Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 3 subtype system

  1. #1
    Tigerfadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    1,305
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default 3 subtype system

    why aint it a 3 subtype system with
    lead subtype
    creative subtype
    demonstrative subtype

  2. #2
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Because the demonstrative is unvalued and the ego fxs should be the most easily observable. Why u ask

  3. #3
    Tigerfadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    1,305
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lungs View Post
    Because the demonstrative is unvalued and the ego fxs should be the most easily observable. Why u ask
    demonstrative subtype is awesome, it make sense that there are 3 subtypes

  4. #4
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,254
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Running my daily business through demonstrative:

    Putting conscious effort to it? Not going to happen. It happens when it is needed and then it is quite effortless.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  5. #5
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well there's the DCNH subtype system which sort of gets to the possibility of enhanced demonstrative function.

    Take LII for example.

    LII-D, strengthened Te/Fe (extroverted rational functions)
    LII-C, strengthened Ne/Se (extroverted irrational functions)
    LII-N, strengthened Ti/Fi (introverted rational functions)
    LII-H, strengthened Ni/Si (introverted irrational functions)

    So an LII-H, in this theory would have a stronger demonstrative (as well as mobilizing) function.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chips and underwear View Post
    Well there's the DCNH subtype system which sort of gets to the possibility of enhanced demonstrative function.

    Take LII for example.

    LII-D, strengthened Te/Fe (extroverted rational functions)
    LII-C, strengthened Ne/Se (extroverted irrational functions)
    LII-N, strengthened Ti/Fi (introverted rational functions)
    LII-H, strengthened Ni/Si (introverted irrational functions)

    So an LII-H, in this theory would have a stronger demonstrative (as well as mobilizing) function.
    Sounds like OP is trying to describe subtypes by the strength of certain functions rather than by the orientation and rationality of the elements in those positions.
    It's not too far from DCNH if the categories were organized differently.

    Primary Type

    Auxiliary Type

    Demonstrative/Mobilizing Type

    Suggestive/Ignoring Type?

  7. #7
    mclane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think regardless of what your subtype is in the two-subtype system, everyone has a preference for a certain function. For example, a LII-Ne will have enhaced the following positions: Role (-Fi/+Fe), Creative (+Ne/-Ni), HA (+Si/-Se) and Demonstrative (+Ni/-Ne). Out of these enhacements, the person will have a preference. I'm not sure if it will always be one of the DCNH enhacements that get selected. For example, a Creative LII-Ne would have enhaced either their +Ne Creative, their -Se in HA, or their -Ne in Demonstrative. Not sure which of them get enhaced (or if it's all of them).

  8. #8
    I sacrificed a goat to Zeus and I liked it
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Durmstrang School
    Posts
    2,845
    Mentioned
    164 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think DCNH just flies in the face of socionics theory. The lead excludes the role, and the creative excludes the PoLR. Saying that both the lead and the role, or the creative and PoLR, are strengthened together makes no sense, especially once you realize that it basically makes all static types typically creative-normalizing and all dynamic types typically dominant-harmonizing. My observation has been more of axial strengthening of functions (basically, rather than Pe, Pi, Je, Ji, it's Nx, Sx, Fx, Tx) which also makes more sense in almost every interpretation of the theory. Organizing DCNH differently might be enough to save it though, but I'm not sure it needs saving at all when there are so many more useful things that are also easier to work with.

  9. #9
    back for the time being Chae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    ExFx 3 sx
    Posts
    9,183
    Mentioned
    720 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyrd View Post
    I think DCNH just flies in the face of socionics theory. The lead excludes the role, and the creative excludes the PoLR. Saying that both the lead and the role, or the creative and PoLR, are strengthened together makes no sense, especially once you realize that it basically makes all static types typically creative-normalizing and all dynamic types typically dominant-harmonizing. My observation has been more of axial strengthening of functions (basically, rather than Pe, Pi, Je, Ji, it's Nx, Sx, Fx, Tx) which also makes more sense in almost every interpretation of the theory. Organizing DCNH differently might be enough to save it though, but I'm not sure it needs saving at all when there are so many more useful things that are also easier to work with.
    Mhm this makes far more sense ^^^^

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •