I've been lurking this site for a while, i finally decided to sign up so i could actually take part in discussions. I look forward to arguing over dumb shit with you guys. I'm an IEI btw. I'm pretty sure i'm the Ni subtype. Eneagram 4w5.
I've been lurking this site for a while, i finally decided to sign up so i could actually take part in discussions. I look forward to arguing over dumb shit with you guys. I'm an IEI btw. I'm pretty sure i'm the Ni subtype. Eneagram 4w5.
you may create a typing thread, as it's often people mistake about own type
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1096450
Welcome
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
hey
Welcome to Hell, brosef.
Ohh my boys first day at the forum as a registered user, fuck it up @replica, fuck it up
hi there - an IEI is just what this place needs
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
There are a lot of people which are sure in their type and mistake anyway. When people type with common match <30%, the situation is not suprising.
If you did not check thoroughly your type by intertype relations with getting result good fitting to the theory, there is high chance for mistake.
So I never trust what other people think about own type, even when they are years in typology, and recommend similar to others.
I met at least 4 "gurus", which study others to type and theory, while incorrectly think about own type, and 1 guru which had popular socionics site for several years and then changed opinion about own type. While your level, as I understand, is just novice.
That's why it's good to get opinions about your type. Or at least to check your type yourself by IR (with people near you or you may use my bloggers examples in the signature).