Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 160 of 480

Thread: IR test (by Sol)

  1. #121
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    LSE are terrible, upset you 2nd day. get SLE until there are some
    stop insulting LSE, u ungrateful ESI, tsk

  2. #122
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pinoline View Post
    stop insulting LSE
    This happens unintentionally cause I'm not perfect.

  3. #123
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    This happens unintentionally cause I'm not perfect.
    It's nice to see u recognize urself at least ^__^

  4. #124
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pinoline View Post
    It's nice to see u recognize urself at least ^__^
    Yes, I recognize myself as LSE. ~15 years

  5. #125

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    What to use as the _sorting_ criterion is said there clearly and unambiguously.
    Romantic feelings are mentioned _only_ about which _examples_ to use.
    I'm sorry, the English in the first post is a bit broken so it's not very clear that that's the sorting criterion. Was not unambiguous to me at all. I find it better to ask when it's like that.


    > I suggest you remove that part, "which causes romantic passion" and only emphasize the "friendly sympathy and psychic comfort" in place of it.

    To take into account sexual orientation is important. I may make additional note to don't use romantic feelings for sorting, as seems some people got confused.
    Fay mentioned physical attractiveness, probably she initially made similar mistake and maybe corrected later. Also a girl on socioforum seems did same.
    Yeah, you could put it like you said it now, it was clearer that way to me at least.


    > OK great now I see what you meant and what was making it so ambiguous.

    The most ambiguous thing seems is how F-N types understand what is needed in the test. I need to ask several EII about which criterion they'd sorted T types of own quadra vs T types of opposite quadra. Yep, I plan to hang on a neck of several people in Internet with this question to check is the current criterion acceptable for them too.
    F/N generally is not very unambiguous stuff.
    Last edited by Myst; 09-19-2017 at 10:19 AM.

  6. #126
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
    I'm sorry, the English is a bit broken
    Then my Russian is broken too similarly, as I've mentioned same problem there. There was no language problem, as I used simple sentences. What is confirmed by that you have not offered better form of the text to say same, but offered to change the sense of text.

  7. #127

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Then my Russian is broken too similarly, as I've mentioned same problem there. There was no language problem, as I used simple sentences. What is confirmed by that you have not offered better form of the text to say same, but offered to change the sense of text.
    It really is aimed at form (presentation) though. Anyway, it's good to have clarified the issue before I started watching the stuff.

  8. #128
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
    It really is aimed at form (presentation) though. Anyway, it's good to have clarified the issue before I started watching the stuff.
    For me as S type also sometimes is harder to understand "what is needed". I generally prefer to re-read and to copy what was said to me to get confirmation that I've understood correctly. Similarly, when I say something important I prefer to repeat this several times (sometimes in variations) to be sure the opponent have understood and remembered me correctly.

  9. #129
    ooo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    the bootie
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    uuuuuuh I'm in luv




  10. #130
    nyessss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    TIM
    female
    Posts
    159
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IR test, so this test is only for IEEs?

  11. #131
    squark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    287 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by muhtempus View Post
    IR test, so this test is only for IEEs?
    IR is meant to stand for Intertype Relationships in this case rather than NeFi. Also, all types were chosen by Sol and this is his experiment, so it depends on how much you trust his typings.

  12. #132
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
    it depends on how much you trust his typings
    Also I need video-interview. As in other case the results will be useless, - I'll can't to understand did the test worked good or not.

    > IR is meant to stand for Intertype Relationships in this case rather than NeFi.

    This may be also thought as a play of words, as the test mostly uses Ne and Fi functions.
    Last edited by Sol; 09-22-2017 at 05:45 PM.

  13. #133

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    (Just note. Didn't forget this. I really want to get back to this asap.)

  14. #134
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
    Just note. Didn't forget this. I really want to get back to this asap.
    I think your video would be good to see. As you find Si as important thing in your life.
    For example, Se for me is just "be there", I'm not a fan of such stuff - I may dream something in that region, but it's not what I'd want to deal with in reality - like to play computer games VS kill real people at war.

  15. #135

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    I think your video would be good to see. As you find Si as important thing in your life.
    For example, Se for me is just "be there", I'm not a fan of such stuff - I may dream something in that region, but it's not what I'd want to deal with in reality - like to play computer games VS kill real people at war.
    If this wasn't clear in my post before, let me say I find the Se approach important too. I prefer to focus on Se in a conscious way while Si is in the background more as some extra grounding and to take care of dual's PoLR in an unobtrusive way . Without discussing it too much. The original point was that it's quite a strong function and it will still have some output without focusing on it too much directly (again, especially useful for Si PoLR).

    Btw Se isn't just war, that's an extreme form of it lol, I don't want war in my country either, don't want that kind of chaos here.

  16. #136
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
    If this wasn't clear in my post before, let me say I find the Se approach important too.
    The situation is I don't find my Se so meaningful in my interests or even better than Si, - what you report about 8th function. What I have fits to theory, while you have something strange and rises chance for other types.

  17. #137

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    The situation is I don't find my Se so meaningful in my interests or even better than Si, - what you report about 8th function. What I have fits to theory, while you have something strange and rises chance for other types.
    What I described actually fits the basic Socionics model.


    EDIT: to clarify, I never said Si was better than Se for me. Si is a stronger function than Se but not "better" for me in the sense of how much it's meaningful.
    Last edited by Myst; 10-05-2017 at 05:35 PM.

  18. #138
    Melodies from Mars~
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    1,016
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    LSI > ILI > SEI > LII in order of attractiveness


  19. #139
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,800
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    My general impressions towards these:

    01- Good, most of the people seemed sweet and likable.

    02- Potentially negative, put me on edge and felt guarded towards them

    03 Neutral, seemed ok-ish and that's about it

    04 Good, seem like that people would make great buddies to hang out and work together on stuff with

    05 Ok I suppose, wouldn't mind them as aquaintances

    06 Neutral, people I'd just have casual relationships with and amusingly watch from a distance

    07 Again Neutral, not much opinion either way towards them.

    08 Fun if a bit potentially obnoxious, mostly good though

    09 A bit too flightly and annoying for my taste but good though mostly

    10 Ok put aren't really people I think I'd connect with very much

    11 Somewhat guarded, not really people I see myself interacting with much but could get along if needed

    12 Good/very good, seemed like fun and pleasant people

    13 Good/ok, a bit talkative but still seemed pleasant

    14 Good, fun if a bit too "Wild and crazy"

    15 Neutral

    16 Guarded, seemed a bit overbearing
    Last edited by Muddy; 10-07-2017 at 01:07 AM.

  20. #140
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Muddy
    To do not open the key, where you've described impressions: remove types numbers and sort types by socion order or randomly, please.

    > Very Good: SEI, LIE, EII, ESE

    If you've chosen befor opening the key, this points to possible LII.

  21. #141
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,800
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    @Muddy
    To do not open the key, where you've described impressions: remove types numbers and sort types by socion order or randomly, please.

    > Very Good: SEI, LIE, EII, ESE

    If you've chosen befor opening the key, this points to possible LII.
    I removed the types off each corresponding number if that pleases you.

    I skimmed them all then examined each one by one using the key after each one. I sneak peeked a few admittedly after the skim but most of them matched my guessed impression anyway. (Typings seemed pretty good btw)

  22. #142
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muddy View Post
    I removed the types off each corresponding number if that pleases you.
    That pleases the ones which will do this test as they need the key stay closed.

    > I skimmed them all then examined each one by one using the key after each one.

    So you partly sorted with opened key. It's lesser correctly.

    > Typings seemed pretty good btw

    At least, someone thinks such (besides me).
    There are more women examples, so to do this test for men is easier. Also Ne type may help, besides opened key.

  23. #143
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    There was an unexpected level of consistency in my two most-liked ones: # and # turned out to be SEI and SLI lol. And I type IEE currently. Go figure. I really hated the ESI ones lol. I saw one/two of those videos and I was like, "NOPE!"

    I didn't pick SEI because I felt like they would be a bit more critical of me or that they would be paying attention to me in a way I didn't like. SLI just seemed chill.

    This video was the one I liked best: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-T1OiRQ0

    I think that it's important to notice that there are some parts of us that we want to keep to ourselves. That's the privacy part of being an individual. I think certain types have different abilities to read different sides of you. Duals leave the sides of you that you want to be left alone, alone. Other types will impinge on those private places. You could probably say this in Socionics terms, but I think that demeans the significance of this idea.
    Last edited by Aramas; 10-07-2017 at 02:04 PM. Reason: Removing numbers

  24. #144
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    my two most-liked ones: 12 and 15 turned out to be SEI and SLI lol. And I type IEE currently.
    Was this gotten with the closed key?

    > Duals leave the sides of you that you want to be left alone, alone.

    The main trait of duals - the help in superid regions. You feel pleasure, more harmony with yourself, rise of energy.
    You seems say about weak nonvalued regions. Duals help and support you there softly, without significant criticism and don't push there oddly. You can't just leave "alone" any of 8 functions as they are similarly important. Duals may help on conscious or unconscious levels. Even when I'm just close to *II types, I feel lesser anxiety - I copy their emotional state, while get no supressing effects from Ni.

  25. #145
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Was this gotten with the closed key?

    > Duals leave the sides of you that you want to be left alone, alone.

    The main trait of duals - the help in superid regions. You feel pleasure, more harmony with yourself, rise of energy.
    You seems say about weak nonvalued regions. Duals help and support you there softly, without significant criticism and don't push there oddly. You can't just leave "alone" any of 8 functions as they are similarly important. Duals may help on conscious or unconscious levels. Even when I'm just close to *II types, I feel lesser anxiety - I copy their emotional state, while get no supressing effects from Ni.
    Why would I have read the key first? It would defeat the purpose . Of course, I had an idea that # was SLI based on the old Jewish looking dude. I'm kinda good at VI myself. I guessed # was IEI. Lol. So maybe this doesn't work quite as well for people who already know how to type others. But I was being honest with my attempt still.

    Also, with regards to what you said about functions, I'm not sure what I said was necessarily due to Socionics even though it's related it seems.

    I went through the ones I liked originally a second time. It was then that I was able to narrow things down or give a secondary impression that contradicted the first.
    Last edited by Aramas; 10-07-2017 at 02:13 PM. Reason: Removing numbers

  26. #146
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maniac View Post
    You're pathetic if you actually think there is a perfect match out there for everyone that is going to "save" you.

    In believing in that fairy-tale you're ruining for yourself and not living to your full potential because people use it as an excuse, which is why socionics and duality is complete bs. I do not care for "teaching" others, that's awfully unattractive in people, when they can't handle their own. As I see it, everyone is alone, "life is a mystery, everyone must stand alone". I generally could not care less what other people do but if they're preaching their fairy-tales right infront of me like this...well online.

    Hey now. It sounds like you're just a bit salty about something. Calling someone pathetic just because you think they're idealistic isn't really justified, though, right?

  27. #147
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    Why would I have read the key first?
    Some people were impatient, especially P types tend for this.
    So hurrah, we got 1st good fit to the theory, - in case you'll place your video to check your type is ENFP indeed. It would be useful to see the full sorting from you, but seems you've limited the sorting by 2 "best" types befor opening the key.
    You sorted by women, men or both? You've pointed to man example, so I'm curious.

    > I had an idea that # was SLI based on the old Jewish looking dude.

    as the most Jewish type I find ILI - they more relate to credits having Ni related to time, also Ni relates to mysticism

    > I guessed # was IEI. Lol.

    when EII man did this test, he've guessed correctly 50% of types groups. that EII was a novice. Ne and Fi are main functions used there. but he sorted strangely - he prefered own type, while all S-T went to bottom. he said that men examples he could to sort more classically, but did not try this

    > So maybe this doesn't work quite as well for people who already know how to type others.

    They can't be sure in assumptions, so should work in good degree, anyway.

    > I'm not sure what I said was necessarily due to Socionics even though it's related it seems.

    Duals try to don't hit in your weak functions regions, but try support there. They see you as a kid there which needs help.

    > It was then that I was able to narrow things down or give a secondary impression that contradicted the first.

    So the correct sorting you were able to do only on 2nd pass, after you have watched all the types. When you did the sorting during the initial watching this leaded you to significantly other result. Interesting. What places had SLI and SEI in the 1st sorting made during watching?

    > It sounds like you're just a bit salty about something.

    She has troubles in understanding of own type. So it's harder for her to accept IR theory and understand effects of duality. Her type is some F, excluding base Fi ones.

  28. #148
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I came into this thread with the idea of checking out this typing method, but while a decent idea, I don't really trust the typings of the people used for the method.

  29. #149
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Some people were impatient, especially P types tend for this. :)
    So hurrah, we got 1st good fit to the theory, - in case you'll place your video to check your type is ENFP indeed. It would be useful to see the full sorting from you, but seems you've limited the sorting by 2 "best" types befor opening the key.
    You sorted by women, men or both? You've pointed to man example, so I'm curious.

    > I had an idea that # was SLI based on the old Jewish looking dude.

    as the most Jewish type I find ILI - they more relate to credits having Ni related to time, also Ni relates to mysticism

    > I guessed # was IEI. Lol.

    when EII man did this test, he've guessed correctly 50% of types groups. that EII was a novice. Ne and Fi are main functions used there. but he sorted strangely - he prefered own type, while all S-T went to bottom. he said that men examples he could to sort more classically, but did not try this

    > So maybe this doesn't work quite as well for people who already know how to type others.

    They can't be sure in assumptions, so should work in good degree, anyway.

    > I'm not sure what I said was necessarily due to Socionics even though it's related it seems.

    Duals try to don't hit in your weak functions regions, but try support there. They see you as a kid there which needs help.

    > It was then that I was able to narrow things down or give a secondary impression that contradicted the first.

    So the correct sorting you were able to do only on 2nd pass, after you have watched all the types. When you did the sorting during the initial watching this leaded you to significantly other result. Interesting. What places had SLI and SEI in the 1st sorting made during watching?

    > It sounds like you're just a bit salty about something.

    She has troubles in understanding of own type. So it's harder for her to accept IR theory and understand effects of duality. Her type is some F, excluding base Fi ones.
    I'm gay, so I looked at the videos of the men. I realized that the intention was for us to use the gender most likely to stimulate romantic attraction/duality. You said to use the opposite sex, but I knew you mean it for the purpose of potentially arousing the strongest feelings of duality, so I broke the rule to fulfil your goal. :P

    I didn't do a full sorting because I wasn't that interested in getting the full sorting. I was more interested in finding out which one or two types I felt best about. I have no problems typing others, but typing myself for some reason has always been an issue. I tend to very easily understand the mental attitudes of others at times, to such a degree that I can imagine myself being in those attitudes. Maybe that's an NF thing. It makes it a bit difficult to maintain a sense of self at times. (This is perhaps mixed with enneagram type 9.)

    I didn't do the process necessarily by sorting. I just did it by picking out which ones I liked AT ALL (period, even a little bit) at first. After that, I went through and gave them either plus marks, minus marks, or left them neutral, depending on what my second impression was. There was only one that came out with a plus sign. And that was the SLI video set. Curiously enough, LII ended up being in the final running because of one particular individual that you included in the set that I thought was OK. I still felt better about the SEIs than the one LII I liked in the sets. lol

    I'm not really interested in making a video for people to see. Sorry about that. I hope that my post gives you some hope about your method of typing though. I think it really does work.

  30. #150
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    I came into this thread with the idea of checking out this typing method, but while a decent idea, I don't really trust the typings of the people used for the method.
    Why don't you try it out and then see whether or not you agree with it? Or have you already looked at the key? If so, then there's no point.

  31. #151
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    Why don't you try it out and then see whether or not you agree with it? Or have you already looked at the key? If so, then there's no point.
    I don't need to, since having seen sol's typings in the forum. He doesn't even recognize subtypes; just from that I know his typing performance is low.

  32. #152
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    I don't need to, since having seen sol's typings in the forum. He doesn't even recognize subtypes; just from that I know his typing performance is low.
    Such a spoilsport.

  33. #153
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    I'm gay, so I looked at the videos of the men.
    Hence, the lesser quantity of men is enough (for Ne types, at least). This is good.

    > I realized that the intention was for us to use the gender most likely to stimulate romantic attraction/duality.

    Yep, there was the recommendation to use the romantically interesting sex. As romantically interesting sex/gender is more associated with the soul friendship, while other sex shifts to co-operation (and hence to similar types). Also the impressions from that sex should be stronger.
    I'm glad that my hypothesis seems was correct and the recommendation have worked on you. I also saw a girl (EIE) which reported homosexual behavior and showed such interests, - she have chosen quasi-identity type to top and some of her club as the best, while types of duals club placed to bottom, where own duals placed to the lowest 16th position.

    > I didn't do a full sorting because I wasn't that interested in getting the full sorting. I was more interested in finding out which one or two types I felt best about.

    The problem is the test is not perfect. You are lucky to have Ne type what made the sorting easier. The full sorting is intended to find tendencies, as excellent fiting to IR theory is not expected.

    > I tend to very easily understand the mental attitudes of others at times, to such a degree that I can imagine myself being in those attitudes.

    It's empathy - common for NF types, especially having Fi in ego.

    > This is perhaps mixed with enneagram type 9.

    Are you able to assume Enneagram type by impressions from nonverbal on video-interview with unknown language? Like you do with Socionics types. I'd pm you a clip to think.

    > I just did it by picking out which ones I liked AT ALL (period, even a little bit) at first. After that, I went through and gave them either plus marks, minus marks, or left them neutral, depending on what my second impression was. There was only one that came out with a plus sign. And that was the SLI video set.

    What types you've chosen on 1st step?

    > Curiously enough, LII ended up being in the final running because of one particular individual that you included in the set that I thought was OK.

    Which LII there?

    > I'm not really interested in making a video for people to see.

    Your type seems to be NF, at least. Some suspicion is for EII, as high empathy is more common for them, than IEE. So if you have doubts in own type you may check it by creating a second account (afte some time) and a typing thread - then you remove the video (after 2 weeks, for example) - and so keep high anonymity. On the video you may tell any general things you like, as the main text is placed in questionnaires anyway.

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    He doesn't even recognize subtypes
    There are no subtypes in classical Socionics so I don't even try to use that bs.

    > just from that I know his typing performance is low

    So you think that I badly identify types because I either badly identify subtypes or don't use them. Your base T is seen excellently.
    Also you may try to find someone who'd had with you real typing match >50% to think there is someone who identifies types good from your speculative opinion. That would give you some sense to say that I type badly compared to others in your perception. But objective thinking is not your strong part, what would be at LIE.
    I understand that you don't like that I doubt in your LIE opinion about own type. If you'd was real LIE, then you take it simpler.

    Your behavior closer to F type.
    Last edited by Sol; 10-07-2017 at 07:20 PM.

  34. #154
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    So you think that I badly identify types because I either badly identify subtypes or don't use them. Your base T is seen excellently.
    Also you may try to find someone who'd had with you real typing match >50% to think there is someone who identifies types good from your speculative opinion. That would give you some sense to say that I type badly compared to others in your perception. But objective thinking is not your strong part, what would be at LIE.
    I understand that you don't like that I doubt in your LIE opinion about own type. If you'd was real LIE, then you take it simpler.

    Your behavior closer to F type.
    It is not necessary to have a typing convergence with anyone to confirm someone's typing. The problem is that there is not objetive way to discern people's types. No machine has been invented that can read a person's brain patterns and tell what type their are. When this happens, discussions such as this will be over. Until then, we are just grasping at straws. A hundred people could be saying that someone is whatever type, and they could all still be wrong.

    But yeah, you're right; it is always annoying to have someone question your typing, because the action carries the implication that the person being retyped has poor self-awareness, or is not able to use the theory correctly, thus rendering their contributions useless. So ironically, I've exposed your own low typing performance. Subtypes are real, it doesn't matter what "classical socionics" says. Things evolve and advance, you know?

    If you doubt my skill so much, I can provide this gallery for reference. Perhaps you'll learn something
    Last edited by lavos; 10-07-2017 at 07:46 PM.

  35. #155
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Other problems with this typing method (besides the low reliability of the typings):

    - You are seeing this people on video. Meaning, you are not interacting with them in any way, and especially not face to face, which is where ITR's really can be experienced.
    - The fact that a certain kinship can be felt with someone you are seeing on video does not mean that you have a positive intertype relation with them. There's a myriad of factors at play.
    - I don't know how it works for other people, but I might like some particular person of a determinate type, and not others. For example, I might like some SLE's and not others, I might like some EII's and not others. I don't like all SLE's, and I don't like all EII's. I don't even like all ESI's.
    - It is possible to like people that apparently don't have a positive ITR with you. I tend to like some ESE's a great deal (for example).

  36. #156
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    You are seeing this people on video. Meaning, you are not interacting with them in any way, and especially not face to face, which is where ITR's really can be experienced.
    IR effects are felt from nonverbal. If you'll give me your video, I'll say your type and you'll have a chance to notice this.

  37. #157
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    IR effects are felt from nonverbal. If you'll give me your video, I'll say your type and you'll have a chance to notice this.
    Is this the best you can come up with after being defeated?

    For what? So that you can type me "INFP" like you did with @totalize?

    There goes your typing reliability.

  38. #158
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    Is this the best you can come up with after being defeated?
    You said nothing meaningful objective against the correctness of my typings or the method.
    I've offered you the easy way to understand that you are wrong and you've rejected it still.

    > So that you can type me "INFP" like you did with totalize?

    You seem to be F type and INFP is not excluded.
    I suspect you was typed to INFP, but prefer to dream yourself better than you are as ENTJ. That's why you may ask this. INFP is not bad version for you - you are intelligent but have hard issues with T. I need to see your video to be sure, - so I recommend to create typing theme with it. You are not base T for sure.

    > There goes your typing reliability.

    There is nothing objective to think my typings are bad or significantly worse than at others. And as you could see recently, there are chances my typings are not bad objectively.
    Stay with your dreams or give your video to help you understand me and yourself.

  39. #159
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    You said nothing meaningful objective against the correctness of my typings or the method.
    I've offered you the easy way to understand that you are wrong and you've rejected it still.

    > So that you can type me "INFP" like you did with totalize?

    You seem to be F type and INFP is not excluded.
    I suspect you was typed to INFP, but prefer to dream yourself better than you are as ENTJ. That's why you may ask this. INFP is not bad version for you - you are intelligent but have hard issues with T. I need to see your video to be sure, - so I recommend to create typing theme with it. You are not base T for sure.

    > There goes your typing reliability.

    There is nothing objective to think my typings are bad or significantly worse than at others. And as you could see recently, there are chances my typings are not bad objectively.
    Stay with your dreams or give your video to help you understand me and yourself.
    I am not willing to post my appearance online. I can provide test results for the test of your choice. But you seem to be a pretty thick-headed person, so I'm not sure I want to continue this discussion.

  40. #160

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    I don't need to, since having seen sol's typings in the forum. He doesn't even recognize subtypes; just from that I know his typing performance is low.
    I'm curious, can you say how not recognizing subtypes makes typing performance low?

Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •