Since economics also include business, figured this could be posted here. What's your style?
My result's pretty fitting --> Visionary Type. As an alternative, Coaching.
Quick Flow Chart Test - What Type of Leader Are You?
Since economics also include business, figured this could be posted here. What's your style?
My result's pretty fitting --> Visionary Type. As an alternative, Coaching.
democratic, but really all of them, except for visionary
Last edited by ouronis; 04-28-2017 at 03:35 PM.
Visionary
Coaching or democratic, I tink.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I got Visionary, which is quite accurate.
The advice is helpful, too.
I myself have come to the conclusion recently that I should make more use of clear metaphors, mainly in my fictional writing.
In the recent past, I'd write too much in a way where the metaphors were often too abstract or too personal; meaning, it would require people to see the world through my own eyes to understand them, and that is not really possible. I suppose this would create distance to the reader, my writing would be like a painting where the paint strokes are all over the place, disguising the real image underneath.
Also, my visions are often times "too grande", and it makes sense how that would lower the morale of the team; when you tell them to go for something that is not really part of their skill set (yet). "Reach for the stars!" Well, sometimes you need to reach for the clouds first.
What types of excuses would that be?Originally Posted by lungs
Commanding/pace setting
Otoh examples... It turns out they had to go through a third party to finish the task or they encountered some kind of red tape that's holding them up.
I got visionary on the flowchart because I'm patient and (assuming I trust the person) am not picky about how they achieve what I want. But the description doesn't fit me. I have ei näe metsää puilta syndrome, and I rarely think more than a couple weeks in advance.
Sometimes I'm the pace-setting leader, but only for small tasks like moving precariously-balanced objects. I think I used to do this more before I realized other people's methods were just as valid as mine.
doormat.
What? No dictator result? This offends both me and kim jong un.
Visionary>>Democratic>>>>>>>>>>>>Caching, No point in going any further than that.
Depends on the circumstances. I usually just give people my POV and then just allow them to decide what to do with that. I will also hold my position if I think what they argue isn't as good as what I suggest, but I am almost always open to working with people when there is a demonstrable goal. If someone has a better idea than me, then yeah, I will do it their way. occasionally, will try and encourage them, but this is rare.
I am a strong strong believer of leading by example. Ruling by force is evil (or close to it [I don't really believe in evil]).
I struggle with motivation, apathy and sticking to goals.
I struggle with motivation, apathy and sticking to goals.
Coaching. It fits well. If there are serious time-constraints I might tend more towards commanding. (People have commented on my coaching-type style in the past, unprompted)
Visionary or democratic... probably more democratic on average.
Strengths
You are able to communicate effectively during teamwork
You enjoy working on a team
Potential Strengths
Your interpersonal skills are satisfactory
You are sometimes able to resolve conflict with teammates
You are sometimes able to work with your team to resolve problems
You are able to manage some of the different tasks, goals and other aspects of teamwork
You set some goals when working on a team
You are reasonably skilled at planning and coordinating with teammates
Limitations
No limitations detected
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Strengths
You have good interpersonal skills
You are able to effectively resolve conflict with teammates
You are able to communicate effectively during teamwork
You are able to manage the different tasks, goals and other aspects of teamwork
You are good at setting team goals
You are skilled at planning and coordinating with teammates
Potential Strengths
You are sometimes able to work with your team to resolve problems
Limitations
You seem to prefer individual work over teamwork
Strengths
- You are good at setting team goals
Potential Strengths
- Your interpersonal skills are satisfactory
- You are sometimes able to resolve conflict with teammates
- You are able to communicate with others during teamwork with relative ease
- You are able to manage some of the different tasks, goals and other aspects of teamwork
- You are reasonably skilled at planning and coordinating with teammates
Limitations
- Problem solving as part of a team is a challenge for you
- You seem to prefer individual work over teamwork
I would say coaching or affiliative, maybe democratic.
Strengths
You have good interpersonal skills **
You are able to effectively resolve conflict with teammates
You are able to work with your team to resolve problems
You are able to communicate effectively during teamwork **
You are skilled at planning and coordinating with teammates
Potential Strengths
You are able to manage some of the different tasks, goals and other aspects of teamwork
Limitations
You don't set very many, if any goals, when part of a team project
You seem to prefer individual work over teamwork
** I personally think these should be either potential strengths or limitations.
Pace-setting
Why are there twice as many types for lazy people as for demanding people? Pffft...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
