Here from another world! What's up?
I'm a newcomer from Reddit after the MBTI subreddit took a turn for the worst and I decided to try and clean my slate of Jungian information (read Chapter 10 a million times), and was interested in learning more about Socionics.
What's a good starting point?
Thanks! You too!Originally Posted by hag
Throughout reading Jung's descriptions of the functions, I've always felt that Ni was my lead. Even when I have my doubts, something comes up that is exactly what Ni is (or what I think it is) and I come back to it. I've been typed by somebody who was really into Socionics (cognitive styles, +/-, etc.) and he said my type was IEI and it made sense to me so I've stuck with it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Why not go to other source, the founder of Socionics. http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...gustinaviciute
Oooooh that looks nice, thank you!
Filatova E. "Understanding the People around You: An Introduction to Socionics", 2010
"cognitive styles, +/-" is not normal Socionics but later baseless hypotheses of some "authors". So that your somebody was really out of what is called Socionics as used external bs. The only hope is he used not only that bs to type you, but as average typing match is <30% there is significant chance you was typed wrongly.
You may create your typing theme to check your type
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1096450
Yeah, they used a lot more than that. Usually people who are invested in Socionics like to play around with the lesser known, the 'newer' things like what I mentioned. I don't have a lot of time on my hands but when I do, I'll try to remember to make a video!
Hiyu!
Did you really read Chapter 10 from start to end many times? O_o
Once or twice...maybe thrice
Call me a nerd but I thought it was really interesting!!!
I did find it very interesting too. But you have a lot more patience than me. You can't be SLE-Ti
Yeah I'm an ESE-Fe 5w4 sp/sxI did find it very interesting too. But you have a lot more patience than me. You can't be SLE-Ti
Huh? Why the ESE reference?
No reason. Just came to me, probably because that is so out of left-field for me + an ESFj with 5w4? I would love to see that
Maybe ESE is the dual...
LII would be interesting... Except I don't think Se is vulnerable
Your mother! Is a whore!
I need a picture from the side shoulders up please
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
OK, let's continue this in your typing thread
Not sure if this one works or not. If not, let me know and I'll get one to you when I have a moment.
https://imgur.com/a/QBfBg
Not really more like a mug shot
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
SLE or LSE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hmm...
is this supposed to be the other way around?I did find it very interesting too. But you have a lot more patience than me. You can't be SLE-Tithe LSI has more patience than the SLE-Ti ... if he has more patience to read the chapter than you do as LSI that wouldn't make him SLE
Right, the idea is that if he has more patience than me then he is a type that's more patient than mineis this supposed to be the other way around?
(I wasn't entirely serious there, especially because any type could have patience to read all that several times for some reason so it's just a heuristics at best.)
Yeah I'm an SLE Enneagram 9-9-9Right, the idea is that if he has more patience than me then he is a type that's more patient than mine
(I wasn't entirely serious there, especially because any type could have patience to read all that several times for some reason so it's just a heuristics at best.)
Sure lol
Some kinds of executions LSI will hold worse than SLE. Make more logical jumps in conversation, overload by facts and you'll notice how LSI boils a little sooner than SLE near.
Exert pressure on Fi PoLR of SLE and you'll notice how SLE will boil sooner than LSI
Btw personally I'm only bothered by logical jumps, facts are ok, I don't really get impatient about that. I'll either be able to place them in my understanding right away (if it's such) or I'll put them aside for the time being until they can be processed and placed. No real stress there though it can get boring if it's just some list of facts and no logic behind.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
