A simple but fine example of SLI-IEE duality (ISTp and ENFp)

[consentingadult]

As a temp-chef (who can't really cook, but has found his niche anyway), I sometimes have to work at the staff restaurant of Holland's largest airport. One of the regulars I work with over there, an SLI guy from India, always is glad to see me.

So when I arrived this morning at 7 AM, and had changed into my chef's clothing, ready to start work, he said: "Come, let's have a cup of coffee first, there is plenty of time."

[FarDraft]

Why do you think this represents an SLI IEE duality?

[consentingadult]

Why do you think this represents an SLI IEE duality?

Obviously the example I provided doesn't explain or prove anything to the reader, but I assure you, I experienced the effects of duality. Perhaps one day you yourself will be able to recognize how little, seemingly insignificant things are signs of duality in action.

[Lord Pixel]

Obviously the example I provided doesn't explain or prove anything to the reader, but I assure you, I experienced the effects of duality. Perhaps one day you yourself will be able to recognize how little, seemingly insignificant things are signs of duality in action.

That's fine and dandy, but you made a thread about this and I assume were trying to commmunicate something to people. So you not explaining what you meant or at least even acknowledging in the OP that it might not make sense to people who weren't there, is a lack of communication on your part to fulfill the claim in the thread title. So you should have expected responses like FarDraft. I would put a disclaimer in OP that people who weren't there might not understand but this felt like duality to you nonetheless. So we can at least understand that it is not meant for us to understand.

[consentingadult]

That's fine and dandy, but you made a thread about this and I assume were trying to commmunicate something to people. So you not explaining what you meant or at least even acknowledging in the OP that it might not make sense to people who weren't there, is a lack of communication on your part to fulfill the claim in the thread title. So you should have expected responses like FarDraft. I would put a disclaimer in OP that people who weren't there might not understand but this felt like duality to you nonetheless. So we can at least understand that it is not meant for us to understand.

You are putting words into my mouth. I never said it cannot be understood, I said that other people do not automatically experience such an event as duality working in practice. What I was trying to communicate, is that duality can work in very simple ways, and this, I think, can be perfectly understood. It is my way of saying: take a look at the small interactions in life, and you might see Socionics effects at work in interactions that might normally pass unnoticed as insignificant.

[Lord Pixel]

You are putting words into my mouth. I never said it cannot be understood, I said that other people do not automatically experience such an event as duality working in practice. What I was trying to communicate, is that duality can work in very simple ways, and this, I think, can be perfectly understood. It is my way of saying: take a look at the small interactions in life, and you might see Socionics effects at work in interactions that might normally pass unnoticed as insignificant.

Duality is not obvious in the OP.