Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Function +/- signs: which model is correct?

  1. #1
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,108
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default Function +/- signs: which model is correct?

    I've seen a couple of different models for functions of signs and am wondering which model you think is more 'correct' if either?

    Sorry, I don't have the specific names for these 'models.'

    Model 1:

    Signs 1.jpg

    Model 2:

    Signs 2.png
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  2. #2
    Tigerfadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    927
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It is an eternal swim in the greyland of overlaps. What I gathered earlier is ILI who been Ni- and Se+ which kind of work so that it use Ni to the bone and Se is the flesh. Duals share the same spins, at least in lead and suggestive. IEI is the opposite spin from ILI.

  3. #3
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,130
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Is there a difference?
    I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.

    Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If itís a disease, itís nobodyís fault. Yay empiricism.

  4. #4
    Fembot Olimpia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    IEI-1Ni
    Posts
    6,548
    Mentioned
    538 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't see a difference between the Models themselves.
    They order the functions a bit differently, but signs-wise they are the same.

    I have looked a bit closer at them, and I believe both are half-wrong actually, haha.

    Personally, I go by the signs Gulenko assigns to the IE.

    For example, he says IEI has got: +Ni, +Fe, -Ti, -Se etc.
    In the models above, it says for IEI: -Ni, +Fe, -Ti, +Se .

    As far as I know, there are two different ideas on +/- in Socionics. I cannot remember which is which,
    but it seems like those models represent the first idea, and Gulenko's take on it represents the second idea.

    Having read Gulenko's work on it, and connected the dots to real-life people (including myself ),
    I find Gulenko's take accurate and more valuable.

    Gulenko +:- functions.jpg
    4w5-9w1-5w6 So/Sx

    My typing blog [x]
    My theory blog [x]
    My tumblr blog [x]
    My film blog [x]
    Discord [x]


  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,101
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SisOfNight View Post
    As far as I know, there are two different ideas on +/- in Socionics.
    The only idea Jung's typology and Socionics has - no difference between those + and -. The models above is external and unbased hypothesis.

    I find Gulenko's take accurate and more valuable.
    There are a lot of ones who find wrong even own types, not just tiny hypothetical functions variations.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Personally, this is my point of view:

    Alpha: +(Ne/Si, Te/Fi), -(Se/Ni, Fe/Ti)
    Beta: +(Ne/Si, Fe/Ti), -(Se/Ni, Te/Fe)
    Gamma: +(Se/Ni, Fe/Ti), -(Ne/Si, Te/Fi)
    Delta:+(Se/Ni, Te/Fe), -(Ne/Si, Fe/Ti)

  7. #7
    Word Definition Warrior Ė WDW Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    dispersed into the cosmos
    TIM
    H-ILE-Ne 7w6-2w1-1w9
    Posts
    1,971
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gulenko refers to those signs as representing something to public that trumps over quadra values momentarily or just overall way to function?
    Enneagram 3 blindspot. Visual deficits in 4, 8. Triple instinctual blindspot.

    Highly immature Discord channel
    because enneagram is just too simple and therefore we need to develop a new classification system called Rhombic triacontahedron with life module containing eukaryotes, prokaryotes and virus.

  8. #8
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,130
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I prefer the model with the minus sign corresponding to the aristocratic quadras valued perception elements, and the democratic quadras valued judgement elements.
    I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.

    Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If itís a disease, itís nobodyís fault. Yay empiricism.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •