Ej brings some organization or order to their outside world
Ij brings some organization or order to their inside world
Temperaments: Ej vs. Ij
Ej brings some organization or order to their outside world
Ij brings some organization or order to their inside world
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
MBTI-style BS
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
I don't think soOriginally Posted by consentingadult
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Aren't Ti-base types outwardly organized though?
Idk
Are you??
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Te - knowledge of facts about external world
Ti - links between these facts
order is more Ti thing
How about organization?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ti-valuing?Idk
Are you??
ILI is one thing but Alpha/Beta is just way off
No are you or do you internally organize lolTi-valuing?
ILI is one thing but Alpha/Beta is just way off
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think it is legit in theory, but what can you really accomplish with that kind of thinking?
I think rational types are less prone to being impulsive than irrational types. I think bothand
are concerned with being ordered and systematic in their own ways.
and
-leading types are far more flexible than
A well developed person will do both. Take good care of the inner and outer worlds as the illusion between them fades with self-mastery.
Your ego will tell you things like "I can't be a sweet and loving/good person because I'm outgoing" or the reverse "I can't take action and kick this person's ass because I'm a shy introverted faget" (and many times the ego feels so serious and heavy and true and can't be beat- but it can. It's just a way of self-limitation)
You need to fight your inner demons and surprise yourself.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote