 3 seemed to resemble my own way of speech when i am immersed, per my own observation. I get shy around cameras and videos, but this might be my own self-deception.
    Nothing is so difficult as not deceiving oneself.

  6. #326

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BFGDoomer View Post
    Is there any significant possibility of me being EII, SEI or ILI?
    After IR test - no.
    ILE is subrevisie for EII, ILI is superego for SEI, SEE/SLE are good for ILI.

    SLI seems fits better than any other type to IR results. As SLI also was supposed by VI, the possibility it's correct is high. Your seen behavior fits to SLI too.
    Pay more attention to IEE girls. They should be your duals, not Fe ones. Revisors and conflictors can be attractive and interesting, you may have surface relations and cooperation with them, but in close friendship or romance you'll feel better having good IR.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  7. #327
    I don't see it that way BFGDoomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Examining the next one
    Posts
    450
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    After IR test - no.
    ILE is subrevisie for EII, ILI is superego for SEI, SEE/SLE are good for ILI.

    SLI seems fits better than any other type to IR results. As SLI also was supposed by VI, the possibility it's correct is high. Your seen behavior fits to SLI too.
    Pay more attention to IEE girls. They should be your duals, not Fe ones. Revisors and conflictors can be attractive and interesting, you may have surface relations and cooperation with them, but in close friendship or romance you'll feel better having good IR.
    I will take note of your judgement. Thank you.

    I may relate most to SLI in test and by your opinion of my VI, but i do not relate to any SLI description or Model A structure in any matter i would consider significant. I will continue to speculate in any case.
    Nothing is so difficult as not deceiving oneself.

  8. #328

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BFGDoomer View Post
    i do not relate to any SLI description or Model A structure
    With better theory and yourself understanding you'll may notice that you fit to SLI's descriptions better than to descriptions of other types.
    When you'll start to get regularly good fiting to IR theory of your opinion about own type and about types of people near (typed by you) - then you'll get the reasonable basis to trust in own correct type, to own typing skills and with this in acceptable theory understanding.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  9. #329
    I don't see it that way BFGDoomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Examining the next one
    Posts
    450
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    With better theory and yourself understanding you'll may notice that you fit to SLI's descriptions better than to descriptions of other types.
    When you'll start to get regularly good fiting to IR theory of your opinion about own type and about types of people near (typed by you) - then you'll get the reasonable basis to trust in own correct type, to own typing skills and with this in acceptable theory understanding.
    I seem to fit LII very well in IR with others, whom i'm fairly certain of type wise. Of course this says nothing if i fundamentally misunderstand the theory, which i am still open to, though i doubt it with regards to the central aspects. It was good to hear your thoughts.
    Nothing is so difficult as not deceiving oneself.

  10. #330
    I don't see it that way BFGDoomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Examining the next one
    Posts
    450
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @crAck
    Hm. This could be a factor, of course.

    I will say that i did not have these thoughts while researching SLI type, i was also mostly trying to fit the IE's into model A while reading about the functions/elements to find a match. I react well to good atmosphere and creation of stability, i am not interested in the lives of others on an individual level, i have no interest in efficiency if it does not fit my particular scope, i am not observant or skilled in regards to living space, food, etc.

    I am outwardly lacking and seem lazy with regards to establishment of relations/involvement socially and i need someone to fill me in on how to relate to problems of a physical nature, how to create equilibrium in body etc.

    But in my mind i am categorical, nimble and diligent. I'm not at all someone who ''goes with the flow'' or takes it easy, internally.

    The only types i really see as significantly possible, according to Model A, would be LII or ILE now. (which i know isn't all that the theory encapsulates)

    Rather, i see qualities in SLI type that i wished i possessed, and i see as very positive.

    Though, you and Sol have me pegged as SLI (at least initially), and that's gotta count for something, so i am still very open to the idea, i just can't see enough justification yet. (as in arguments based on how model a shines through my posts, video etc.)
    Last edited by BFGDoomer; 09-09-2018 at 09:32 PM.
    Nothing is so difficult as not deceiving oneself.

  11. #331

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BFGDoomer View Post
    I seem to fit LII very well in IR with others
    IR check needs the correct types, and such with my examples have pointed that LII is doubtful for you. As your results have matched good with my opinion gotten by other method independently, this much rises the meaning of SLI version. Also I've pointed you on significant contradictions in your behavior with LII.
    Read Filatova's book and Jung's one, - it's better introduction to the types than random, badly translated and heretic mess on English sites. Being T-S type with the practice step-by-step you'll understand what is correct.
    As our discussion repeats we may finish it. Study the subject some better.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  12. #332
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    131
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I took a look at the ESI people and the blonde viking guy who does the asmr is freaking hawt.

  13. #333
    I don't see it that way BFGDoomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Examining the next one
    Posts
    450
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    IR check needs the correct types, and such with my examples have pointed that LII is doubtful for you. As your results have matched good with my opinion gotten by other method independently, this much rises the meaning of SLI version. Also I've pointed you on significant contradictions in your behavior with LII.
    Read Filatova's book and Jung's one, - it's better introduction to the types than random, badly translated and heretic mess on English sites. Being T-S type with the practice step-by-step you'll understand what is correct.
    As our discussion repeats we may finish it. Study the subject some better.
    I can point to contradictions according to SLI behaviour as well, though this is useless if i have only oriented myself in misleading theory.

    Filatova descriptions on this site i relate (with my faulty theory according to you, so this means nothing) most to LII. Are the books the only reliable source for me to study?

    I will keep researching IR and own processes and thoughts. For now LII seems most likely to me. I will hopefully resolve the different perspectives when i study some more.
    Nothing is so difficult as not deceiving oneself.

  14. #334
    unrealistic dreamer turd mrrrmaid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    U.K.
    Posts
    217
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eos View Post
    I took a look at the ESI people and the blonde viking guy who does the asmr is freaking hawt.
    nooooo I clicked on him because I thought he looked hot but then I watched the video and I hated him
    sooo creepy and intense
    "I take back like half of the exclamation points.....they make me look....eager to please. Which I AM....but I don't want anyone to KNOW that"
    - Carrie Fisher

  15. #335
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    131
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mrrrmaid View Post
    nooooo I clicked on him because I thought he looked hot but then I watched the video and I hated him
    sooo creepy and intense
    ya i love it, its cute and adorable. endless entertainment and dynamics. a hint of sadness in there which im guessing is the Fi. grrr. id marry that man. actually one of the hottest men ive ever seen online. Norsemen do it for me.

  16. #336

    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Italy
    TIM
    LII-Ti 1w2 sp/so
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ASMR in general is pretty creepy (and annoying) to me. Can't say I understand the appeal. I am trying to determine your type, stop whispering at me seductively, gosh darn it.

  17. #337
    I don't see it that way BFGDoomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Examining the next one
    Posts
    450
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Overthinker View Post
    ASMR in general is pretty creepy (and annoying) to me. Can't say I understand the appeal. I am trying to determine your type, stop whispering at me seductively, gosh darn it.
    Had the same reaction. The whispering made it hard for me to feel out the energy i was supposed to relate to.
    Nothing is so difficult as not deceiving oneself.

  18. #338
    hag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,667
    Mentioned
    273 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default the ILEs (from my POV)


  19. #339

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @hag
    typing by teeth is nice

    Quote Originally Posted by mrrrmaid View Post
    > blonde viking guy
    nooooo I clicked on him because I thought he looked hot but then I watched the video and I hated him. sooo creepy and intense
    you just do not like guys with horns




    Quote Originally Posted by Overthinker View Post
    ASMR in general is pretty creepy (and annoying) to me
    use headphones. it seems acts through oveloading. so you need to relax and allow yourself to be annoyed in the correct way
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  20. #340
    hag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,667
    Mentioned
    273 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    @hag
    typing by teeth is nice
    here's what I've got going so far.

    buck teeth = IEE because of the resemblance with rabbits. why are rabbits and IEEs correlated? fuck you. this is my life.
    primate-like smile showing all teeth = SLE, it's their way of asserting dominance. what? showing teeth is a sign of submission in primates, you say? well, scientists are lousy bitches and them's the facts.
    cavities = Si PoLR. why? because everyone worth their salt in the socionics community knows Si PoLR means bad hygiene. it's just common sense, if you will.
    gold tooth = Flavor Flav, SEE benchmark and type codifier, has gold teeth, therefore, we can reasonably assume gold teeth to be a pattern among SEEs.

    To Be Continued.

  21. #341

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hag View Post
    why are rabbits and IEEs correlated?
    IEE have suggestive Si and hence need sex very much. Rabbits are known as having sex very often. We may notice the correlation. Also to have sex often they need to charm good - definetely Fi type. Such this works, Watson. *smokes*

    > primate-like smile showing all teeth = SLE, it's their way of asserting dominance

    the specifics of SLE smiles is the lack of some teeth as they like to fight in the degree rabbits like the sex. meanwhile having problematic Fi they have issues with getting the sex without force what needs the trait of "asserting dominance" just to breed

    > cavities = Si PoLR. why? because everyone worth their salt in the socionics community knows Si PoLR means bad hygiene

    Si polr leads to that cooked meal regularly overburns or dries up (as eating of bad meal gets the delays). such it becomes solid and hence the teeth wear out quicker

    > gold tooth = Flavor Flav, SEE benchmark and type codifier, has gold teeth, therefore, we can reasonably assume gold teeth to be a pattern among SEEs

    gold tooth is the clear trait of Se valued types which have aesthetics interests lower than the wish to show they have redundant money. also in the case of Se ego types, which are some predisposed to paranoia, to keep the gold in the mouth is the good way to have the money under the sight to reduce the chance they would be stolen
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  22. #342
    Chakram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    179
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    @Chakram
    do not spoiler the key

    The test needs you to _sort_ the types by the said criterion.
    I didn't spoiler it, I had no idea what the types were when I went through it, this was just my "intuitive" impression of each type. I could sort this into a list from what I believe I liked the most to least if that is more helpful?

  23. #343
    Chakram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    179
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Sol Ok, I sorted them instead of just saying impressions:

    1 EIE - I like them the most pretty easily, they seemed very sweet and like-able.
    2 SLI - One of the girls was very funny, 2/3 of them seemed like I would get along with.
    3 SEI - They seem ok, I liked them for the most part
    4 LSI - 2/3 of them seemed good, no English speaking females so hard to judge entirely.

    5 IEI - They seem ok, a couple I liked quite a bit.
    6 ESE - Crazy, about 50/50 funny/annoying, they seem ok but I probably couldn't deal with them for a long period of time.
    7 IEE - Seem nice, kind of like them.
    8 SLE - They seemed ok, good at presenting information.

    9 ESI - They seemed decent, somewhere in the middle.
    10 EII - They seemed ok, kind of mouse-like, a little boring, very vulnerable.
    11 LIE - No idea what to make of them.
    12 SEE - A bit boring.

    13 LII - Boring.
    14 LSE - Boring and weird, difficult to listen to.
    15 ILI - Boring, nerdy, weird.
    16 ILE - Not too sure, kind of annoying.
    Last edited by Chakram; 09-23-2018 at 05:56 PM.

  24. #344

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Chakram

    conflictors at 2 top is fascinating

    you prefer Fe/Ti valued types: 6/8 of top
    all beta is on top, while other quadras have <=2 types
    you prefer I types - 4/5 of the top
    among Fe/Ti valued E types: ESE, ILE, EIE, SLE
    ILE, ESE have subrevisie at top 4, 2 alphas at bottom 4 - rather doubtful
    points to: EIE, SLE
    more for EIE: his superego+subrevisie at 4 bottom, more S types at top 4, his dual is higher and some other
    Last edited by Sol; 09-24-2018 at 02:51 PM.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  25. #345
    Chakram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    179
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    @Chakram
    fix pls the above message with impressions where you've opened the key - you may place the strings with types there in the sorted by the criterion or in random order

    conflictors at 2 top is fascinating

    you prefer Fe/Ti valued types: 6/8 of top
    all beta is on top, while other quadras have <=2 types
    you prefer I types - 4/5 of the top
    among Fe/Ti valued E types: ESE, ILE, EIE, SLE
    ILE, ESE have subrevisie at top 4, 2 alphas at bottom 4 - rather doubtful
    points to: EIE, SLE
    more for EIE: his superego+subrevisie at 4 bottom, more S types at top 4, his dual is higher and some other
    I'm a mess

  26. #346

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chakram View Post
    I'm a mess
    Find people IRL which you liked/disliked by impressions close to the criterion of good/bad IR. Try to understand their types and what is common in them. Mb you'll notice you like and feel better with betas.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  27. #347

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    FarDraft's results who was earlier assumed as LII by my VI, and also got LII by dichotomy test like MBTI .

    "primary (favourite): ESE, LIE, ILI, EIE
    secondary: ILE, EII, SEI, LSI
    tertiary: ESI, IEI, LSE, SLI
    quaternary (least favourite): IEE, SEE, LII, SLE"
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  28. #348

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hag 2 View Post
    didnt he say he got "ILI" by mbti?
    INTJ what is LII. J in MBTI and rationality in Socionics have identical descriptions. MBT uses dichotomies as main typing way, but not functions to do the J/P exchange (what someones strangely do still)

    > if he strongly Ego-values ILI traits and character

    different nontypes factors may influence on strange placements, besides badly done testing and possible mistypings
    for example, having important people of those types and mixing good feelings to them with IR impressions
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  29. #349
    FarDraft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    TIM
    ILI-Te 5w6 Sp/Sx
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    FarDraft's results who was earlier assumed as LII by my VI, and also got LII by dichotomy test like MBTI .

    "primary (favourite): ESE, LIE, ILI, EIE
    secondary: ILE, EII, SEI, LSI
    tertiary: ESI, IEI, LSE, SLI
    quaternary (least favourite): IEE, SEE, LII, SLE"
    I got ILI on the socionics test. I typed INTJ on the MBTI test.

  30. #350
    FarDraft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    TIM
    ILI-Te 5w6 Sp/Sx
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hag 2 View Post
    didnt he say he got "ILI" by mbti? mightve misread.

    anyway, yeah, what stood out as weird to me if hes ILI is is ESE is #1 but SEE is 3rd last.

    furthermore, if he strongly Ego-values ILI traits and character, that explains why LIE and ILI are in the top - a sort of "aspirational" Ego thing there.


    bonus: for ILI, Mirage and Semi-dual being in the last group is also just... backwards. theres strong attraction in that ITR. (ignoring LII, because evidently he hates himself (see wannabe ILI-like syndrome comment above))
    I scored ILI on the socionics test. INTJ on MBTI dichotomies test.

  31. #351
    FarDraft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    TIM
    ILI-Te 5w6 Sp/Sx
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hag 2 View Post

    bonus: for ILI, Mirage and Semi-dual being in the last group is also just... backwards. theres strong attraction in that ITR. (ignoring LII, because evidently he hates himself (see wannabe ILI-like syndrome comment above))
    What do you mean by the part in brackets?

  32. #352

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FarDraft View Post
    I scored ILI on the socionics test. INTJ on MBTI dichotomies test.
    Functional tests, like that one, differ. Dichotomies tests in Socionics are same as MBTI.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  33. #353
    fka Avebury
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    1,131
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Sol

    I got ILI on the aimtoknow beta test.

    I'm interested in taking this IR test, I will start watching the videos maybe tomorrow. I'll keep you posted.

  34. #354
    fka Avebury
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    1,131
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ok, my results are in.


    The types are sorted by most comfortable (1) to least (16).

    1. LSI
    2. LIE
    3. ESE
    4. SLE
    5. ILE
    6. ESI
    7. SEE
    8. EII
    9. SLI
    10. ILI
    11. EIE
    12. IEE
    13. IEI
    14. LII
    15. SEI
    16. LSE


    I took alot of notes during the process about my impressions.
    Last edited by TheUltimateEmcee; 10-02-2018 at 05:03 PM.

  35. #355
    Arachno-mammal (reproductive mule) A Moderator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Mod Box
    TIM
    LSI- Se C 6
    Posts
    1,136
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well will you look at that.
    Santa Claus: That probably comes from the inherent profit motive of the bourgeoisie mentality.
    Santa Claus: Even on a cold day, a Coke is refreshing.

  36. #356

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Avebury

    Among S types you prefer Se (4/5 at top half, 2 Si at bottom 4, only Si at bottom half) - beta, gamma. Not base Ne, at least.
    May prefer T types (base T at top 2, 4/5 at top 5), 2 base T at bottom - more possible F.
    then: EIE, IEI, SEE, ESI. more for J ones. by the behavior IEI mb excluded. SEE is doubtful as has superego near the top, while dual and semidual are rather below superego and suborderie
    among T types I exclude base T by the behavior and also doubtful by IR, then: ILE, SLE, ILI, SLI. ILE mb rejected by IR. SLE also as has the dual at bottom and the suborderie at top. SLI is similarly doubtful as has the subrevisie at top and the dual near the bottom.

    in sum: EIE, ESI, ILI
    among them both J types have the dual at top and superego at bottom. you prefer J types some more. against ILI is also that you have higher interest to T types
    EIE has more chances than ESI, as LSI and LSE are at 1 and 16. ESI has the subrevisie at top.
    EIE is close to your previous opinion about own type

    if you'll post a videointerview mb this will add more useful
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  37. #357

    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Italy
    TIM
    LII-Ti 1w2 sp/so
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think I will be doing this too, one day or another. Very curious as to what the result might be.

  38. #358

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,402
    Mentioned
    714 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Overthinker View Post
    I think I will be doing this too, one day or another. Very curious as to what the result might be.
    I recommend you pm me your videointerview for the typing, as this test is a supportive tool. As you may see several types are possible in the results, while you need a single type.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •