-
Reyne's type and VI
-
Last edited by Reyne; 04-03-2020 at 04:56 PM.
similar vibe to crazedrat in first minutes of the video
introverted ethical type e4, leaning towards ISFj
ESE.
You sure touch your head and face a lot.
Well, that removes my benefit ring from the equation. Also removes SLI benefit ring, I believe.Originally Posted by Reyne
Still seeming ESE, tbh.
Well, what you're doing in that video is ESE. Of course, you probably don't run around video taping yourself either.
For my opinion to be of any assistance, you'd have to relate such based upon the situation in question.
Did you feel social or personal? Malaise or energized? Confident or Control?
Soooo... SEI?
Don't listen to that troll.
Says the troll.
Idk that was weird lol
SEI has Creative Fe- and super-id Ne+ (your eyes were moving around a lot). The other questions I asked and you said energized (super-id) social and control (mental). Food for thought.
It would only potentially change the spin of the Ne in super ego. That would still leave the Fe- in the Ego, though.
You seem Alpha SF anyways, though. Not the negative stereotypes sometimes associated with it, though.
Fe- creative is like a measured quieting of emotions to promote positive interactions (like the opposite of when people keep talking/emoting after the "okay that's enough" point has passed). It's why SEI is the balancing type of Alpha; the merriment remains "okay" by the leadership of SEI lowering their own emotions.
That's my reasoning anyways lol. But, at least you now have the rationale of the viewpoint of you as SEI, to add to your list for your own educated judgement.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...unctions-Eglit
Introvert. I really doubt ESI but not definitely sure. I say logical type. LII might work. It is weird how similar super ego types can be at times.
Overall Ij temperament in my opinion.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
What type is that little black kid from Disney's Holes?
I think you're LSI
maybe LII...
I can see ESI also but I am not so sure about that...
Not SEI, no way
"A sloth, not a slut" .... LOL.
You randomly yawn and say you wanna sleep mid-sentence at one point .. that's your vibe in a nutshell.. it's not very rigid and linear, so I have no idea where the rational typings are coming from. This makes no sense to me.
You say that people call you cold, but your face is VERY emotive. Relatively dramatic facial expressions. I would guess IEI. It's also fairly easy for me to follow your train of thought, so it's not difficult for me to see you as being my dual.
There was also that joke you cracked which I mentioned at the beginning of my post. That's quite beta.
I'm sure if you are IEI you will like my post, because I actually have reasoning behind it, and connect things you displayed in your video to theory explicitly, making your time filming and then reading this not utterly worthless.
ESI or LSI
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Lol you're cute. Se-creative. Not intuitive imo.
Yupp, and one sees it especially in Normalizers like him.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Just came across this video. This is Alex Garland, the director of Ex Machina and I find you and him share some facial features, especially the eyes. He is listed on the 16types video examples as INTp
Just throwing this in here so others can watch it and share their opinion.
You look like Shia Labeouf
shia-labeouf.png
Yeah, that is a problem!
Have you seen interviews of him?
Would be interesting to see if you can relate to him in any way...
Though he is an actor, so you never know what he wants to show you... And he has done some crazy stuff for the public as far as I know
Just checked out one of his interviews, in which he seems very genuine...
Funnily enough, he mentions his reasons for wanting to go into acting, as wanting to be loved; filling a void that he was missing, in this area...
Interesting that you chose to mention this too (above).
That's a lot of practice! They are talking infront of people all of the time, so it will seem so natural for them.
By the way; wanting to be loved, and wanting love expressed to them, despite not necessarily expressing it themselves, has been described as FE seeking in socionics, which would hint at the following types:
LSI, SLE, LII, ILE
Could be FI seeking too though! I have seen various descriptions...
Sounds like some kind of F seeking...
This is where I would like to pass this over to someone who knows more than me about the functions, but....
From the descriptions on this popular site...
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/i...on_elements/Fi
Fe is described as 'conveying moods, passions and emotional state's', which would of course include expressing love...
Fi is decribed as 'making senitments and inner feelings known, in order to test the possibility of creating closeness with others' which would also include expressing love...
The difference seems to be creating expressions (FE) vs explaning deep feelings (FI)
From what I guess about what you said "I want the other person to show me her love the whole time"
I would guess that the expression is more important, as you want it all the time, rather than wanting to know her deep feelings (FI)
So I would guess FE seeking for you.
Yeah, it's not easy to know....
Ok, which of these would annoy you more?
(FI) Hanging around someone for the day, that constantly tells you how much they hate, or like everything and everyone.
(FE) Hanging around someone extremely expressive like Jim Carrey, for the day
Ok, I gave extreme examples for both, so most people would get annoyed at too much of both, but it sounds like you relate to FI more and so I would guess FI for you
SLI, ILI, LIE, LSE
I would say that SLI, ILI is more likely
He's an old member so there aren't any recent videos up. Typed as ILI initially, if I remember it right, and later changed his typing to Ni-IEI.
Eye movements was one thing that pointed to an introverted sensing type over an intuitive, is that if you watch your video closely, every time your eyes move they immediately focus on something. That's very typical of IS types and Se creatives especially. I'm sorta leaning towards ESI more now since finding Angry Foreigner's videos and seeing how you guys have some similar mannerisms and the way you modulate your voice.
LSE sounds very good for you bro
FI dual seeking seems clearer than anything else
Seems to be a preference of NE over SE
If not SLI, but LSE seems best
Also I don't see any reason why a TE dom couldn't appear introverted
So all fits and sounds good
Well if you agree that your either SLI or LSE, then you've narrowed the options down nicely...
I rewatched your video, and things that you said/did pointed at both...
You mentioned that your girlfriend said that you walk like a soldier; that could be described as 'EJ temperment' (LSE)
You fidgeted a lot; could also be described as EJ
However you said that you have been described as a sloth; sounds like IP temperment (SLI)
In socionics people also choose subypes, like LSE-si, or SLI-te, which could make you seem like more of a mixture of both
Check out the link below:
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/content.php/118-Temperaments
I watched about 20 seconds of the video and my impression is Introverted and probably EII.
EII females are kind of proper and respectable (for their LSE duals), but I have seen that EII males, while seeking answers and clarification (Te-seeking), are different and can be surprisingly rigid and can switch from seeming to be passive to being suddenly loud and aggressive. It's like they are saying, "I'm just cool here and I'm trying to do my own thing and you're trying to hit me GODDAMIT WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO HIT ME?" That was what my initial impression of the video was, FWIW.
Why not just take a socionics test? Or hang with some LSE's for a while?
what are you good at? Are you structured? If you are not structured, then you are not LSI. You seem slightly LSI. But otherwise EII can also be an option. EII can look both cruel, soldier like, and identical to SLUTH. We are couch-potatos. No, we are part of the couch itself. Maybe your girlfriend is ESE or SEE. That comment can come out of ESE towards an EII, I can imagine that.
Last edited by empineer; 06-19-2017 at 03:44 PM.
@Reyne
Interesting. Well, I'm not married to the concept of you being EII. It is just an impression I got, and my impressions are usually wrong.
I will say that your video didn't remind me of any of the SLI's that I know, and my father, ex-wife, and son are SLI and I work with a couple of SLI's. Still, that doesn't mean a lot.
I should watch the whole video.
I've always typed ENTJ or LIE-Te, but I started taking these tests when I was 31. It may be that if a person isn't yet settled in their life, they can look like other types. IDK.
Time will tell, I guess.
Interesting. Do you do things with your hands? Do you like drawing, playing music or anything like that? Do you nag a lot? Do you order people around?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote