How do you identify?
How do you identify?
Last edited by Iwantpeace; 09-03-2020 at 05:20 PM.
seems reductive and low res, but I'm also sure there's something to it. I think VI is hooked in to things via this as well, with hormones not just effecting cognition but also physical development
I think I got Director. Of course, my "match" is the Negotiator.
I bet your balls are huge Adam
It saves them from having to learn to sing.
I made a thread about this a while ago, though I kind of dropped the ball by not replying to anyone on it, lol. My guess was serotonin = Si ego, dopamine = Se ego, estrogen = NF, testosterone = NT. Though, LII doesn't really fit w testosterone IME.
I see you're approaching it more from the perspective of what would make sense within socionics intertype relations. I actually think it might have the power to explain a lot of the long-term relationships/friendships we see that are not necessarily good socionics fits. Like other members have pointed out ESEs and LSEs often end up together. Personally I know a fantastically solid SEI-SLI couple and an SEI-LSE couple.
I like this! Dopamine/Explorer. Slightly overlaps with what I posted in the Braverman Test Thread:
Dominant nature:
Dopamine 42
Acetylcholine 19
Serotonin 16
GABA 13
You Dope Chae, you dope.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/joannaborns...JVR#.xnkB16WK7
Director logic base
Negotiator ethics base
Explorers extraverted irrationals
Builders introverted irrationals
2nd variation
Director logic base
Negotiator ethics base
Explorers mid quadra irrationals
Builders alpha delta irrationals
Hard to pin it down. This is not necessarily about thinking style but more like along lines with lifestyle.
Just a guess
Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 08-09-2017 at 02:23 PM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I just took a hormonal test last week it will be nice to compare..
Estrogen.
I did a test
#1 Director
#2 Exploder
Directors are analytical, decisive, focused, inventive, competitive, independent and strategic-minded. They are also daring, original, direct, non-conforming, skilled at abstract thinking and short-term planning, often assertive, tough-minded and efficient.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I was reading the first "type":
And I was like okay. Then this:Explorers are curious, creative, adventurous, sexual, impulsive and self-reliant. They are also known for high energy, novelty, risk and pleasure seeking ways, and not being easily swayed by opinion.
How does Obama fit that description AT ALL? He's a stable, boring, dry "good", politician. What is sexual, impulsive, high energy, novelty, risk and pleasure seeking, and not being easily swayed by opinion (he's fairly in tune with what most of the world considers "right" and so on) about him? Lol. This article is hilarious. By the way I do not relate to any of them.The Explorers want the stimulation and the novelty of the big city, says Dr Fisher, who suspects President Barack Obama is an Explorer. He’s got charm, and the Explorer has charm to kill. The high-dopamine type is comfortable in his own skin. Look at the way Obama moves. It’s beautiful.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
running for president is not just boring shit dads do, it actually takes a shitload of guts and charisma
if you look at him in his younger days he was very social
I think your perceptions are just colored by your attitudes towards politics in general which happens to be of no great personal interest to you
the high energy thing for example is a huge perceptual thing: Trump is supposedly high energy but by all accounts is way less active than Obama (more vacations, more tv watching, less actual business taking place) etc. Obama just did not self promote as the image of "energy sex and adventure" but I think a closer look would reveal he embodied it rather than making his focus projecting a mere image of it
There was a similar test some years before, I remember getting a mix of director and explorer.
According to this system, I believe I´d have the highest compatibility with a builder-explorer.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
This is stupid.