Ok I did see the link yesterday but I'll look more into itOriginally Posted by Sol
sorry everyone for being a pest :/
Ok I did see the link yesterday but I'll look more into it
sorry everyone for being a pest :/
also just to say it's a really good resource you've shared so thank you on behalf of the group
the testing takes about 7 hours. may be done through several of days. there is description of the process
it should help to distinguish at least very different types version, as SEI and EII. to show which is more possible by IR, where there is lesser of influence of Self-image formed earlier about own type
Oh I've already started looking at the numbered groups...is that wrong?
No.
I have now changed my mind and I think you are IEI.
Sorry for ruling this out earlier.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
The mystery continues :3
seriously though it's ok, like you said, you can only really know via experience of intertype relationships and time
Its ok, don't apologise. Though I am curious as to what's changed your mind, if you don't mind sharing?
Don't pay any attention to what I'm saying. I just can't type you.
I respect Sol's typings, but you don't seem SEI.
You will confirm your type through the relationships. Good luck. And sorry for all my scattered opinions
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Honestly its ok, don't apologise. Thanks for the luck 😊🙏
There is no need to respect something. I've made a simple tool to check my typings by IR test.
If FlutteringShyxx will tell her sorting of my examples, we'll get the possibility to see additional argument for my opinion. Or will not see, - such happens sometimes too.
Do I post my sortings here or in your IR thread?
Better in IR test theme.
And done ✅
Hey there
I still personally don't think I'm a sensor. I admit I vibe a little SEI-y ESE-y... but I'm not eitherHey there
I have hard time with ESE.
EII, possibly SEI.
How do you see other SEIs and EIIs in your life?
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I see SEIs as so laid back and warming, truly friendly I admire how they seem to take life's troubles with a pinch of salt and gracefully put on a 'happy' face, which I guess jars me sometimes because I can't imagine how they can NOT (or seem not) to be concerned with the things I find anxiety inducing (I may be generalising here!) such as not offending others or causing accidental harm/embarrassment, having my work done close to perfect to make the nurses and my colleagues lives easier...I may be SEI in denial but I just think I am internally more rigid than one is, and functionally Fi Fe Ne Ni makes the most sense to my brain.
I don't know any real EIIs. why I relate though is that some EIIs in this forum have mentioned feeling misunderstood by others, that despite their good nature that they're often overlooked by some people for being too 'muted' and too polite; some people love controversy and to be entertained. Mia Wasikowska is an EII actress I think, and I do relate a little to her mannerisms and thought patterns, but what strikes me is that in comments on her interviews people write 'meh she's bland. She looks so awkward. I prefer *other actress*' which I think is unfair. And I feel that cause I know from experience that I've been 'slagged off' by other girls before for seeming aloof and boringly frigid because I am fairly quiet and apparently seem like I'm aloof, even though to my eyes I'm being polite and caring.
lol it's like, I think I'm being warming inviting kooky and interesting but instead I have resting bitch face. That said, the girl who I sometimes work with who made the comments about not being able to talk to me, well every time I try and ask about her well being or make a little joke, she looks as if she's smelt something terrible. So now I don't feel comfortable and I guess that's showing. Plus she's a big slacker...
I think in Model G you would have strong+ and really appreciate
-. I think
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
she's P type. while "G" is bs
Shoe-in for ESE-Fi 9w1 so/sx
SEI I'm not sure of...most feedback I have ever had off of close ones and even strangers online (and more importantly, my own self understanding) is that I'm an NF. Of all the types EII still feels the best fit for me or IEI/IEE as close seconds. SEI in third place. I do not relate at all to having Si as a lead. Lord knows I may be a more content relaxed soul if I did! I stress rather than resist pressure (which with all due respect I thought was Ij over Ip).
*puts a blue suede shoe in* unsure of my enneagram but 9 I think is plausible. ESE is a type I've never considered. I'm not Ej *puts the shoe out. In out in out, shakes it all about* sorry...
Seriously though, all feedback is welcome and I take t on board. I'm still exploring and lack that 'aha' moment of clarity yet. I feel so false and dumb for not being confident and sure of what type I am :/ but I suppose a lot of us are in the same boat ��
"Socionics Confused (Again!)", May 11, 2015
- I thought I was ISFp, then INFj, and now back to ISFp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIMB8glMp8Q
you were typed as SEI 2 years ago and have gotten same result now from me
you prefer P types with my examples. you are not base Fi, I'm sure as base Te.
you seem emotional person, so your choice is among F-P types
The WSS community that did initially think I was SEI changed their minds to EII when they did a more in depth interview
Anyway, the 1st version was SEI. If you independently (as I did not knew you was previously typed to SEI) get from several (and not the worst) sources same type - the probability it's correct is higher. Your type is not base Fi.
Check my types examples. Look at ENTP guys and girls - those are your best people.
Perhaps, but the fact that people get to know me and change their minds, and in respect to my own observations, I think SEI is not my best fit.
Do you mind sharing who here you DO think are EIIs?
People which type you to SEI with assurance and a _little later_ to EII, which is VERY different type, may after some thinking again to type you to SEI (if will stay objective to you). Also "they know me" is limited to say about Internet communication.
Try to understand that your type is P. I suspect this would not be hard. MBTI have given you P type too. You have prefered P examples of types.
J types are stable, - they make plans and follow them, as such is much more effective for them. They know what they will do today, they gather things for today in yesterday, they prefer to make any work by steps of close efforts - monotone working, if they want to buy something - they'll plan to do it not today but tomorrow as they already tuned for today planed things, etc.
> I think SEI is not my best fit
Type people near which are important for you. It's much easier than to type random people in Internet. Think about how your impressions from them fit to IR theory for SEI and EII versions of your type.
How to type. Take descriptions of dichotomies. Read and think, feel it intuitively - is the person closer to T or F description, and then similarly with other dichotomies.
> Do you mind sharing who here you DO think are EIIs?
On this forum I typed by video to EII only summerprincess. Some possibility her type is EIE. She thinks herself as IEI. So it's not very good, but the only EII woman example here.
I have not seen videos of others to be able to type them or assumed other more possible types. Like is with reverie which may to be ESI, besides EII. Like with wasp I'm sure is not EII.
Minde - she may to have base Fi, but I can't to distinguish between EII and ESI by her texts, I need a video.
For examples you may use bloggers. You may compare yourself with SEI and EII by their nonverbal.
Last edited by Sol; 09-26-2017 at 04:48 PM.
Jack, me, and Joy thought EII - I'm not sure about the others, many were still unclear on it. It was thought to be one of the two.
@FlutteringShyxx, I believe very strongly that you are EII. Honestly, once I saw the My Little Pony stuff, I figured that was a dead giveaway. But I still watched your video, and that confirmed my first guess. Also, there wasn't anything in the video that contradicted EII.
Here's a little hint: some LSEs have a secret passion for My Little Pony that they won't tell anyone about.I know from personal experience.
First four seconds - probably Si valuing
3 minutes - ethical introvert and si valuing
6 minutes - EII maybe.. fascination with humanity seems pretty EII typical, esp with Ne. Im not sure if an SEI/SLI really would be that fascinated with people as a whole and not just as a practical interest in people they know
post 6 minutes - haven't had any change of mind but you are increasingly making me feel the Delta
SEI, judging from vi
as you said you're not comfortable with the SEI typing (and I don't want to push that type on you if you can't see that as an option at all) but I just don't see EII for you
EII imo.
edit. Too caring of relational ethics according your own words for being Fe. The only people who truly cares about not hurting/offending others and being always polite are EII.
Last edited by Hope; 05-26-2018 at 12:04 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote